Pépin, Jean‐Louis

Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, current evidence is equivocal regarding the potential benefits of treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in HFpEF. This study assessed the association between adherence to PAP therapy and health care resource use in patients with OSA and HFpEF. Methods and Results Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy usage data from patients with OSA and HFpEF were used to determine associations between PAP adherence and a composite outcome including hospitalizations and emergency room visits. One‐year PAP adherence was based on an adapted US Medicare definition. Propensity score methods were used to create groups with similar characteristics across PAP adherence levels. The study cohort included 4237 patients (54.0% female, mean age 64.1 years); 40% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (30% intermediate adherent, 30% nonadherent). In the matched cohort, PAP‐adherent patients had fewer health care resource use visits than nonadherent patients, a 57% decrease in hospitalizations, and a 36% decrease in emergency room visits versus the year before PAP initiation. Total health care costs were lower in adherent patients than nonadherent patients ($12 732 versus $15 610, P <0.001). Outcomes for intermediately adherent patients were most similar to those for nonadherent patients. Conclusions Treating OSA with PAP therapy in patients with HFpEF was associated with a reduction in health care resource use. These data highlight the importance of managing concomitant OSA in patients with HFpEF, and the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in heart failure, although the impact of OSA treatment remains unclear. We assessed the association between adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and healthcare resource utilization in patients with OSA and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy usage data from patients with OSA and HFrEF were used to measure the association of PAP adherence and a composite clinical outcome of hospitalization and emergency room (ER) visits. US Medicare defines PAP compliance as usage of the device for at least 4 hours/night for 70% of nights in a consecutive 30-day period over 90 days. PAP adherent patients met these criteria for all 4 90-day periods, while PAP non-adherent patients did not meet these criteria for any 90-day period over one year. Propensity score methods were used to create well matched groups with differing PAP adherence levels. Results: The study cohort consisted of 3,182 eligible patients (69.9% male, mean age 59.7 years) of whom 39% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (29% intermediate-adherent, 31% non-adherent). In the year after PAP prescription, after propensity score matching, PAP adherent patients had fewer hospital visits than non-adherent patients, driven by a 24% reduction in ER visits for adherent patients (Table 1a). These results remained consistent with inverse probability weighting and furthermore showed there were no statistically significant differences between intermediate-adherent and non-adherent patients for any outcome (Table 1b). Conclusions: Treating OSA with PAP therapy in patients with HFrEF is associated with a reduction in the composite outcome of hospitalization and ER visits, driven primarily by a reduction in ER visits. Consistent adherence to PAP therapy is required to realize these benefits.

Introduction: The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in heart failure (HF) patients varies from 30 to 50%. The differences in clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and positive airway pressure (PAP) usage between HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in OSA patients are not well known. Objective: To compare clinical characteristics, PAP usage, and HCRU in OSA patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using US administrative claims data linked to objective PAP usage data over one year. HFpEF and HFrEF were identified by ICD-9/10 codes associated with healthcare encounters 1 year before starting PAP therapy. Pearson’s Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used as applicable to compare baseline characteristics and PAP usage, and the pre to post-PAP initiation difference in the number of health care encounters. Results: In total, 7,419 patients with HF and OSA were identified, of which 57% had HFpEF. HFpEF patients were majority female (54%) and older than those with HFrEF (64.1 ± 11.52 vs 59.7 ± 11.24 years, p<0.001). HFpEF had a higher overall comorbidity burden, although coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and other arrhythmias were more prevalent in HFrEF. Both prior to and after PAP therapy, HCRU was higher in HFpEF patients compared to HFrEF (Table 2a). There were no differences in PAP usage between HFpEF and HFrEF (3.6 ± 2.9 vs 3.7 ± 3.0 hrs/night, p=0.070) over the first year of PAP therapy. There was a significant reduction in ER visits and all cause hospitalizations after 1 year of PAP therapy initiation, which was similar between groups (Table 2b). Conclusions: Although there were differences in clinical characteristics between HFpEF and HFrEF patients with OSA, and HFpEF is associated with greater HCRU, PAP therapy usage was similar, and both groups experienced a similar reduction in HCRU after the first year of PAP initiation.

