Back to Authors

Dark, Paul

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-0164

Mayo Clinic

King's College London

Citations 2

Two years and counting: a prospective cohort study on the scope and severity of post-COVID symptoms across diverse patient groups in the Netherlands—insights from the CORFU study
Klein, Dorthe O. , Waardenburg, Sophie , Janssen, Emma B N J , Wintjens, Marieke S. J. N. , Imkamp, Maike , Heemskerk, Stella C M , Birnie, Erwin , Bonsel, Gouke J. , Warlé, Michiel C. , Jacobs, Lotte M. C. , Hemmen, Bea , Bussel, Bas C. T. van , Santen, Susanne van, Kietelaer, Bas L J H, Jansen, Gwyneth , Vernooy, Kevin , Haagsma, Juanita A. , Asselbergs, Folkert W. , Cate, Hugo Ten , Wilmes, Nick , Ghossein‐Doha, Chahinda , Dark, Paul , Caputo, Massimo , Waardenburg, Sophie F , van Bussel, Bas C T , Cals, Jochen W L , Ten Cate, Hugo , van der Horst, Iwan C C , van Kuijk, Sander M J , Hemmen, Bena , Verbunt, Jeanine , Klok, Frederikus Albertus , Kruif, Martijn D. de , Linschoten, Marijke , Cals, Jochen , Cate, Hugo Ten

BMJ Open | September 12, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 9 | Pages: e093639

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093639 Get It

Importance Little research has been done on post-COVID symptoms at 24 months postinfection and on the association these may have on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objective We assessed the prevalence and severity of post-COVID symptoms and quantified EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), self-perceived health question (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) and health utility scores (HUS) up to 24 months follow-up. Design The longitudinal multiple cohort CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) study combines seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public. The participants received questionnaires on several time points. Participants were stratified by: without a known SARS-CoV-2 infection (control group), proven SARS-CoV-2 infection but non-hospitalised, proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the ward, and proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the intensive care unit (ICU). Setting In this study, data of seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public are included. Participants Former COVID-19 patients and controls participated in this cohort study. Main outcomes and measures Former COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls were sent questionnaires on symptoms associated with post-COVID condition. The CORFU questionnaire included 14 symptom questions on post-COVID condition using a five-level Likert-scale format. Furthermore, HRQOL was quantified using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire: EQ-VAS and the EQ-5D-5L utility score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire includes five domains that are scored on a five-point Likert scale: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Results A total of 901 participants (and 434 controls) responded at 24 months follow-up. In all former COVID-19 patients, the presence of post-COVID condition at 24 months was observed in 62 (42.5%, 95% CI 34.3% to 50.9%) of the non-hospitalised patients, 333 (65.0%, 95% CI 60.7% to 69.2%) of the hospitalised ward patients and 156 (63.2%, 95% CI 56.8% to 69.2%) of the ICU patients, respectively (p<0.001). The most common symptoms included fatigue, sleep problems, muscle weakness/pain and breathing issues, with hospitalised participants reporting most often having symptoms. Multiple post-COVID symptoms were significantly associated with EQ-5D-5L measures. The mean and SD of the EQ-VAS were 71.6 (17.9), 70.0 (17.3) and 71.4 (17.5) for non-hospitalised, ward and ICU participants, respectively, and 75.6 (17.7) for the controls (p<0.001). The HUS resulted in 0.81 (0.20), 0.77 (0.19) and 0.79 (0.22) for non-hospitalised, hospitalised ward and ICU participants, respectively, and 0.84 (0.19) for the control group (CG) (p<0.001). Conclusions Many former COVID-19 patients experience post-COVID symptoms at 24 months follow-up, with the highest prevalence in hospitalised participants. Also, former patients reported a lower HRQOL. Trial registration number The CORFU study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT05240742).
Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice
Prescott, Hallie C. , Iwashyna, Theodore J. , Blackwood, Bronagh , Calandra, Thierry , Choong, Karen , Connolly, Bronwen , Dark, Paul , Ferrucci, Luigi , Finfer, Simon , Girard, Timothy D. , Hopkins, Ramona O., Hough, Catherine L. , Jackson, James C. , Machado, Flávia Ribeiro , Misak, Cheryl, Needham, Dale M. , Panigrahi, Pinaki , Reinhart, Konrad , Yende, Sachin , Zafonte, Ross , Rowan, Kathy , Finfer, Simon , Girard, Timothy D , Ferrucci, Luigi , Chlan, Linda L. , Hodgson, Carol Lynette , Marshall, John C. , Angus, Derek C. , Prescott, Hallie C

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | June 11, 2019 | Volume: 200 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 972-981

10.1164/rccm.201812-2383cp Get It

Abstract An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting longer-term recovery. To address this unmet need, the International Sepsis Forum convened a colloquium in February 2018 titled “Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship.” The goals were to identify gaps and limitations of current research and shorter- and longer-term priorities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Twenty-six experts from eight countries participated. The top short-term priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting were to better leverage existing databases for research, develop and disseminate educational resources on postsepsis morbidity, and partner with sepsis survivors to define and achieve research priorities. The top longer-term priorities were to study mechanisms of long-term morbidity through large cohort studies with deep phenotyping, build a harmonized global sepsis registry to facilitate enrollment in cohorts and trials, and complete detailed longitudinal follow-up to characterize the diversity of recovery experiences. This perspective reviews colloquium discussions, the identified priorities, and current initiatives to address them.