Back to Authors

Hanson, Temperance J. Scheffler

Mayo Clinic

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology,

Citations 2

Culture media composition influences patient-derived organoid ability to predict therapeutic responses in gastrointestinal cancers
Hogenson, Tara L. , Phillips, William J. , Toruner, Merih Deniz , Li, Jing , Horn, Isaac P. , Kennedy, Devin J. , Almada, Luciana L. , Marks, David L. , Törüner, Murat , Sigafoos, Ashley N. , Koenig-Kappes, Amanda N., Olson, Rachel , Tolosa, Ezequiel J. , Bleeker, Jonathan , Barrett, Michael T. , Boyum, James H. , Kipp, Benjamin R. , Hanson, Temperance J. Scheffler, Petersen, Gloria M. , Dasari, Surendra , Oberg, Ann L. , Truty, Mark J. , Levy, Michael J. , Zhu, Mojun, Billadeau, Daniel D. , Adjei, Alex A. , Dusetti, Nelson , Iovanna, J., Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Toruner, Merih D., Doles, Jason D. , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Toruner, Merih D , Xie, Hao , Phillips, William J. , Carr, Ryan M , Koenig-Kappes, A., Zhang, Cheng , Li, Hu , Mahipal, Amit , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Graham, Rondell P. , Wee, Wen

JCI Insight | October 18, 2022 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 22 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci.insight.158060 Get It

BACKGROUND A patient-derived organoid (PDO) platform may serve as a promising tool for translational cancer research. In this study, we evaluated PDO’s ability to predict clinical response to gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS We generated PDOs from primary and metastatic lesions of patients with GI cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. We compared PDO response with the observed clinical response for donor patients to the same treatments. RESULTS We report an approximately 80% concordance rate between PDO and donor tumor response. Importantly, we found a profound influence of culture media on PDO phenotype, where we showed a significant difference in response to standard-of-care chemotherapies, distinct morphologies, and transcriptomes between media within the same PDO cultures. CONCLUSION While we demonstrate a high concordance rate between donor tumor and PDO, these studies also showed the important role of culture media when using PDOs to inform treatment selection and predict response across a spectrum of GI cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable. FUNDING The Joan F. & Richard A. Abdoo Family Fund in Colorectal Cancer Research, GI Cancer program of the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic SPORE in Pancreatic Cancer, Center of Individualized Medicine (Mayo Clinic), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Mayo Clinic), Incyte Pharmaceuticals and Mayo Clinic Hepatobiliary SPORE, University of Minnesota-Mayo Clinic Partnership, and the Early Therapeutic program (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic).
Patient-derived organoid (PDO), a new personalized therapy selection tool for prompt clinical decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal (mGI) cancer patients.
Hogenson, Tara L. , Horn, Isaac P. , Almada, Luciana L. , Marks, David I. , Koenig, Amanda, Barrett, Michael T. , Boyum, James H. , Hanson, Temperance J. Scheffler, Yin, Jun , Petersen, Gloria M. , Revzin, Alexander , Billadeau, Daniel D. , Adjei, Alex A. , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Xie, Hao , Tolosa, Ezequiel J. , Mahipal, Amit , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Wee, Wen

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3101-3101

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3101 Get It

3101 Background: PDO is a promising translational tool that recapitulates the biology and drug response of donor cancer patient. However, an unmet need is to have PDO drug-screening data available for treatment decision making in clinic. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether PDO testing results will be available at critical treatment decision points in metastatic GI cancer patients. Methods: Metastatic GI cancer patients undergoing core-needle biopsy were eligible. Tumor cells isolated from ≤4 fresh biopsy tissues were grown in a Matrigel-based culture. PDO response to anti-cancer drugs were evaluated; and when available, correlated with donors’ clinical response to the same agent(s). PDO response was defined as IC50 < 0.1 × published Cmax of the drug clinically; stable as IC50 between 0.1 to 10 × Cmax. Radiographic response was per RECIST criteria. Results: We enrolled 27 refractory metastatic GI cancer patients (9 colorectal [CRC], 9 pancreas, and 9 biliary tract). Median lines of therapy were 4, 2, and 2; the success rate of organoid establishment was 89%, 44%, and 55%, respectively. The median time from biopsy to availability of drug-testing data was 64 days (range: 24 to 93 days). The median time from biopsy to next CT re-staging in donors was 64 days. The established PDOs shared histological and genomic features with donor clinical tissue. PDO and clinical responses to the same agent(s) were correlated in 2 CRC donors including (1) BRAFV600E-mutated PDO responded to vemurafenib + panitumumab, as did the donor who had partial response (PDO drug-testing data were available 55 days post-biopsy, 23 days prior to restaging scan); (2) KRAS/FGF-dual amplified PDO had stable disease status to regorafenib, as did the biopsied lesion from the donor (73 days post-biopsy, 5 days post-scan). Conclusions: We showed the feasibility of completing PDO drug sensitivity testing in metastatic GI cancer patients within a short time that could impact clinical decision making, particularly in CRC. PDO drug response showed correlation with clinical response. With further refinement, PDO can be a powerful tool for personalizing cancer therapy in metastatic GI cancer patients.