Ingle, J.

549 Background: MA.17 evaluated letrozole (LET) or placebo (PLAC) after 5 years of tamoxifen (Tam) and showed [median follow-up 30 months (mos)] significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for LET [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, p = 0.00008]. The trial was unblinded and PLAC patients (pts) were offered LET. An ITT analysis of all outcomes, before and after unblinding, based on the original randomization was performed. Methods: A stratified log-rank test was used to compare DFS, distant (D)DFS, overall survival (OS) and incidence of contra-lateral breast cancer (CBC). The Cox regression model used baseline stratification variables and two prespecified factors, menopausal status at the start of Tam and time on Tam. Subgroup analyses for DFS and OS were performed for the two prespecified subsets. All p-values were two-sided Results: 5187 pts were randomized at baseline and, at unblinding, 1655 of 2268 PLAC pts accepted LET. At median follow-up of 54 mos (range,16–86) 363 recurrences or CBC’s (144 LET and 219 PLAC) occurred; 118 LET and 176 PLAC pts had recurrent disease and 26 LET and 43 PLAC pts had CBC. 4 year DFS was 94.3% (LET) and 91.4% (PLAC) (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 - 0.79; p = 0.00002). Corresponding 4 year DDFS was 96.2% and 94.9% (HR 0.76; 0.58–0.99; p = 0.041). 4 year OS was 95.0% (LET) and 95.1% (PLAC) (HR 1.00; 0.78–1.28; p = 0.99). LET was equally effective in node +ve and -ve pts (i.e., similar HRs) in DFS. OS was not significantly different for LET and PLAC in any subgroup. The annual rate of CBC was 0.29% LET (0.18–0.40) and 0.47% PLAC (0.34–0.61); HR 0.61 (0.38–0.98) p = 0.037. 255 pts had died as of the data cut-off (128 LET and 127 PLAC). Conclusions: In this ITT analysis, pts originally randomized to LET within 3 months of stopping Tam did better than PLAC pts in DFS, DDFS and CBC, despite 73% of PLAC pts crossing to LET after unblinding. This highlights the strong beneficial effect of extended adjuvant therapy with LET. [Table: see text]

510 Background: CALGB 9344 showed 4 cycles of paclitaxel (T) after 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) improved disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to 4 cycles of AC. Higher dose of A had no benefit (Henderson JCO ’03). Prior studies suggest HER2 is associated with benefit from standard vs low dose of C&A (Dressler JCO ’05). We hypothesized that HER2 might predict benefit from higher dose of A or from T, and that HER2 might refine the observed negative interaction of T with estrogen receptor (ER). Methods: 3121 node + women in CALGB 9344 received 4 q3wk cycles of AC (A: 60, 75, or 90 mg/m2) and then 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2 q3wk) or no T. Blocks were collected from ∼2800 subjects. 2 sets of 750 patients each were randomly selected from these cases: Set 1 to develop hypotheses; Set 2 for validation. Tissue specimens were available from 643 (set1) and 679 (set2) cases (20% & 22% total enrolled in 9344 respectively). HER2 was evaluated by FISH and by IHC (by antibody cb11 and by Herceptest). Statistical analyses used Cox proportional hazards models, including interaction terms, and Kaplan-Meier estimates for comparing 5-yr DFS by treatment group. Results: In Set 1, all 3 assays suggested that T improved DFS for HER2+ but not for HER2-. For this single set the interaction was not statistically significant. There appeared to be an interaction of HER2, T and ER. IHC using cb11 was applied to Set 2, revealing nearly identical results. In the two sets combined (n=1322), the interaction between HER2 and T was statistically significant (p=0.013). The 3-way interaction of HER2, ER and T was hypothesis-generating and not tested statistically. Differences in 5-yr DFS rates (95% CI) for T vs. no T by HER2 and ER (both sets combined) There was no interaction between HER2 and dose of A. Conclusions: These results suggest that the benefit of adding T to AC is greater for HER2+ tumors, even if ER+, while T was of no apparent benefit in the ER+, HER2- group. Further validation is needed from remaining cases in 9344 and from other trials involving T. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) affects approximately 15-20% of BC patients, yet accounts for a disproportionately higher rate of BC morbidity and mortality, in part due to lack of targeted therapies. Using well-validated antibodies, Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ) protein has been shown to be expressed in approximately 25% of TNBCs and is associated with improved patient outcomes. Using multiple ERβ +/- TNBC cell lines and PDX models, we have demonstrated that ligand-mediated activation of ERβ by estradiol (E2) decreases cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in vitro, as well as primary tumor growth and metastatic spread in vivo. Methods: To determine the mechanisms by which ERβ elicits these anti-cancer effects, we elucidated the ERβ transcriptome and cistrome via Microarray and ChIPseq, respectively, in TNBC cells stably expressing ERβ in a doxycycline-inducible manner. We also performed gene expression and luciferase assays to assess the impact of ERβ on NFκB signaling, followed by ChIP-PCR and ChIPseq to assess how ERβ modifies chromatin architecture near NFκB target genes. Results: Pathway analysis of ERβ-regulated genes identified NFκB signaling as one of the most suppressed pathways in response to E2 treatment. Indeed, numerous NFκB target genes were among the most down-regulated genes following E2 treatment but only in the presence of ERβ expression. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIPseq) revealed that ERβ primarily associated with estrogen response elements (EREs), but was also enriched around NFκB binding sites following E2 treatment. In fact, 12% of all ERβ binding sites were enriched for NFκB response elements and ERβ was shown to physically associate with NFκB protein. Using an NFκB reporter construct and qPCR, ERβ was shown to block TNFα-mediated induction of NFκB signaling and NFκB target gene expression. Globally, RNAseq identified 200 genes to be significantly regulated by TNFα in TNBC cells, of which 81 were significantly altered in the presence of E2+TNFα. ChIPseq demonstrated that ligand-mediated activation of ERβ significantly diminished an activating histone mark (H3K27Ac) at many of these NFκB target genes while enhancing a repressive mark (H3K27Me3). These modifications are also associated with recruitment of the histone methyltransferase, EZH2, to enhancer elements of these NFκB target genes. Drug-mediated blockade of HDAC and EZH2 activity reversed suppression of NFκB target gene expression by ERβ. Conclusions: Our data suggest that ERβ may elicit its anti-cancer effects in part via formation of a novel co-repressor complex consisting of ERβ, NFκB, and EZH2. These data are in keeping with prior observations of the importance of NFκB signaling as it relates to TNBC cell proliferation and invasion, and that decreased expression of NFκB target genes is associated with improved outcomes in TNBC patients. Currently, a Mayo Breast SPORE prospective study is underway to investigate the role of estradiol in ERβ expressing TNBC and to further evaluate the cross-talk between ERβ and NFκB signaling in TNBC. Citation Format: Aspros K, Nelson A, Ye Z, Sun Z, Chernukhin I, Carroll J, Ingle J, Goetz M, Hawse J. Estrogen receptor beta elicits anti-cancer effects in triple negative breast cancer through suppression of NFκB signaling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-03.