Schapira, Lidia

Abstract Background Whether outcomes of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-associated breast cancer differ compared with sporadic tumors is controversial. We explored the impact of gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) status beyond established prognostic features. Methods We conducted 2 retrospective, matched cohort studies comparing gBRCA1/2 PV carriers and noncarriers with HER2-negative, stage I-III breast cancer (Clinical Outcomes Quality Database [COQD] cohort: 185 carriers, 555 noncarriers; Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study [YWS] cohort: 113 carriers, 226 noncarriers). Matching factors were age, stage, hormone receptor status, and year of diagnosis. Clinicopathological features, treatments, and survival outcomes were compared between carriers and noncarriers. Results Most patients in COQD had stage I-II disease (87.2%), and more carriers than noncarriers had genetic testing before diagnosis (33% vs 5.6%, P < .001). In YWS, 22.7% of patients had stage III tumors, and few were tested before diagnosis (14.8% of carriers vs 1.7% of noncarriers; P < .001). Carriers in COQD received chemotherapy more often than noncarriers (81.1 vs 67.0%, P < .001), including platinum (P = .010); the proportion was similar for carriers and noncarriers in YWS. After adjusting for chemotherapy, relapse-free survival was longer in carriers than noncarriers in COQD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.48 [95% CI = 0.26 to 0.87], P = .016), and a favorable trend was observed for other survival outcomes in both cohorts. Triple-negative tumors appeared to drive the differences. Conclusions We observed a trend toward improved outcomes in gBRCA1/2 PV carriers compared with noncarriers. These findings suggest that carriers should not receive more aggressive treatment solely based on their germline mutation status. Prospective clinical trials in this population are warranted.

Abstract Background: Young women with DCIS are at increased risk of recurrence and second BC compared to older women and may derive the greatest benefit from risk reduction strategies. Little is known about treatment decision-making, engagement in preventive behaviors, or fear of recurrence among young DCIS survivors. Thus, we sought to investigate treatment and prevention issues in this population. Methods: Using a multicenter prospective cohort that enrolled 1302 women with stage 0-IV BC at age ≤40, we identified participants with DCIS only who completed surveys in the year following diagnosis (dx). Surveys assessed treatment decisions, lifestyle factors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity [PA]), and fear of recurrence (Lasry Scale). Data was summarized with descriptive statistics and groups were compared with Fisher’s exact test. Results: Among 87 patients (median age 38, range 26-40), 75 had available treatment decision data, 19 (25%) of whom had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 11 (15%) unilateral mastectomy (UM), and 45 (60%) bilateral mastectomy (BM). Most (77%) indicated their doctor said BCS was an option or recommended, including 34 (59%) who had BM. Of 40 patients who reported a patient-driven surgical decision, 73% had BM, 13% UM, and 15% BCS. Among 15 patients who reported the decision as doctor-driven, none had BM, 27% UM, and 73% BCS. Those who had BM were more likely to be extremely confident about the decision (80% vs. 73% UM vs. 53% BCS, p=0.022). Adjuvant tamoxifen was used by 10/27 (37%) patients with ER+ DCIS who had BCS/UM. Most who took tamoxifen reported this decision was shared with their doctor (90%); 1 reported the decision was made on her own. Of the 17 patients who did not take tamoxifen, 88% indicated their doctor said endocrine therapy was an option or recommended. Among all 87 patients, 31 (36%) were former and 3 (4%) were current smokers at baseline assessment (median 5 months post-dx); 51 (59%) never smoked. Overall, 4 quit within 1 year of dx. Most patients (83%) were current drinkers at baseline, though 79% consumed <5 alcoholic beverages/week; 8% reported lower consumption at 1 year. Regarding PA at 1 year, 73% (58/80) reported ≥150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA/week. Overall, 41% of young survivors were at least moderately concerned about their BC coming back, with concern varying numerically by surgery (65% post-BCS, 50% post-UM, 29% post-BM, p=0.053). Conclusions: BC recurrence concerns were frequent among young DCIS patients, particularly among those with remaining breast tissue. BM decisions were largely patient-driven and made with high confidence, reflecting preferences towards surgical prevention. While adherence to survivorship lifestyle guidelines was high, including not smoking, consumption of ≤7 drinks/week, and engaging in PA, tamoxifen use was low, even when offered by a provider. Young DCIS survivors appear motivated to lower future BC risk through surgery and maintenance of healthy behaviors, and less so with tamoxifen; such values should be considered during treatment and survivorship counseling. Citation Format: Megan E. Tesch, Julia S. Wong, Laura Dominici, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Rulla Tamini, Lidia Schapira, Virginia F. Borges, Ellen Warner, Steven E. Come, Karen Sepucha, Laura C. Collins, Ann H. Partridge, Shoshana M. Rosenberg. Breast cancer (BC) risk reduction in young women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Rethinking DCIS: An Opportunity for Prevention?; 2022 Sep 8-11; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2022;15(12 Suppl_1): Abstract nr PR009.

