Lenz, Heinz‐Josef

3586 Background: HSP90 mediated chaperoning is a well-conserved biological mechanism for stabilization and activation of kinases. More than 60% of human kinases including VEGFR, CRAF, CSF1R, and FGFR are target of HSP90 (client kinases), whereas EGFR is non-client. CDC37 is a specific co-chaperone determining selectivity of client kinases recognized by HSP90. We hypothesized that gene expression levels of CDC37 have predictive values for anti-angiogenic therapies in mCRC. Methods: The subjects of this study were mCRC patients treated with regorafenib (REGO, Japanese retrospective cohort) and those treated with bevacizumab (BEV) or cetuximab (CET) in combination with first-line chemotherapy (CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial cohort). CDC37 expression levels were measured using RNA isolated from FFPE samples by nCounter gene expression profiling (Nanostring) and HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) in the Japanese and CALGB/SWOG 80405 cohorts, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients with high CDC37 expression ( CDC37-H) and those with low expression ( CDC37-L), grouped by median cutoff value in each cohort. Results: In total, 484 patients were included (50 treated with REGO, 227 treated with BEV, and 207 treated with CET). In REGO-treated patients, CDC37-H showed significantly better OS (median 11.3 vs 6.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.54, p <0.01) and PFS (median 3.5 vs 1.9 months, adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.94, p = 0.03) compared to CDC37-L. Similarly, in BEV-treated patients, CDC37-H showed significantly better PFS (median 13.5 vs 9.6 months, adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.79, p <0.01) and numerically better OS (median 34.1 vs 29.4 months, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.11, p = 0.20) compared to CDC37-L. However, in CET-treated patients, CDC37-H and CDC37-L patients showed similar OS (median 33.7 vs 26.1 months, adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.38, p = 0.98) and PFS (median 11.3 vs 11.0 months, adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.60). Significant interaction was observed between CDC37 expression and treatment in terms of PFS in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 cohort ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our results suggest patients with CDC37-dependent ( CDC37-H) tumors may derive more benefit from REGO and BEV both of which target HSP90 client kinases or signaling pathways, but not from CET which target HSP90 non-client kinase. Further validation studies are warranted to develop a novel personalized approach for targeted therapies based on CDC37 expression in mCRC patients. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180888; Pfizer, Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00265850.

3580 Background: Monoamine oxidases (MAOs), including MAOA and MAOB, are mitochondrial enzymes responsible for catalyzing monoamine oxidation. Increased expression of MAOs were found in several cancer types and high MAOB was associated with worse disease stage and poorer survival in CRC. Positive and negative correlations of MAOB expression with mesenchymal type and epithelial type gene expressions, respectively, have been reported. Hence, we investigated whether MAOB expression is predictive for targeted therapies in mCRC. Methods: 430 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (BEV, n = 224) or cetuximab (CET, n = 206) in combination with first-line chemotherapy within the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were included in the analysis. MAOB RNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups of pts categorized by tertiles of MAOB expression into high (H), medium (M) and low (L). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed from multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, sex, location, number of metastases, KRAS, MSI status, and treatment with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Sensitivity analyses were conducted after stratifying by sex. Logrank P-values describe differences without adjustment for patient characteristics. Results: In CET-treated pts, MAOB-L showed significantly longer OS (median 39.2 vs 30.9 vs 15.9 months, logrank P = 4.7E-05, L vs H (as reference) adjusted HR 0.42, 95% CI [0.27, 0.65]) and PFS (median 13.2 vs 11.8 vs 7.6 months, logrank P = 0.006, L vs H adjusted HR 0.59 [0.40, 0.88]) compared to MAOB-M and MAOB-H, respectively. Similar results were observed when evaluating MAOB expression as a continuous variable. In BEV-treated pts, no significant differences were observed when comparing MAOB expression tertiles; however, pts with lower MAOB expression had significantly better OS, but not PFS, when evaluating MAOB as a continuous variable (Cox LRT P = 0.015, covariate adjusted). In CET-treated pts, the effect of MAOB expression was observed in male but not female pts (OS: median 40.3 vs 30.9 vs 16.1 months by MAOB-L, M, H, respectively, logrank P = 6.8E-05, L vs H adjusted HR 0.33 [0.19, 0.59]; PFS: median 13.8 vs 12.6 vs 7.9 months, logrank P = 0.001, L vs H adjusted HR 0.46 [0.28, 0.79]). A significant interaction was observed between MAOB expression and treatment for OS ( P = 0.010) in males and females combined, but only in males ( P = 0.018) when stratified by sex. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pts with MAOB-L tumors may have greater benefit from CET-based treatment and that targeting MAOB may be a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. Further validation studies are warranted to develop a novel personalized approach based on MAOB expression in mCRC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.

