Jamshed, Saad

Abstract Introduction: The detection of abnormal protein bands (APB) different from the original monoclonal protein in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent stem cell transplantation and/or chemotherapy has been reported. These atypical serum immunofixation patterns may be monoclonal (also termed secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) or oligoclonal bands (OB). The prognostic significance of this phenomenon remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize and analyze the evidence for the association between APB with survival in MM patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Medline-Ovid, CINAHL, and ERIC, was conducted using relevant search terms. All studies were screened using predefined selection criteria and critically appraised for quality assessment following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. All studies that described the presence of APB, defined as monoclonal spike with heavy or light chain immunoglobulin distinct from the original paraprotein at initial diagnosis of MM, and its associations with survival were included. Studies that reported multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were further included for meta-analysis. Random-effects model was used to synthesize the pooled HR estimate for the association of APB with survival. Cochran's Q statistics and I2 tests were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Results: A total of 24 out of 181 eligible studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Four studies (including 1115 patients) that reported HR estimates were included in the final meta-analysis. The random-effect summary HR for the progression-free survival among patients with APB was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.31-0.65) with no statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%, p=0.93). The pooled HR for the association with overall survival was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14-0.66) with moderate statistical heterogeneity (I2=45%; p=0.16) for patients with APB. One study (Silva et al, 2017) only included patients with at least very good partial response while the other three studies reported similar findings of higher occurrence of APB with complete response (Tovar et al, 2013; Jo et al, 2014; Zou et al, 2014). These results are also consistent with the presumed association of APB with complete response as suggested in other studies included in qualitative review. Conclusions: This study indicated a potential prognostic value of APB for favorable outcomes in the context of both overall and progression-free survival in MM patients after treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the sole emergence of APB irrespective of treatment response. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jamshed: Takeda: Honoraria.

Introduction: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Immunosuppression is one of the risk factors for CDI. However, most of the trials evaluating efficacy of FMT have excluded immunocompromised patients. Patients with hematological cancers represent a major class of immunocompromised patients. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of FMT in patients with hematological cancer for the treatment of recurrent CDI. Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from January 2000 up to December 2018. Articles included for meta-analysis were case series and case reports that assessed efficacy of FMT in hematological cancer patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The main outcomes were pooled proportions of patients achieving cure after first FMT. The cure rate was defined as resolution of diarrhea without any recurrence. Results: 10 studies (5 case series and 5 case reports) were included in the analysis, making up 29 patients who underwent 38 total FMT procedures. The follow up period ranged from 1- 14 months. Of the included patients, 17 had leukemia, 10 had lymphoma and 2 patients had multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome each. 7 of these patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The pooled cure rate was 82% [confidence interval (CI) 67-94%] after 1 FMT with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Minor publication bias was seen on visual inspection of funnel plot. FMT was generally well tolerated by these patients. No serious side effects were reported in any study. One of the studies reported death due to cardiac arrest 5 days after FMT which was thought to be unrelated to the procedure. Mild side effects including mild abdominal pain, transient diarrhea, fecal urgency, constipation and nausea were reported in 5 patients. Conclusion: Based on limited observational data, FMT seems to be an effective and safe modality for management of recurrent CDI in patients with hematological cancers. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed to establish its safety as a first line therapy for recurrent CDI in this population. Figure Disclosures Jamshed: Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Khanna:Rebiotix, Inc: Research Funding; Probio Tech, LLC: Consultancy; Facile Therapeutics: Consultancy; Shire, Plc: Consultancy.

Abstract Introduction: C. difficile infection (CDI) is a common nosocomial infection. Immune suppression is thought to be a major risk factor for CDI. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients represent a major subgroup of immunologically vulnerable patients. It is unclear if these patients have novel risk factors for CDI development. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the predictors of CDI in HSCT recipients. Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from January 2000 up to June 2018. All studies that assessed risk factors associated with CDI development in HSCT recipients were eligible for inclusion. Data on clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with CDI development were collected. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models and pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk factors reported in ≥ 2 studies were calculated. Results: Overall, 17 studies, including 6328 HSCT patients were included. Of those 874 patients developed CDI. The rate of CDI development in these patients was 13.81% with a follow up ranging from 1- 36 months. A total of 34 different risk factors were studied, of which 20 were identified in ≥ 2 studies. Our analysis showed that cephalosporin use (Odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.87), cord blood transplant (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83), graft versus host disease (GVHD) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.48) & prior hospitalization within 90 days of HSCT (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.21-2.83) were associated with statistically significant increased risk of CDI in HSCT patients (Figure 1). On the other hand, many characteristics of HSCT patients including age, diabetes, lung disease, fluoroquinolones, proton pump inhibitors, rituximab, mucositis, myeloablative therapy, melphalan use before BMT, total body irradiation, growth factor use during admission, neutropenia, autologous vs allogenic transplant and use of matched related donor were not associated with increased risk of CDI. Conclusion: HSCT recipients are at an increased risk of CDI compared to general population. In addition to the common risk factors like cephalosporin use and prior hospitalization, these patients have novel characteristics including presence of GVHD and cord blood transplant that puts them at a higher risk of CDI. HSCT patients with these risk factors may warrant a closer surveillance for early detection and treatment of CDI. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

e18244 Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has higher incidence in cancer patients. To characterize the extent of CDI burden among hematologic cancer patients, we used the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) to report the incidence and outcomes of CDI. Methods: NHDS data from 2001-2010 were analyzed using diagnosis codes to identify patients with hematologic cancers and CDI. Demographics and discharge information were compared amongst hematologic cancer patients with and without CDI. Logistic regression models were runto estimate the impact of CDI on hematologic cancer patient outcomes, using STATA 12.0. Results: During the years 2001-2010, about 3.7 million patients (weighted data) were discharged with hematologic cancer. Among them, the incidence of CDI was 2.3%. Hematologic cancer patients with CDI were younger (mean age 66 vs 68 years), more likely to be men (66% vs 64.5%), to be of white race (68.1% vs 67.7%) and to have emergent admissions (73% vs 69%), all p values < 0.001. CDI incidence in these patients showed a steeper increase than non-cancer patients, with highest incidence in 2008-2009. Hematologic cancer patients with CDI had a longer mean Length of stay (16.9 vs 7.1 days; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 9.5, 95% CI 9.4-9.6), all cause hospital mortality (11.3% vs 6.3%; aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.88-1.97) and discharge to a care facility (28.4% vs 18.8%; aOR 2.06, 95% CI 2.02-2.10) compared to non-CDI cancer patients. Conclusions: CDI incidence is higher in patients with hematologic malignancy. They also have worse outcomes including overall mortality, longer hospitalizations and discharge to healthcare facility. These patients warrant closer screening and prompt treatment of CDI as they are at greater risk of unfavorable outcomes. [Table: see text]