Introduction: Heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently have co-morbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), although the impact of OSA treatment remains unclear in this patient population. We assessed the association between adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and healthcare resource utilization in patients with OSA and HFpEF. Methods: Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy usage data from patients with OSA and HFpEF were used to measure the association of PAP adherence and healthcare resource utilization, defined by hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits. US Medicare defines PAP compliance as use for at least 4 hours/night for 70% of nights in a consecutive 30-day period over 90 days. PAP adherent patients met this criteria for all 4 90-day periods, while PAP non-adherent patients did not meet this criteria for any 90-day period over one year. Propensity score methods were used to create well matched groups with differing PAP adherence levels. Results: The study cohort consisted of 4,237 eligible patients (54.0% female, mean age 64.1 years), of whom 40% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (30% intermediate-adherent, 30% non-adherent). After propensity score matching on prior year covariates, during the year after PAP prescription, PAP adherent patients had fewer hospital visits than non-adherent patients, with a 57% reduction in hospitalizations and a 36% reduction in ER visits for PAP adherent patients (Table 1a). These results remained consistent with inverse probability weighting, and furthermore showed a significant difference in hospitalizations between intermediate-adherent and non-adherent patients, but no significant difference in ER visits (Table 1b). Conclusions: Treating OSA with PAP therapy in patients with HFpEF is associated with a reduction in hospitalizations and ER visits. Adherence to PAP therapy is required to realize these clinical benefits.

Abstract Introduction The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is high in patients with systolic heart failure (HFrEF) and has been associated with poor prognosis in this patient population. The impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in patients with OSA and HFrEF remains unclear. This retrospective study sought to investigate the association between 1-year adherence to PAP therapy and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with newly diagnosed OSA and comorbid HFrEF. Methods A national sample of administrative claims data linked to objective PAP therapy usage was used for this analysis. Included patients either had two healthcare encounters or one hospitalization with a systolic heart failure ICD-10 diagnosis code the year prior to being diagnosed with OSA and initiated on PAP therapy. HCRU was measured as a composite outcome of hospitalizations, and emergency room (ER) visits. Propensity score matching was used to create well-balanced groups with differing PAP adherence levels to assess the association with 1-year HCRU outcomes. Risk-adjusted models were used to generate the number needed to treat (NNT) that referred to the number of patients that need to become adherent to PAP from non-adherent to avoid 1 visit. Results We identified 3,182 patients with OSA and comorbid HFrEF, and after propensity score matching, 738 patients remained in each group (adherent vs. non-adherent). After 1 year of PAP therapy, adherent patients had fewer visits than non-adherent patients (0.92 vs. 1.15 visits per subject, p = 0.006), which was driven by a 24% reduction in ER visits for adherent patients. Composite hospitalization and ER visit costs were lower in adherent versus non-adherent patients ($3,500 vs. $5,879, p=0.03). The NNT for the entire cohort to avoid one visit was 1.5 patients. Conclusion HFrEF patients with comorbid OSA who were adherent to PAP therapy for 1 year have fewer composite hospitalizations and ER visits than patients that were not adherent. These results highlight the clinical and economic benefits of treating OSA in HFrEF patients. Support (if any) Funding Source: ResMed

Abstract Introduction Although diastolic heart failure (HFpEF) patients frequently have comorbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which has been associated with poor prognosis, the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy remains unclear. This retrospective study sought to investigate the association between 1 year adherence to PAP therapy and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with newly diagnosed OSA and comorbid HFpEF. Methods A national sample of administrative claims data linked to objective PAP therapy usage was used for this analysis. Eligible patients either had two healthcare encounters or one hospitalization with a diastolic heart failure ICD-10 diagnosis code the year prior to being diagnosed with OSA and initiated on PAP therapy. HCRU was measured as a composite outcome of hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits. Propensity score matching was used to create well-balanced groups with differing PAP adherence levels to assess the association with 1 year HCRU outcomes. Risk-adjusted models were used to generate the number needed to treat (NNT) that referred to the number of patients that need to become adherent to PAP from non-adherent to avoid 1 visit. Results 4,237 patients with OSA and comorbid HFpEF were included. With propensity score matching, 963 PAP adherent and 963 non-adherent patients remained. After 1 year of PAP therapy, adherent patients had fewer visits than non-adherent patients (1.16 visits per subject vs. 1.75, p &lt; 0.001), driven by a 57% reduction in hospitalizations and a 36% reduction in ER visits for adherent patients. Total HCRU costs were lower in adherent patients than in non-adherent patients ($12,732 vs. $15,610, p&lt; 0.01). Converting 1 patient from non-adherent to adherent would avoid 1.25 visits (either ER visit or hospitalization), with an NNT of 0.8. Conclusion HFpEF patients with OSA that are adherent to PAP therapy for 1 year have fewer hospitalizations and ER visits than patients that are not adherent. More importantly, HCRU costs were lower in adherent patients, highlighting the clinical and economic benefits of treating OSA with PAP therapy in HFpEF patients. Support (if any) Funding Source: ResMed

Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure, although current evidence is equivocal regarding the potential benefits of treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in patients with heart failure. This study assessed the impact of adherence to PAP therapy on health care resource utilization in patients with OSA and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results Administrative insurance claims data linked with objective PAP therapy use data from patients with OSA and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were used to determine associations between PAP adherence and a composite outcome of hospitalizations and emergency room visits. One‐year PAP adherence was based on an adapted US Medicare definition. Propensity score methods were used to create groups with similar characteristics across PAP adherence levels. The study cohort included 3182 patients (69.9% male, mean age 59.7 years); 39% were considered adherent to PAP therapy (29% intermediate adherent, 31% nonadherent). One year after PAP initiation, adherent patients had fewer composite visits than matched nonadherent patients, driven by a 24% reduction in emergency room visits for adherent patients. Composite visit costs were lower in adherent versus nonadherent patients ($3500 versus $5879, P =0.031), although total health care costs were not statistically different ($13 028 versus $14 729, P =0.889). Conclusions PAP therapy adherence in patients with OSA with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was associated with a reduction in health care resource utilization. This suggests that greater emphasis should be placed on diagnosing and effectively treating OSA with PAP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

SummaryThis SERVE‐HF (Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure) sub study analysis evaluated polysomnography (PSG) data in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and predominant central sleep apnea (CSA) randomised to guideline‐based medical therapy, with or without adaptive servo ventilation (ASV). Patients underwent full overnight PSG at baseline and at 12 months. All PSG recordings were analysed by a core laboratory. Only data for patients with baseline and 3‐ or 12‐month values were included. The sub study included 312 patients; the number with available PSG data differed for each variable (94–103 in the control group, 77–99 in the ASV group). After 12 months, baseline‐adjusted respiratory measures were significantly better in the ASV group versus control. Although some between‐group differences in sleep measures were seen at 12 months (e.g., better sleep efficiency in the ASV group), these were unlikely to be clinically significant. The number of periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS) increased in the ASV group (p = 0.039). At 12 months, the respiratory arousal index was significantly lower in the ASV versus control group (p < 0.001), whilst the PLMS‐related arousal index was significantly higher in the ASV group (p = 0.04 versus control). ASV attenuated the respiratory variables characterising sleep apnea in patients with HFrEF and predominant CSA in SERVE‐HF. Sleep quality improvements during ASV therapy were small and unlikely to be clinically significant. The increase in PLMS and PLMS‐related arousals during ASV warrants further investigation, particularly relating to their potential association with increased cardiovascular risk.

ABSTRACTBackground and objectiveIncreases in Cheyne–Stokes respiration (CSR) cycle length (CL), lung‐to‐periphery circulation time (LPCT) and time to peak flow (TTPF) may reflect impaired cardiac function. This retrospective analysis used an automatic algorithm to evaluate baseline CSR‐related features and then determined whether these could be used to identify patients with systolic heart failure (HF) who experienced serious adverse events in the Treatment of Sleep‐Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure (SERVE‐HF) substudy.MethodsA total of 280 patients had overnight diagnostic polysomnography data available; an automated algorithm was applied to quantify CSR‐related features.ResultsMedian baseline CL, LPCT and TTPF were similar in the control (n = 152) and adaptive servo‐ventilation (ASV, n = 156) groups. In both groups, CSR‐related features were significantly longer in patients who did (n = 129) versus did not (n = 140) experience a primary endpoint event (all‐cause death, life‐saving cardiovascular intervention or unplanned hospitalization for worsening HF): CL, 61.1 versus 55.1 s (P = 0.002); LPCT, 36.5 versus 31.5 s (P < 0.001); TTPF, 15.20 versus 13.35 s (P < 0.001), respectively. This finding was independent of treatment allocation.ConclusionPatients with systolic HF and central sleep apnoea who experienced serious adverse events had longer CSR CL, LPCT and TTPF. Future studies should examine an independent role for CSR‐related features to enable risk stratification in systolic HF.