Snow, Craig

10503 Background: Prior data suggests that the risk of second primary breast cancer (SPBC) is higher among women diagnosed with primary breast cancer (BC) before age 40. There is evidence that risk differs by primary tumor characteristics, cancer treatments, and genetic predisposition. However, studies investigating risk of SPBC by clinical risk factors are often limited by low numbers of young women and lack of complete patient data, particularly regarding germline genetic risk. Methods: Using the Young Women’s BC Study (YWS), a prospective cohort of 1,302 women ≤40 years diagnosed with BC from 2006-2016, we sought to compare clinical and treatment characteristics among women who developed an SPBC vs. those who did not. The analytic cohort included women diagnosed with Stage 0-III BC who did not undergo bilateral mastectomy (N = 685). Demographics, genetic testing and results, clinical events, and treatment data were collected through self-report on baseline and follow-up surveys (every 6 months for 3 years, then annually). Detailed tumor and treatment information, confirmation of genetic testing results, and new and recurrent cancer events were obtained through regular and triggered medical record review. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of age, race, genetic testing results, hormone receptor status, stage, and grade of primary tumor, and cancer treatments with SPBC. Participants were censored at the time of local recurrence, metastasis, death, or loss of follow-up. Results: At a median follow-up time of 9.9 years [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 6.6-12.0 y], 17 patients developed an SPBC (2.5%), in whom 3 occurred in the ipsilateral breast after lumpectomy as primary BC surgery. Median time from primary BC diagnosis to SPBC diagnosis was 4.2 years (IQR = 3.3-5.6 y). Compared to those who did not develop an SPBC, a greater percentage of women who developed an SPBC had in situ disease as their primary BC (24% v. 6%) and were of Ashkenazi descent (12% v. 5%). In the 577 women who had had genetic testing, 544 (94%) were non-carriers of pathogenic variants. Risk of SPBC was 2.2% (N = 12) in non-carriers and 9.1% (N = 3) in the 33 carriers. In Cox univariate analyses, carriers had a 4.1 times higher risk of SPBC compared to non-carriers (HR = 4.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.67-14.66, p = 0.03), and primary diagnosis with in situ BC was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of SPBC (HR = 5.02, 95% CI = 1.63-15.41, p = 0.005). Both factors remained strongly associated with SPBC when tested together in a multivariate model. Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrated a low risk of SPBC in the first 10 years after diagnosis of early BC in young women who are not germline pathogenic variant carriers. The finding that risk of SPBC was higher after in situ primary BC at a young age warrants further investigation. These findings have important implications for the treatment and follow-up care of young women with BC.

505 Background: Increased TILs are associated with better prognosis in triple-negative BC, including in patients (pts) age < 40. However, the role of TILs remains unclear in HR+/HER2- BC and little data exist in young pts, in whom immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host/tumor differences. We assessed the extent and composition of immune infiltration in HR+ tumors of young women and correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. Methods: From a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed age ≤40, we identified those with stage I-III HR+/HER2- BC and available pre-treatment (tx) tumor tissue. Multiplexed immunofluorescence was used to quantify cytotoxic T (CD8+), T helper (Th, CD3+CD8-), T regulatory (Tregs, FOXP3+CD3+) and exhausted T (PD1+CD8+) cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses tested associations between clinicopathologic variables and immune markers by high or low expression, divided based on median. High vs. low TILs were evaluated in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In 390 pts, median age was 37 years (21-40), most had grade 2 (51%), T1 (65%), N0 (63%) tumors and 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Black pts (n = 17) had higher expression of stromal CD8+ ( P= .010), FOXP3+CD3+ ( P= .027) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .043); intratumoral TILs did not differ by race. Older age (36-40) was associated with high expression of CD8+ ( P= .033) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .031) within stroma and CD3+CD8- TILs within tumor ( P= .046). Grade 3 tumors had higher stromal and intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- ( P= .002; P< .001) and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs ( P= .020; P< .001). No differences in TILs were seen according to recency of pregnancy, BRCA1/2 status or T/N stage. Over a median follow up of 8 years, 85 iBCFS events, 64 DDFS events and 37 deaths occurred. High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.49, P= .002) and DDFS (HR 0.57, P= .046), which remained significant when adjusted for T/N stage, grade and chemotherapy (iBCFS HR 0.41, P< .001; DDFS HR 0.45, P= .008). High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better OS (HR 0.47, P= .038) and iBCFS (HR 0.58, P= .018), respectively, on adjusted analyses only. High intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.59, P= .025; HR 0.63, P= .043) after adjustment only. Conclusions: The distribution of TIL subtypes in young women’s HR+ BC varied according to race, age and grade. High stromal and intratumoral expression of Th and Tregs was associated with improved BC outcomes. Characterization of immune cell subsets could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in HR+ BC, particularly in young pts who may benefit from individualized escalated/de-escalated tx strategies.

