Dziggel, Liesa

Abstract Background Radiotherapy of breast cancer can be associated with dermatitis. Grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis can be painful and impair the patients’ quality of life. To reduce the risk of this complication, patients have to perform skin care several times each day. This may require a considerable level of compliance. This randomized DAI-BREAC trial investigates whether a mobile application reminding the patients four times per day to perform skin care (reminder app) will contribute to reduction of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis. Methods This multinational, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial compares standard skin care supported by a reminder app (Arm A) versus standard skin care alone (Arm B) regarding grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. The effect of the app will be considered clinically relevant, if the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis is reduced from 25.4% (rate identified in a preceding study) to 15%. A total of 134 patients per arm including drop-outs are required. Secondary aims include pain (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction with the app (questionnaire), impact of the app on the use of health technology (questionnaire), and benefit from support (coaching) by staff members regarding the use of the app (questionnaire). Discussion If reminder app contributes to a decrease of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for breast cancer, it will likely become a useful instrument for these patients. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06483477; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT06483477). Registered on 1st of July, 2024. First patient is planned to be included in September 2024.

2075 Background: This study was performed to create and validate scoring systems to estimate survival and intracerebral local control at 6 months of patients irradiated for brain metastases. Methods: Data of 1,797 patients irradiated for brain metastases (1,346 whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT], 131 radiosurgery [RS], 61 WBRT + RS, 259 resection + WBRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned to the test group (N = 1,198) or the validation group (N = 599). In the test group, multivariate analyses (MVA, Cox proportional hazards model) were performed for survival (OS) and local control (LC). Based on the MVA results, two scoring systems were developed, one for OS and another for LC. The scores included the prognostic factors found significant on MVA. Age, performance status, extracranial metastases, interval from tumor diagnosis to RT, and number of brain metastases were significant for OS. Tumor type, performance status, interval from tumor diagnosis to RT, and number of brain metastases were significant for LC. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month OS or LC rate (%) by 10. The total score represented the sum of the scores for each factor. For OS, total scores ranged from 15–30 points, and patients were divided into three groups (15–19, 20–25, and 26–30 points). For LC, total scores ranged from 14–27 points, and patients were divided into three groups (14–18, 19–23, and 24–27 points). Results: In the test group, the 6-month OS rates were 9 ± 1% for patients with scores of 15–19 points, 41 ± 2% for those with 20–25 points, and 78 ± 2% for those with 26–30 points (p < 0.0001). The corresponding OS rates in the validation group were 7 ± 2%, 39 ± 3%, and 79 ± 3%, respectively (p < 0.0001).In the test group, the 6-month LC rates were 17 ± 3% for patients with 14–18 points, 49 ± 3% for those with 19–23 points, and 77 ± 2% for those with 24–27 points (p < 0.0001). The corresponding LC rates in the validation group were 19 ± 4%, 52 ± 4%, and 77 ± 3%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients irradiated for brain metastases can be grouped with these scores to estimate OS and LC. The OS and LC rates of the validation group were almost identical to the test group, which demonstrates the high validity and reproducibility of both scores. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Background Previous survival scores for breast cancer patients with cerebral metastases were developed in cohorts receiving heterogeneous treatments, which could have introduced selection biases. A new instrument (WBRT-30-BC) was created from 170 patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone with 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Methods Characteristics showing significant associations (p < 0.05) with overall survival (OS) or a trend (p < 0.08) on multivariate analysis were used for the WBRT-30-BC. For each characteristic, 6-month OS rates were divided by 10. These scoring points were added for each patient (patient scores). The WBRT-30-BC was compared to the diagnosis- specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) classification and Rades-Score for breast cancer regarding positive predictive values (PPVs) to identify patients dying within 6 months and patients surviving at least 6 months following WBRT. Results On multivariate analysis, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was significant (risk ratio [RR]: 2.45, p < 0.001). In addition, extra-cerebral metastatic disease (RR: 1.52, p = 0.071) and time between breast cancer diagnosis and WBRT (RR: 1.37, p = 0.070) showed a trend. Based on these three characteristics, four predictive groups were designed: 7–9, 10–12, 13–15 and 16 points. Six-month OS rates were 8%, 41%, 68% and 100% (p < 0.001). PPVs to identify patients dying within 6 months were 92% (WBRT-30-BC), 84% (DS-GPA) and 92% (Rades-Score). PPVs to identify patients surviving for at least 6 months were 100% (WBRT-30-BC), 74% (DS-GPA) and 68% (Rades-Score). Conclusions The WBRT-30-BC appeared very accurate in predicting death ≤ 6 months and survival ≥ 6 months of breast cancer patients receiving WBRT. It was superior to previous instruments in predicting survival ≥ 6 months.