3572 Background: Early onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC: disease diagnosed < 50) has been increasing over the past 2 decades. Currently, standard treatment recommendations for eoCRC patients (pts) with metastatic disease does not differ from late-onset CRC (loCRC) pts although outcomes data in eoCRC pts is limited. Methods: Individual patient data on 5,761 treatment-naive metastatic eoCRC pts was pooled from 8 phase II and III randomized EGFRi studies (2000 - 2012) from the ARCAD mCRC database. The distribution of demographics, clinicopathological features, and biomarkers were summarized by age groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between age groups by stratified Cox models, adjusting for potential confounders. Predictive value of age group was evaluated by testing interaction effect between treatment and age variables based on a subset of trials with concurrent randomizations between regimens with and without EGFRi Results: eoCRC (n=756) were more evenly distributed between gender, had improved performance status (PS), increased likelihood of metastatic resection, and distant lymph node metastasis, but were less likely to have lung metastasis or KRAS mutation compared to loCRC (n=5,005, table 1). eoCRC and loCRC patients had similar distribution of primary tumor sidedness, primary resection, liver and/or peritoneal involvement, number of metastatic sites involved, and BRAF mutations (MT). No difference in PFS for eoCRC versus loCRC pts was noted (7.8 vs. 7.9 months [M], adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj], 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.11). Among pts with KRAS wild type (WT) and left sided primary tumors, univariable analysis of EGFRi demonstrated improved mPFS in loCRC (9.9 vs 8.5M, HR = 0.74, p<0.001), but this benefit was not seen in eoCRC (8.3 vs 8.9 months, HR 1.20, p=0.36). The same pattern was observed upon multivariable analysis (Table). Conclusions: In our pooled analysis, EGFRi + chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in treatment-naïve loCRC patients but not in left sided, KRAS WT, eoCRC patients. Further validation in an independent cohort is warranted. [Table: see text]

3553 Background: Higher levels of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)] are associated with better outcomes in mCRC, but underlying biologic mechanisms are unknown. Key components of the VitD metabolic pathway include CYP27B1 (encodes 1-α-hydroxylase, converts 25(OH)D to active calcitriol), VitD receptor (VDR), and CYP24A1 (encodes 24-hydroxylase, degrades calcitriol and 25(OH)D into excreted metabolites). Since these factors may affect 25(OH)D levels and potentially mediate VitD activity in mCRC, we examined the relationship between tumoral gene expression (GEx) of CYP27B1, VDR, and CYP24A and pt outcome in a study nested in a randomized phase III trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics in mCRC pts, CALGB/SWOG 80405. Methods: We determined GEx of CYP27B1, VDR, and CYP24A1 by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of archival tumor samples using the Illumina TruSeq platform. Primary endpoints were overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for prognostic and molecular characteristics. Results: 562 pts with RNA-Seq data were included. Pts with higher CYP27B1 expression (>median) were less likely to have BRAF wild type (WT) (79% vs 90%) compared to pts with lower expression (p=0.0007). Pts with higher VDR expression (>quartile 1 [Q1]) were younger (median age 59 vs 62 years; p=0.03), more likely to have left-sided (63% vs 46%; p=0.0005) and BRAF WT tumors (89% vs 70%; p<0.0001), and less likely to have RAS WT tumors (70% vs 80%; p=0.02) compared to pts with lower VDR. Pts with higher CYP24A1 expression (>median) were more likely to have left-sided tumors compared to pts with lower expression (63% vs 54%; p=0.03). On multivariable analysis, pts with higher CYP27B1 expression had significantly improved OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93; p=0.002) and PFS (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p=0.04). Higher VDR expression (up to Q1) was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91; p=0.007) but not OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.09; p=0.20). Above Q1, this improvement attenuated. Higher CYP24A1 GEx was not associated with improved OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.08; p=0.66) or PFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.08; p=0.68). We found no significant interactions between GEx of CYP27B1, VDR, or CYP24A with baseline plasma 25(OH)D levels (p for interaction ≥0.10 for all). Conclusions: Our findings suggest an association between GEx of VitD pathway markers, particularly CYP27B1 and VDR, and survival in pts with mCRC, lending biologic plausibility to a role of VitD in CRC pathogenesis. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms of action. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850 .