Abstract Purpose: Young women’s breast cancers (YBCs), defined herein as breast cancer (BC) diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years, are etiologically and biologically distinct from postmenopausal BCs, demonstrating a higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER) negative subtypes and a worse prognosis. Studies have not assessed whether risk factors such as recent parity and body mass index (BMI) are linked to protein expression profiles in YBCs. Accordingly, we examined protein expression assessed with GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) in 640 YBCs prepared as tissue microarrays (TMAs) in the Young Women’s BC Study (YWBCS). Methods: The YWBCS is a multi-institutional cohort of 1,297 women with incident BC diagnosed at age &lt;40 years identified through medical record review, with risk factor data collected via questionnaires. TMAs including 1,505 cores of 640 YBCs that were collected prior to therapy and were suitable for molecular analysis were evaluated for 72 markers with NanoString GeoMx DSP. Associations of log-transformed biomarker expression with BMI and time from last live birth to BC diagnosis were carried out using linear mixed modeling approaches, accounting for multiple tumor tissue cores per individual. Results: Mean age at BC was 35.5 years (range 17-40). Tumor subtypes based on clinical immunostaining were the following: luminal B 46%; luminal A 36%; triple negative 12% and HER2+ 6%. Of 72 biomarkers tested, 53 (74%) were evaluable after QC and normalization. GeoMx ER and PR protein levels were higher in luminal A and luminal B YBCs than in HER2+ and TNBC (p=2x10-94 and 2x10-52, respectively), supporting the accuracy of the GeoMx assay. Compared to nulliparas or those with most recent birth &gt; 3 years before BC, those who gave birth ≤ 3 years prior to BC had tumors with higher expression of PR (8x10-6) and ER (p=0.006), and lower expression of BCL-2 (p=0.006). In contrast, women with last birth ≥ 6 years prior to BC had higher expression of CD8 (p=0.006) and PD-1 (p=0.001) than nulliparas and those with more recent births. Compared to women with BMI between 18.5 and 29.9, those with higher or lower BMIs had higher expression of CD34 (p=0.0003), CD4 (p=0.0009) and CD14 (p=0.001). BCL-2 expression was higher among women with BMI &lt; 18.5 compared to those with higher values (p=0.005). Women with BMI of 30+ had higher β2-microglobulin levels than those with lower BMIs (p=0.003). Inverse dose-response associations (with higher BMI related to lower levels) were observed for expression of ER (p=0.01), pan cytokeratin (p=0.004) and four proteins in the p13K/AKT signaling pathway (p ≤ 0.01 for each). Conclusions: Preliminarily, we identify differences in hormonal and immune markers in YBCs in relation to timing of births and BMI, suggesting that these factors may contribute to etiologic heterogeneity. Multivariate modeling is ongoing to incorporate molecular subtype and other risk factors. Citation Format: Robert A. Vierkant, Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Stacey J. Winham, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Ji Shi, Craig Snow, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Chen Wang, Derek C. Radisky, Amy C. Degnim, E. Aubrey Thompson, Laura C. Collins, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Ann H. Partridge, Mark E. Sherman. Associations of parity and body mass index with NanoString digital spatial protein profiling in early onset breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1000.

