Back to Authors

Yu, Jennifer S.

0000-0002-0244-4014

Mayo Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Citations 1

Management for Different Glioma Subtypes: Are All Low-Grade Gliomas Created Equal?
Tom, Martin C. , Buckner, Jan C. , Dietrich, Jörg , Parsons, Michael , Yu, Jennifer S. , Parsons, Michael W , Cahill, Daniel P.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book | May 17, 2019 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 39 | Pages: 133-145

10.1200/edbk_238353 Get It

Following the identification of key molecular alterations that provided superior prognostication and led to the updated 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumor Classification, the understanding of glioma behavior has rapidly evolved. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 are present in the majority of adult grade 2 and 3 gliomas, and when used in conjunction with 1p/19q codeletion for classification, the prognostic distinction between grade 2 versus grade 3 is diminished. As such, the previously often used term of “low-grade glioma,” which referred to grade 2 gliomas, has now been replaced by the phrase “lower-grade glioma” to encompass both grade 2 and 3 tumors. Additional molecular characterization is ongoing to even further classify this heterogeneous group of tumors. With such a colossal shift in the understanding of lower-grade gliomas, management of disease is being redefined in the setting of emerging molecular-genetic biomarkers. In this article, we review recent progress and future directions regarding the surgical, radiotherapeutic, chemotherapeutic, and long-term management of adult lower-grade gliomas.