2538 Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a highly selective cell lineage marker with limited expression in normal gastric tissues and significantly higher expression in primary gastric, pancreatic tumors and their metastases. Anti-CLDN18.2-targeted CAR T cells, termed CT041, were developed to evaluate tumor response and patient-reported outcomes in the gastric and pancreatic cancer. Preliminary results of the trial (NCT03874897) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of about 60% in gastric cancer from a non-Western population. Here we report the results of CT041 for metastatic gastric cancer after ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy or pancreatic cancer ≥ 1 prior line from six centers in the United States. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phase Ib study (NCT04404595) investigated autologous CT041 CAR T cells in patients with CLDN18.2 positive advanced gastric (including diffuse, signet-ring) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients completed a conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and nab-paclitaxel prior to CT041 CAR T cells. The primary objective was to assess the safety, efficacy and cytokinetic profile of CT041. Adverse Events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE 5.0, and tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of February 15, 2022, 11 patients (5 gastric and 6 pancreatic) with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1- 4) were treated with CT041 at a dose between 2.5 and 4 x 108 cells. There were no dose limiting toxicities, treatment-related deaths, severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS), or severe gastrointestinal (GI) related AEs. All CRS were grade 1 or 2. Only one patient received tocilizumab. No grade 4 AEs were observed except for hematologic toxicities related to conditioning. The first eight patients were evaluable for response by the date of data cut-off: 1 patient achieved a complete response after two CT041 doses (gastric), 2 had partial response (gastric), 2 had stable disease with tumor shrinkage (pancreatic) and 3 (pancreatic) had progression of disease after an initial biochemical response. ORR was 37.5% (3/8) in all patients including 100% (3/3) in the gastric subgroup (all ≥ 3 prior lines). The last three patients had not reached the time for response assessment. CAR T cell expansion correlated with ctDNA reduction. The median duration of response and the progression-free survival had not been reached. Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that CT041 therapy was safe and had therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced GI cancers. In heavily pre-treated gastric cancer, CT041 may have significantly improved anti-tumor activity compared to historical treatment regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT04404595.

Abstract Purpose: CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial in first-line patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or both, plus chemotherapy. We tested the effect of tumor immune features on overall survival (OS). Experimental Design: Primary tumors (N = 554) were profiled by RNA sequencing. Immune signatures of macrophages, lymphocytes, TGFβ, IFNγ, wound healing, and cytotoxicity were measured. CIBERSORTx scores of naive and memory B cells, plasma cells, CD8+ T cells, resting and activated memory CD4+ T cells, M0 and M2 macrophages, and activated mast cells were measured. Results: Increased M2 macrophage score [HR, 6.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0–12.15] and TGFβ signature expression (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05–1.77) were associated with shorter OS. Increased scores of plasma cells (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38–0.87) and activated memory CD4+ T cells (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16–0.65) were associated with longer OS. Using optimal cutoffs from these four features, patients were categorized as having either 4, 3, 2, or 0–1 beneficial features associated with longer OS, and the median (95% CI) OS decreased from 42.5 (35.8–47.8) to 31.0 (28.8–34.4), 25.2 (20.6–27.9), and 17.7 (13.5–20.4) months respectively (P = 3.48e–11). Conclusions: New immune features can be further evaluated to improve patient response. They provide the rationale for more effective immunotherapy strategies.

TPS371 Background: Tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, is being developed as a novel therapy for patients (pts) with GI tumors including gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEC). While trastuzumab (Tras) with chemotherapy is standard in the 1st-line setting for metastatic HER2+ GEC, no anti-HER2 therapy has demonstrated an OS benefit over chemotherapy as 2nd-line therapy, possibly due to loss of HER2 expression following Tras-based therapy. In GEC xenograft models, dual targeting of HER2 with TUC and Tras showed superior activity to either agent alone.(Kulukian 2020) Interim results from the MOUNTAINEER study have shown promising activity for TUC and Tras for HER2+ mCRC.(Strickler 2019) The MOUNTAINEER-02 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of TUC with Tras, ramucirumab (Ram), and paclitaxel (Pac) in pts with HER2+ GEC in the 2nd-line setting. Methods: MOUNTAINEER-02 (NCT04499924) is a phase 2/3 study evaluating TUC + Tras with Ram and Pac. Pts receive TUC 300 mg or placebo PO BID, Tras (6 then 4 mg/kg) or placebo (IV on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle), Pac (IV on Days 1, 8, 15), and Ram (IV on Days 1 and 15). Eligible pts have locally-advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEC and have received a HER2-directed antibody and 1 prior line of therapy for advanced disease. Pts must be ≥18 years of age, with an ECOG ≤1, and have had no prior exposure to Ram, anti-HER2 or anti-EGFR TKI, HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, or taxanes ≤12 months before enrollment. Due to the potential impact of TUC on Pac metabolism, the study will include an initial Pac dose optimization stage. The open-label phase 2 part will determine the recommended dose of Pac (60 or 80 mg/m²) combined with TUC, Tras, and Ram in 6-18 pts, and evaluate safety and activity of the regimen in Cohorts 2A and 2B (30 pts each). The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 part will compare the efficacy and safety of TUC and Tras (Arm 3A; ̃235 pts) vs. placebo (Arm 3B; ̃235 pts), both in combination with Ram and Pac, and also evaluate activity of TUC with Ram and Pac (Arm 3C; ̃30 pts). The dual primary phase 3 endpoints are OS and PFS per investigator, with confirmed ORR as a key secondary endpoint. HER2 status is determined at baseline using a blood-based NGS assay, and IHC/ISH of fresh or archival tumor biopsies, if available. Pts must be HER2+ by blood-based NGS in Cohort 2A and phase 3; in Cohort 2B, pts must be HER2+ in a biopsy taken post-progression during/after 1st-line therapy, but HER2-negative by blood-based NGS. Disease assessments per RECISTv1.1 will occur q6 weeks for 36 weeks, then q9 weeks. The pharmacokinetics of TUC, Pac, and their metabolites will be evaluated in a subset of pts, including a cohort with gastrectomies. Enrollment in phase 2 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04499924.

