Cox, Charles E.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo conduct an economic evaluation of a group mindfulness program compared to an education support program for breast cancer survivors (BCS).MethodsThe cost‐utility analysis (cost per quality‐adjusted life year [QALY]) was performed from a single‐center randomized controlled trial in the United States. Data from 181 BCS were included in the analysis (91 from the mindfulness‐based stress reduction for breast cancer, MBSR(BC) and 90 from the Breast Cancer Education Support, (BCES)). Analyses were conducted from two perspectives: societal and healthcare system. The EuroQol EQ‐5D‐5L was used to measure quality of life and the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) was used to measure health services utilization from baseline through 26 weeks. The impact of MBSR(BC) on health services utilization and costs was estimated with generalized linear models.ResultsIn the reference case analyses (societal perspective), the average total cost in the MBSR(BC) group was $5744 compared with $6140 in the BCES group. At the end of follow‐up, the MBSR(BC) group dominated BCES in terms of Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR), with MBSR(BC) providing an incremental cost of −$541 (95% CI: −$3400, $2318) and a 0.021 QALY (95% CI: −0.014, 0.055). Net monetary benefit (NMB) analysis showed that MBSR(BC) has a higher probability of achieving positive NMB across a range of possible societal willingness‐to‐pay for improving quality of life.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MBSR(BC) is likely to be cost‐effective for breast cancer survivors over 6 months. Cost savings primarily resulted from reduced ER and hospital admissions and tests.

TPS3155 Background: Genomic signatures are revolutionizing the definition, identification, and treatment of breast cancer. To precisely stratify breast cancers into actionable subgroups, full genome expression data and matching clinical data must be aggregated into a large data set. Such a data set will accelerate research and discovery, especially for smaller patient subsets who are not as widely represented within the current body of literature. Methods: FLEX is a multicenter, prospective, population-based, observational trial for patients with Stage I, II, and III breast cancer. All patients with stage I to III breast cancer who receive MammaPrint, with or without BluePrint on a primary breast tumor are eligible for enrollment. The study’s primary aim is to create a large scale, population-based registry of full genome expression data matched with clinical data to investigate new gene associations with prognostic and/or predictive value. Secondary objectives include utilizing the shared study infrastructure to examine and generate hypotheses for targeted subset analyses and/or trials based on full genome expression data. The design of FLEX allows targeted sub-studies and sub-analyses to be added as appendices after the initial baseline study is opened. Patients enrolled in the initial study are also eligible for inclusion in sub-studies where they meet all criteria and additional consent is not required. Additional clinical data will be collected as specified in the appendix protocols. The FLEX collaborative platform allows participating investigators the opportunity to author their own sub-study protocols, as approved by the FLEX Steering Committee of their peers. 13 sub-studies have already been identified and are under development. Eligibility: The study will enroll a minimum of 10000 patients aged ≥18 years with histologically proven invasive stage I-III breast cancer who signed informed consent. Enrollment began April 2017 and 1506 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03053193.