Abstract Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an emerging biomarker for personalized risk-directed interventions, is increased in cancer survivors. However, little is known about patient preferences for CHIP testing. We surveyed participants in a prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The emailed survey included an introduction to CHIP and a vignette eliciting participants’ preferences for CHIP testing, considering sequentially: population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematologic malignancy, and heart disease; increased CHIP-associated risks; current CHIP management; dedicated CHIP clinic; and hypothetical CHIP treatment. Preference changes were evaluated using the McNemar test. The survey response rate was 82.2% (528/642). Median age at time of survey was 46 years and median time from diagnosis was 108 months. Only 5.9% had prior knowledge of CHIP. After vignette presentation, most survivors (87.1%) recommended CHIP testing for the vignette patient. Presented next with CHIP-independent, population-based risks, 11.1% shifted their preference from testing to not testing. After receiving information about CHIP-associated risks, an additional 10.1% shifted their preference to testing. Preference for testing increased if vignette patient was offered a CHIP clinic or hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching preferences toward testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% of participants desired CHIP testing for themselves. Among participants, 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP caused at least moderate anxiety. Most young survivors favored CHIP testing, with preferences influenced by risk presentation and potential management strategies. Our findings highlight the importance of risk communication and psychosocial support when considering biomarkers for future risk in cancer survivors. This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01468246.

10607 Background: Young women with breast cancer who carry germline genetic pathogenic variants predisposing to breast and other cancers, including BRCA1 or BRCA2, may face unique challenges when making fertility decisions. Limited data exist on differences in fertility preferences, concerns, and preservation strategies between carriers and non-carriers. Methods: Participants in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 40 yrs, who completed a baseline survey with a modified Fertility Issues Survey were included in this analysis. Genetic variant status was determined by medical record review complemented by survey self-report. We excluded carriers whose test date was after baseline survey completion or unknown. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively, between carriers and non-carriers. Results: Of 1052 eligible women, 118 (11%) tested positive for a pathogenic variant (59% BRCA1, 32% BRCA2, 4% TP53, and 5% other unique pathogenic mutations) and 934 (89%) tested negative or were not tested. Carriers’ median age was 36 yrs (range 23-40) vs 37 (range 17-40, p = 0.01) in non-carriers. Similar proportions (p = 0.67) of carriers (38%, [45/118]) and non-carriers (37%, [343/934]) desired more biologic children before diagnosis. Desire declined after diagnosis similarly in both groups (carriers, 25% [29/118] vs non-carriers, 26% [242/934], p = 0.46). Among these women (n = 271), concern about passing on cancer risk to offspring was common and, although numerically higher among carriers, this difference was not statistically significant (carriers, 55% [16/29] vs non-carriers, 40% [96/242], p = 0.12). In contrast, among those not interested in or unsure about future fertility (n = 738), concern about cancer risk heritability was infrequently reported as affecting fertility decisions (carriers, 11% [9/83] vs non-carriers, 9% [56/655], p = 0.54). The same proportions (p = 0.89) of carriers (36% [43/118]) and non-carriers (36% [339/934]) were somewhat or very concerned about becoming infertile after cancer treatment, and fertility preservation strategy utilization was similar between groups (carriers, 11% [13/118] vs non-carriers, 12% [111/934], p = 0.21). Conclusions: Young women with breast cancer who carry germline pathogenic variants are similarly concerned about future fertility and as likely to pursue fertility preservation as non-carriers. Concern about cancer risk heritability was common among both carriers and non-carriers desiring future fertility, suggesting a gap between perceived and actual risk. Genetic counseling should be included in fertility discussions for all young women with breast cancer, with tailored, risk-mitigating recommendations for those who carry genetic variants.