TPS213 Background: Regorafenib (R) is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks several protein kinases involved in angiogenesis and oncogenesis; it has a survival benefit in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The current standard (std) treatment in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype (WT) mCRC is sequential treatment with an anti-EGFR antibody (AEA) followed by R. However, R, which is orally administered once daily, may be more convenient and thus preferable for pts than AEA. REVERCE, a Japanese trial, demonstrated a significant 5.8 month (mo.) survival benefit with regorafenib administered prior to AEA compared to the std sequence. Based off these findings, the proposed phase II trial is to confirm the observed survival benefit from regorafenib sequencing prior to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in REVERCE in a US patient population. Methods: REVERCEII is an Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network-led randomized phase II study of R (dose escalation from 80mg to 160mg based on tolerance) prior to AEA (R+AEA) compared to standard sequencing (AEA+R) in pts with refractory RAS WT mCRC. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive R (Arm A) vs. AEA (with or without irinotecan per investigator choice) (Arm B). At the time of disease progression or intolerance, patients will receive sequential treatment until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG ≤ 2, acceptable organ function, and patients must have had prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and no prior AEA nor R. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, between evaluable patients (eligible, consented, started protocol treatment) who were randomized to R+AEA (arm A) and AEA+R (arm B). With 83 OS events, we have 87% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 9 months to 14.5 mo., assuming 1-sided significance level of 0.15, and exponential distribution. The total sample size is 124 patients. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response, and adverse events. The total study duration is expected to be 3 years. Clinical trial information: NCT04117945. Clinical trial information: 04117945.

193 Background: Enhanced understanding of the evolving clonal architecture under treatment stress is crucial to optimizing care and developing effective therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Emergence of genomic alterations (GAs) [mutations (muts) and amplifications (amps)] in RAS, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, and MET have been recognized as key resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapy in later lines in mCRC. Data regarding occurrence of these GAs under selective pressure in the first line setting is lacking. Methods: CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized trial of bevacizumab (bev) vs cetuximab (cet) in first line mCRC. Patients (pts) with paired plasma samples (pre-treatment and post-progression) available for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing were included in this substudy. Sequencing of ctDNA was performed by Guardant360 assay in a CLIA-certified environment to detect GAs in 73 genes. RAS/BRAF status [mut vs. wild type (wt)] was based on clonal muts [pre-defined cutoff of relative MAF (rMAF) ≥ 25%] in ctDNA. Only samples with ≥1 GA were analyzed to minimize false negatives. The primary objective was to determine and compare prevalence of acquired GAs between study arms: bev (anti-VEGF) and cet (anti-EGFR). Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test were used. Results: Baseline characteristics of ctDNA cohort were similar to the 80405 population. Among 133 randomized RAS/BRAF wt pts, 11 (15.3%) and 5 (8.2%) developed acquired GAs (OR 2.0, P = 0.29), in bev and cet arm, respectively. Key comparative data for pts with regard to acquired pathogenic GAs are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this randomized mCRC cohort, the ctDNA profile of acquired GAs with front line anti-EGFR chemotherapy appears to be strikingly distinct from that seen with later lines of therapy. Acquisition of GAs, classically associated with EGFR resistance in later line, was not only rare with upfront cet-chemotherapy but also comparable to bev-containing (anti-VEGF) regimen. The mechanisms of acquired resistance appear to differ when anti-EGFR therapy is administered in combination with highly active first line chemotherapy. Our findings have critical translational relevance to the timing and value of ctDNA-guided anti-EGFR rechallenge in mCRC pts, especially in those treated with anti-EGFR therapy upfront.[Table: see text]