Abstract Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is prevalent among breast cancer survivors and more intense in younger women. Given that FCR is a powerful determinant of quality of life and is associated with healthcare utilization, identifying who may be at risk for experiencing elevated FCR without resolution can inform the timing and targeting of interventions. Methods: Participants included women diagnosed (dx’d) at age ≤40 enrolled in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study, a multi-site prospective cohort surveyed at baseline and regularly in follow-up. Surveys include the 3-item Lasry Fear of Recurrence Index which measures the degree of concern about recurrence and current health using 4-point Likert response options that provide a score ranging from 3-12; higher scores indicate greater concern. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify distinct FCR patterns from baseline (median of 5 months from dx) through 3 years post-dx. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the associated patient (socio-demographics and BRCA status), disease (stage, ER/PR/HER2) and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy) characteristics associated with each trajectory. Variables significant at p<0.05 in univariable models were entered into the final multivariable model. Results: 965 women with Stages 0-III breast cancer were included in the analysis, with a median age at dx of 37. Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic White (85%), partnered (76%) and had completed college (84%). There was a significant decrease in median FCR scores from baseline to year 3 (9 vs. 8, Wilcoxon signed-rank test P<0.01). Five FCR trajectories (Table) were identified: 1) 10.5% of participants reported low/stable FCR from baseline over follow-up; 2) 33.1% had moderate FCR that improved over time; 3) 5.5% had moderate FCR scores at baseline that worsened over time; 4) 30% had high FCR scores at baseline that improved over time; 5) 20.8% had high FCR at baseline that remained high at all time points. In the fully adjusted multinomial model, younger age at dx and Stage 3 and 2 (vs. 1) disease were associated with higher odds of being in the high/stable trajectory. Having a lumpectomy (vs. mastectomy) was associated with higher odds of being in a high/stable as well as moderate/improving trajectory while White (vs. non-White) women had higher odds of being in a trajectory of improving FCR. Receipt of chemotherapy and financial discomfort were significantly associated with assignment to specific FCR trajectories in univariate analyses, however did not remain significant in the adjusted model. Being partnered, BRCA mutation status, and ER/PR/HER2 status were not significantly associated with any FCR trajectory classification in univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusion: While FCR improves over time for many young women with breast cancer, a substantial minority (26%) had FCR that was severe and did not improve or worsened over time. Younger women with higher stage disease who are at risk for high levels of unresolved FCR may benefit from intervention including early referral to mental health professionals. Ongoing monitoring of women at risk for developing FCR following active treatment is warranted. Table Mean FCR score for each trajectoryBaselineYear 1Year 2Year 3TrajectoriesLow/Stable (N=103)5.725.605.545.45Moderate/Improving (N=331)7.907.487.287.09Moderate/Worsening (N=34)6.748.329.6410.54High/Improving (N=294)9.889.419.088.67High/Stable (N=203)11.0211.0811.0310.88 Citation Format: Lidia Schapira, Yue Zheng, Shari Gelber, Philip Poorvu, Kathryn J Ruddy, Rulla Tamini, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Steve Come, Virginia Borges, Ann Partridge, Shoshana Rosenberg. Trajectories of fear of cancer recurrence in young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-09.

Abstract Background: Synchronous bilateral breast cancer is rare, with reported incidence from 0.3-12%; the incidence and pattern of bilateral breast cancer among younger women is unknown. Here we report the incidence and phenotypes of bilateral breast cancer in women ≤40 years of age enrolled in the Young Women's Study (YWS) cohort. Methods: The YWS is a multi-center, prospective cohort study that enrolled women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at age ≤40 years from 2006-2016. Those with synchronous bilateral breast cancer (in-situ and/or invasive) formed our study cohort. Disease characteristics and treatment were obtained by medical record review. Central pathology review was performed to capture histologic features and categorize the tumor phenotype as either luminal A (hormone receptor (HR)+, HER2-, grade 1 or 2), luminal B (HR+, HER2+, or HER2- and grade 3), HER2-type (HR-, HER2+), or triple negative (TNC; HR/HER2-). Tumor phenotypes of bilateral breast cancers were compared and evaluated for concordance. Results: Among 1302 patients enrolled in the YWS, 20 (1.5%) patients presented with bilateral disease, with median age of diagnosis of 38 years (range 18-40). The majority of patients (13 (65%)) presented with unilateral symptoms and contralateral disease was identified on subsequent imaging. 12 (60%) reported a positive family history of breast cancer and 17 (85%) underwent genetic testing; resulting in the identification of 6 mutation carriers (2 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 TP53). The majority of patients (15 (75%)) underwent bilateral mastectomy, 1 underwent unilateral mastectomy with contralateral lumpectomy, and 4 underwent bilateral lumpectomy. On pathology, 2 patients had bilateral in-situ disease, 5 had unilateral invasive and contralateral in-situ disease, and 13 had bilateral invasive disease. Of those with bilateral invasive disease, all had concordant tumor histology (92% ductal, 8% ductal and lobular), 10 (77%) patients had bilateral luminal tumors and when fully characterized 6 were of the same luminal type. Only one patient had bilateral basal-like breast cancer. Patient ID ERPRHer2 amplifiedGradePhenotype1Left++-2Luminal A Right++-3Luminal B3Left++-3Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B6Left++-3Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B9Left++-2Luminal A Right++-2Luminal A10Left+++3Luminal B Right++-2Luminal A12Left+--3Luminal B Right+--2Luminal A13Left---NABasal-like Right++-NALuminal A or B14Left+++2Luminal B Right++-3Luminal B15Left++-3Luminal B Right+++3Luminal B16Left+++3Luminal B Right--+NAHEr2-type17Left---3Basal-like Right---3Basal-like19Left++-2Luminal A Right++-3Luminal B20Left++-1Luminal A Right++-2Luminal A Conclusions: Among a large cohort of young women, only 20 (1.5%) had bilateral disease, and the majority of the invasive tumors were of the luminal phenotype, yet frequently differed by grade or HER2 status; supporting the need for thorough pathologic evaluation of bilateral disease to determine risk and tailor treatment. Overall the low incidence of bilateral disease and preponderance of the luminal phenotype in this population is reassuring. Citation Format: Pak LM, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Snow C, Collins L, King TA, Partridge AH. Tumor phenotype and concordance in synchronous bilateral breast cancer in young women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-22-03.