Farraye, Francis A.

Abstract Recent advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) include the use of immune modifiers and monoclonal antibodies, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors, anti-integrin agents, janus kinase inhibitors, and interleukin-12/23 inhibitors. These agents achieve higher rates of clinical remission and mucosal healing than conventional therapy. However, these therapies increase the risk of infections, including some vaccine-preventable diseases. Infections are one of the most common adverse event of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, providers should optimize immunization strategies to reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable infections in patients with IBD. There are several newly licensed vaccines recommended for adults by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This review will focus on how gastroenterology providers can implement the adult immunization schedule approved by ACIP for patients with IBD.

Abstract Stigma in patients suffering from chronic disease is associated with worse clinical outcomes and secondary medical issues such as depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life. We believe various forms of stigma can have different clinical significance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). With further insight and research, we suggest that these forms of stigma could be identified and targeted by researchers or clinicians to lessen the psychological disease burden in patients and to potentially improve their physical well-being. In the current review, we discuss public perceptions, knowledge, and stigmatization of IBD, the prevalence of various forms of IBD stigma, and the impact of such stigma on patient outcomes. We also discuss IBD disclosure, its association with stigma, and the tendencies and effects of such disclosures among youth and adult patient populations. We finish the review by highlighting possible modalities and research areas for future IBD interventions.

Abstract Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a significant effect on patients’ overall quality of life (QoL). We hypothesized that an Electronic Health Record (EHR) patient portal (EPIC’s Mychart) can be utilized to improve QoL in IBD patients and increase vaccine uptake. Methods Patients were randomized to receive specific disease (INT) information and to a control arm (CTRL) that received periodic non-IBD related messages. Disease severity was assessed using the Harvey-Bradshaw index, and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity index. QoL was measured using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Secondary outcome measures included overall satisfaction with the portal and influenza and pneumococcal vaccine uptake. Results One hundred twenty-seven patients were randomized: At baseline the CTRL group had a statistically significant higher QoL (Median SIBDQ 53.7) compared with the INT group (median SIBDQ 49.3), P = 0.04. At 6 months, the INT group had a trend towards a significantly greater increase in QoL (median SIBDQ 58) when compared with the CTRL group (median SIBDQ 57.5), P = 0.06. At 6 months more frequent portal use showed a significantly lower median SIBDQ (median 53) compared with patients with less frequent portal use (median 59), P = 0.038. At 6 months 88% of patients felt that the MyChart portal was useful with respect to IBD management. Patients had high rates of portal utilization with one-third of patients logging on weekly, and one-third logging on monthly. With respect to vaccine uptake, both influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia had higher rates of vaccine uptake. Conclusions Patients showed a trend towards improved QoL after receiving disease-specific information through our EHR portal. A significant increase in vaccine uptake was also seen. Frequent automated messages sent via an EHR portal can improve patient’s overall QoL. Larger studies will be needed to determine if automated portal reminders have a significant association with improved QoL, and furthermore to determine if there is any impact on disease activity.

Abstract Background Distinguishing Clostridioides difficile infection from colonization is challenging in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Cycle threshold (Ct), the cutoff for PCR positivity, has been investigated in non-IBD patients. Methods Patients with positive C. difficile PCR (25 IBD, 51 non-IBD) were identified retrospectively. Fifteen-day outcomes were assessed. Results Ct correlated with diarrheal days in non-IBD (P = 0.048), but not IBD patients (P = 0.769). IBD patients had shorter LOS and less severe infection, but more diarrheal days (P < 0.05). Conclusions IBD patients had a milder course but Ct results were not significant. Larger studies are needed to clarify utility of Ct in IBD.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is associated with a reduced quality of life, including a high incidence of poor sleep. Minority patients with IBD describe poorer subjective symptoms of disease. Minority patients are more likely to report poorer sleep quality compared to Caucasian patients. There are limited data on the assessment of sleep in minority patients with IBD. In this prospective cohort study, we aim to compare objective sleep parameters assessed by wrist actigraphy in minority IBD patients compared to Caucasian IBD patients. METHODS: 73 patients with a diagnosis of IBD were recruited to take part in this IRB approved study. Subjects were stratified into two cohorts by self-identification: minority subjects (Blacks and Non-Black Hispanic subjects) and Caucasian, non-minority individuals. Subjects were excluded based on significant co-morbidity, a history of a sleep disorder, or demographics which did not fit into categorized cohorts. Subjects completed sleep surveys and were provided with an accelerometer that estimated sleep patterns. Comparisons of actigraphic parameters were performed between minority and non-minority cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to determine whether minority status was independently associated with poorer sleep parameters assessed by actigraphy. Predictors that were found to be different by < 0.1 between cohorts were included in the models. RESULTS: Of the recruited subjects, 64 subjects completed 3 days of actigraphy data. 33 subjects were minority patients and 31 individuals were non-minority patients. The demographics of the cohorts are provided in Table 1. Table 2 details the univariate analyses. A higher proportion of minority patients had poorer sleep efficiency (SE) and fragmented sleep compared to Caucasian patients (90.9% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.03 and 87.8% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.02). Minority status was independently associated with both poor SE (OR: 6.41 CI: 1.48-28.17, P = 0.0139) and fragmented sleep (OR: 4.98, CI: 1.09-22.89, P = 0.0389), (Tables 3.0A and 3.0B). CONCLUSION: In our study minority subjects were found to have poorer objective measures of sleep assessed by actigraphy compared to non-minority subjects. Culturally relevant care addressing psychosocial issues, including sleep are important in the care of minority patients with IBD. Further studies investigating the role of sleep in diverse populations with IBD are warranted to determine the etiologies of poor sleep in these patients.

Abstract Pericardial involvement in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease can occur not only as an adverse event related to medical therapy but also as an extraintestinal manifestation of the disease itself. In the following case series, we describe 2 cases of pericarditis in patients diagnosed with Crohn disease. Our first case reviews the clinical presentation of acute pericarditis as an adverse event associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. In contrast, our second patient is a case of acute pericarditis as a precursor of the clinical recurrence of Crohn disease following operative resection. Pericardial disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute and subacute presentations of chest discomfort and shortness of breath in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.