524 Background: OFS is an important treatment component for premenopausal women with early and advanced HR+ BC and optimal efficacy may depend on complete E2 suppression with GnRHa, especially when combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, standard assays lack sensitivity and accuracy at very low E2 concentrations, rendering detection of breakthrough ovarian function challenging. More informative data regarding endocrine effects of GnRHa are needed, particularly in young women who derive the most benefit from OFS yet more frequently had breakthrough E2 levels in the SOFT trial substudy, SOFT-EST. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years, we identified participants with stage I-IV HR+ BC on OFS treatment with leuprolide, goserelin or triptorelin and blood collected 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical data were obtained through surveys and medical records. Plasma estrogens were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with a limit of detection of 0.2 pg/mL compared to 10 pg/mL with standard assays. We assessed the proportion of women on OFS with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL (10 pmol/L) and > 10 pg/mL. Patient characteristics, estrone (E1) and FSH levels, and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with and without elevated E2 using Fischer’s exact, Wilcoxon rank sum and log rank tests, respectively. Results: Of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria, 72 (86%) had stage I-III and 12 (14%) had stage IV BC; 25 were on OFS plus AI and 59 were on OFS plus tamoxifen (TAM). Median E2 was 3.1 pg/mL (range 0.2-30.9). 46 patients (55%) had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL, including 8 on AI and 38 on TAM; 4 (5%) had E2 > 10 pg/mL, including 1 on AI and 3 on TAM. Factors associated with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL were no prior chemotherapy, TAM and high E1 ( P ≤.05), but not age, BMI or GnRHa schedule (Table). After a median follow-up of 7 years, DFS events were seen in 6 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.232); OS events were seen in 7 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.608). Conclusions: More than half of young women with ER+ BC had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL on OFS, 91% of whom would not have been detected by standard assays. This may be an area amenable to intervention to improve outcomes in young women. However, larger studies are needed to elucidate the optimal E2 target on OFS and clinical implications of incomplete E2 suppression on ultrasensitive assays. [Table: see text]

e24108 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased risk of hematologic malignancies and heart disease. Limited data suggest an increased prevalence of CHIP in patients treated for solid tumors, particularly after exposure to radiation and chemotherapy. CHIP testing may inform risk-reduction strategies for cancer survivors. Little is known about patient knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding CHIP testing. Methods: We surveyed survivors without history of recurrence participating in an ongoing prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The survey was sent by email and included an introduction to CHIP including risk factors and clinical associations. Respondents then reviewed a vignette and were asked about CHIP testing preferences (definitely/probably test vs. definitely/probably not test) considering sequentially: 1) population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematological malignancy and heart disease; 2) estimated increase in these risks with CHIP; 3) current CHIP management; 4) a dedicated CHIP clinic; and 5) a theoretical CHIP treatment. Changes in preferences from the prior scenario were evaluated with the McNemar's test using a type I error rate of 5%. Results: 528/642 (82.2%) eligible women responded to the survey, at a median age of 46 (range: 31-54) years (median time from diagnosis: 108 months (range: 60-168)), and 88% were white. Most had stage 1/2 BC (78.8%) and had received chemotherapy (73.1%) and/or radiation (61.9%). 93.6% had never heard of CHIP prior to survey. After initial patient vignette presentation, most women (87.1%,) recommended CHIP testing if offered. Preferences for testing decreased (p<0.05) when considering population-based risks, with 11.1% shifting their preference from CHIP testing to not testing. After considering increased risks associated with CHIP, interest in testing increased (p<0.05), with 10.1% shifting their preference to testing. Interest significantly (p<0.05) increased with the possibility of managing CHIP through a clinic or a hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching their preferences towards testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% responded that they themselves, after learning about CHIP and reviewing the vignette, would want to have CHIP testing; 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP and the associated risks caused them at least moderate anxiety. Conclusion: Few young BC survivors were aware of CHIP yet most indicated an interest in testing after learning about it. Testing preferences were influenced by risks presented and potential management strategies. Findings highlight the importance of effective risk communication and the need for adequate psychosocial support when considering testing for CHIP and other potential clinical biomarkers predictive of cancer and other medical risks in cancer survivors.

