Abstract Dynamic measures of resilience—the ability to resist and recover from a challenge—may be informative of the rate of aging before overt manifestations such as chronic disease, disability, and frailty. From this perspective mid-life resilience may predict longevity and late-life health. To test this hypothesis, we developed simple, reproducible, clinically relevant challenges, and outcome measures of physical resilience that revealed differences between and within age groups of genetically heterogeneous mice, and then examined associations between mid-life resilience and both lifespan and late-life measures of physiological function. We demonstrate that time to recovery from isoflurane anesthesia and weight change following a regimen of chemotherapy significantly differed among young, middle-aged, and older mice, and were more variable in older mice. Females that recovered faster than the median time from anesthesia (more resilient) at 12 months of age lived 8% longer than their counterparts, while more resilient males in mid-life exhibited better cardiac (fractional shortening and left ventricular volumes) and metabolic (glucose tolerance) function at 24 months of age. Moreover, female mice with less than the median weight loss at Day 3 of the cisplatin challenge lived 8% longer than those that lost more weight. In contrast, females who had more weight loss between Days 15 and 20 were relatively protected against early death. These data suggest that measures of physical resilience in mid-life may provide information about individual differences in aging, lifespan, and key parameters of late-life health.
Physical Resilience as a Determinant of Healthy Aging
Physical resilience, defined as the ability to resist and respond to challenges and return to homeostasis, has been postulated to be a determinant of healthspan and lifespan. To test this premise, we have begun to optimize a standardized, clinically relevant battery of resilience challenges, including anesthesia and cisplatin chemotherapy, and recovery outcome measures in younger (2–3 month) and older (26–29 month) mice. We have also started to test whether interventions shown to increase murine lifespan‐acarbose, rapamycin, and 17a‐estradiol‐impact the resilience of older mice. Our preliminary data demonstrate that younger mice (n = 10) have faster dorsal to sternal recumbence recovery time compared to older mice (n = 8) (39 ± 1 sec vs. 67 ± 6 sec, p < 0.001) following a 5‐minute 4% isoflurane anesthesia challenge. In response to a 5‐day cisplatin (2 mg/kg/day) challenge, both younger (n=5) and older (n=4) mice lost a significant percent of their baseline body weight (younger mice −10.6 ± 0.8% and older mice −13.2 ± 2.1%, p = 0.26), however, older mice failed to regain body weight 11 days after the challenge (younger mice −0.9 ± 0.8% and older mice −9.8 ± 0.8%, p < 0.01). Changes in body weight in younger and older mice were largely attributable to the loss/regain of fat mass. Interestingly, 8 weeks of either acarbose (1,000 ppm) or 17α‐estradiol (14.4 ppm) administration to older female mice improved body weight recovery after the cisplatin challenge, while rapamycin (14 ppm) had no appreciable effect. Our preliminary results demonstrate that younger mice, as expected, have greater resilience than older mice to clinically relevant physical challenges. The age at which physical resilience starts to decline requires further investigation. Our early observations suggest interventions that extend health‐ and lifespan may impact resilience in older mice. Ultimately, a standardized battery of resilience challenges may provide a new framework for testing and translating interventions that target the fundamental biology of aging. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by grant AG52958 from the National Institutes of Health. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Twin Talk Series: A novel method to foster peer‐to‐peer pedagogical training
Mayo Clinic annually trains over 1000 predoctoral students and postdoctoral research fellows in medicine and biomedical sciences. However, training opportunities are limited for those interested in teaching and mentoring methodologies. Therefore, Mayo Clinic predoctoral students sought to provide trainee‐led learning opportunities for fellow trainees. A survey was sent to all Mayo Clinic predoctoral and postdoctoral trainees to determine preferences for pedagogy education formats. In response to survey results, the Twin Talk Series was developed. A Twin Talk is a set of one‐hour talks comprised of a Take‐in session and one or more Try‐out session(s). At the Take‐in session, a content expert discusses a pedagogical technique, and at the following Try‐out session(s), trainee volunteers practice the technique among themselves. Eight Twin Talks have been organized to date on several teaching techniques and pedagogical development topics. The impact of each Twin Talk, including understanding, format, and interest level, was evaluated through survey tools. Survey results suggested trainees favored in‐person pedagogy expert presenters during the Take‐in session over video conferences. Furthermore, modeling of the teaching technique by the expert presenter during the Take‐in session was well‐received. However, participation in the follow‐up Try‐out practice session was limited. Overall, the Twin Talk Series is a promising method for trainee‐led, peer‐to‐peer pedagogy education, particularly at institutions with limited access to pedagogical resources. The Twin Talk Series will continue to be refined to increase trainee participation, particularly in the follow‐up Try‐out sessions, and to provide relevant opportunities for trainees to practice teaching. Support or Funding Information Mayo Foundation of Medical Education and Research This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
The senescence-associated secretome as an indicator of age and medical risk
Produced by senescent cells, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) is a potential driver of age-related dysfunction. We tested whether circulating concentrations of SASP proteins reflect age and medical risk in humans. We first screened senescent endothelial cells, fibroblasts, preadipocytes, epithelial cells, and myoblasts to identify candidates for human profiling. We then tested associations between circulating SASP proteins and clinical data from individuals throughout the life span and older adults undergoing surgery for prevalent but distinct age-related diseases. A community-based sample of people aged 20–90 years (retrospective cross-sectional) was studied to test associations between circulating SASP factors and chronological age. A subset of this cohort aged 60–90 years and separate cohorts of older adults undergoing surgery for severe aortic stenosis (prospective longitudinal) or ovarian cancer (prospective case-control) were studied to assess relationships between circulating concentrations of SASP proteins and biological age (determined by the accumulation of age-related health deficits) and/or postsurgical outcomes. We showed that SASP proteins were positively associated with age, frailty, and adverse postsurgery outcomes. A panel of 7 SASP factors composed of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), TNF receptor superfamily member 6 (FAS), osteopontin (OPN), TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), ACTIVIN A, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (CCL3), and IL-15 predicted adverse events markedly better than a single SASP protein or age. Our findings suggest that the circulating SASP may serve as a clinically useful candidate biomarker of age-related health and a powerful tool for interventional human studies.
Late‐life time‐restricted feeding and exercise differentially alter healthspan in obesity
AbstractAging and obesity increase multimorbidity and disability risk, and determining interventions for reversing healthspan decline is a critical public health priority. Exercise and time‐restricted feeding (TRF) benefit multiple health parameters when initiated in early life, but their efficacy and safety when initiated at older ages are uncertain. Here, we tested the effects of exercise versus TRF in diet‐induced obese, aged mice from 20 to 24 months of age. We characterized healthspan across key domains: body composition, physical, metabolic, and cardiovascular function, activity of daily living (ADL) behavior, and pathology. We demonstrate that both exercise and TRF improved aspects of body composition. Exercise uniquely benefited physical function, and TRF uniquely benefited metabolism, ADL behavior, and circulating indicators of liver pathology. No adverse outcomes were observed in exercised mice, but in contrast, lean mass and cardiovascular maladaptations were observed following TRF. Through a composite index of benefits and risks, we conclude the net healthspan benefits afforded by exercise are more favorable than those of TRF. Extrapolating to obese older adults, exercise is a safe and effective option for healthspan improvement, but additional comprehensive studies are warranted before recommending TRF.