514 Background: The 21- gene Breast Recurrence Score predicts benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER-2 negative (-) breast cancer (BC). We aimed to examine whether the 21-gene assay predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We identified patients with stage I-III ER+/HER2− BC treated with NAC from the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 40 years. The 21-gene assay was performed on tumor specimens removed prior to NAC either as part of clinical care or retrospectively for research. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive tumor (ypT0/is ypN0). The relationship between Recurrence Score result (RS) and pCR was evaluated using logistic regression modeling. Results: 76 women in the cohort had undergone NAC for ER+, HER2- BC and were eligible for this analysis: 5 had undergone clinical 21-gene assay testing, 71 had banked specimens retrospectively tested. Median age at diagnosis was 36.7 (24.3-40). Most tumors were of ductal histology (78%), high grade (51%), progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (86%), ≥T2 (88%), clinically node positive (74%), and anthracycline and taxane containing protocols were administered in 86% of cases. RS ranged between 5-75 with 50% > 25 and only 4 < 11. Mean RS was significantly higher among tumors achieving pCR vs. non-pCR response (51.9 vs. 26.6, pwilcoxon= 0.0005). pCR rate in patients with RS > 25 was 21% (8/38) vs. 5% in patients with RS < 25 (2/38), with both pCRs in the <25 group in patients with RS 21-25. In univariable analysis, PgR negativity (odds ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-24.89, p = 0.02), high grade (OR 9.03, 95%CI 1.07-76.32, p = 0.04) and higher RS as a continuous variable (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13, p = 0.0003) were associated with a greater likelihood of pCR. In multivariable analysis only RS remained significantly associated with pCR (OR: 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.01): a 7% increase in the odds of pCR for every 1-point increase in RS. Conclusions: In young women with ER+, HER2- BC who received NAC, higher pretreatment RS was associated with an increased likelihood of pCR. Genomic expression profiling assays may have a role in decision-making in young women in need of neoadjuvant therapy. For women with low likelihood of benefiting from NAC, alternative approaches are clearly warranted. Given the demonstrated efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in post-menopausal women, further evaluation in young women should be pursued.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer arising in young women is more likely to have higher risk features than in older women and more likely to be associated with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We previously reported a higher distribution of luminal B-like tumors among young women. Here we present the clinical and pathologic features of invasive disease in a large prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer, and associations between surrogate molecular subtype and BRCA 1/2 mutation status. Methods: Among 1,297 young women (aged ≤40 years) with breast cancer enrolled from 2006-2016, tumor histopathological features were examined by central review, and biomarker status was extracted from pathology reports. Based on histologic grade and biomarker expression, invasive tumors were categorized as luminal A-like (LA=ER/PR+ and HER2-, histologic grade 1 or 2), luminal B-like (LB=ER/PR+ and HER2+, or ER/PR+, HER2-, and grade 3), HER2 enriched (E) (ER/PR- and HER2+) or triple negative (TN=ER-, PR- and HER2-). Tumor stage, clinical characteristics, and BRCA status were retrieved by medical record review (and patient survey for BRCA status if not in medical record). Results: The majority of women presented with early stage invasive disease (8% stage 0, 32% stage 1, 40% stage 2, 15% stage 3; 5% stage 4). Among invasive tumors with evaluable molecular phenotype (n=1,136), 57% were high grade and the distribution of subtypes was: 33% LA, 42% LB, 8% HER2E, and 16% TN (Table 1). Among different age groups (≤ 30, 31-35, and 36-40 years), there were no significant differences in molecular phenotype, tumor stage, tumor grade or histopathological features including presence of tumor necrosis, lymphocytic infiltration, and central fibrotic focus. 96% of women were tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations, and 127 (11%) tested positive: 65% were BRCA1+, and 35% were BRCA2+ (table 2). Among BRCA1+ patients, 2% of cancers were LA, 30% LB, 5% HER2E, and 62% TN; among BRCA2+, 29% were LA, 56% LB, 2% HER2E, and 13% TN. These proportions were relatively consistent across age groups. BRCA1+ patients’ tumors were proportionately more TN and BRCA2+ patients’ tumors more likely to be LB/HER2 negative (p&lt;0.0001), irrespective of age category. Conclusion: In a large cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40, there was no association between age group (≤ 30, 31-35, vs. 36-40 years) and tumor stage, grade, or tumor molecular phenotype among women with invasive disease. As in older women, tumor molecular phenotype does vary by BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation status, which has implications for prevention and treatment. Table 1. Subtype by age groupTotal (n=1136)≤30 yrs (n=144)31-35 yrs (n=314)36-40 yrs (n=678)p=0.42Luminal A-like377 (33%)48 (33%)99 (32%)230 (34%)Luminal B-like477 (42%)59 (41%)137 (44%)281 (41%)• ER/PR+, HER2-, grade 3245 (22%)27 (19%)68 (22%)150 (22%)• ER/PR+, HER2+232 (20%)32 (22%)69 (22%)131 (19%)HER2E95 (8%)13 (9%)34 (11%)48 (7%)Triple Negative187 (16%)24 (17%)44 (14%)119 (18%) Table 2. Subtype by BRCA statusTotal(n=1136)BRCA1+(n=82)BRCA2+(n=45)No mutation/not tested(n=1009)p&lt;0.0001Luminal A-like377 (33%)2 (2%)13 (29%)362 (36%)Luminal B-like477 (42%)25 (30%)25 (56%)427 (42%)• ER/PR+, HER2-, grade 3245 (22%)21 (26%)18 (40%)206 (20%)• ER/PR+, HER2+232 (20%)4 (5%)7 (16%)221 (22%)HER2E95 (8%)4 (5%)1 (2%)90 (9%)Triple Negative187 (16%)51 (62%)6 (13%)130 (13%) Citation Format: Yaileen D Guzman-Arocho, Shoshana M. Rosenberg, Philip Poorvu, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Greg Kirkner, Craig Snow, Rulla M. Tamimi, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virginia F. Borges, Steven E. Come, Elena F. Brachtel, Ellen Warner, Ann H. Partridge, Laura C. Collins. Clinicopathological features and BRCA 1/2 status in a large prospective cohort of young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-02.

554 Background: HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is particularly common in young women. Genomic features of HER2+ tumors before and after H-based therapy have not been described in a population of young women and may point to clinically targetable mechanisms of resistance. Methods: From a large prospective cohort of women diagnosed with BC age ≤40 years, we identified those with HER2+ BC and tumor tissue available for sequencing before and after chemo+H. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on each tumor and on germline DNA from blood. Tumor-normal pairs were analyzed for mutations and copy number (CN) changes. Evolutionary analysis was performed for patients with both pre- and post-treatment (tx) samples. Results: 22 women had successful WES samples from at least one timepoint; 13 of these had paired sequencing results both before and after chemo+H. For the majority of women, post-tx sample was following neoadjuvant chemo + H, though post-tx timepoint for other women represented locoregional or distant metastasis (Table). TP53 was the only gene that was significantly recurrently mutated in both pre- and post-tx samples. Comparison of matched pre-tx and post-tx samples demonstrated that large changes in HER2 CN over the course of tx were uncommon, only 2/13 pts had > 2-fold change in HER2 CN. Other clonal and subclonal genomic alterations were found to be acquired in the post-tx sample compared to the pre-tx sample. One patient acquired a putative activating mutation in ERBB2. Another patient acquired a clonal hotpsot mutation in TP53. MYC gene amplification was observed in 4 post-tx tumors. NOTCH2 alterations were found in post-tx biopsies from 2 different patients, and mutations in STIL were also found in post-tx biopsies from 2 patients, though the function of these mutations is not known. Conclusions: HER2+ breast tumors in young women display genomic evolution following tx with chemo+H. HER2 CN changes are uncommon, but we identified several genes that warrant exploration as potential mechanisms of resistance to therapy in this population.[Table: see text]