Back to Authors

Harrison, Andrew R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-2772

Mayo Clinic

University of Minnesota

Citations 4

Intersurgeon Variability in Proptosis Reduction After Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Multicenter Analysis
Hong, Ashley, Shoji, Marissa K. , Villatoro, George A., Radha-Saseendrakumar, Bharanidharan, Dolman, Peter J. , Kazim, Michael, Harrison, Andrew R. , Lucarelli, Mark J., Garrity, James A., Selva, Dinesh , Ediriwickrema, Lilangi S. , Liu, Catherine Y., Korn, Bobby S. , Kikkawa, Don O. , Baxter, Sally L.

Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | October 14, 2025 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 318-324

10.1097/iop.0000000000003090 Get It

Purpose: This study assesses intersurgeon variability in proptosis reduction after orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with thyroid eye disease who underwent orbital decompression from 1 of 7 surgeons at 7 different institutions between January 2002 and December 2018. Data were included if a single decompression technique was performed on ≥10 patients by ≥2 surgeons. The primary outcome was postoperative change in proptosis with emphasis on comparison among surgeons utilizing similar surgical techniques. Statistical analysis was performed with χ 2 and ANOVA testing, and a multivariable logistic regression model was generated. Results: Six hundred thirty-three orbits that underwent orbital decompression were included. Five different decompression techniques were analyzed: medial wall (n = 29), fat + lateral wall (n = 113), medial wall + floor (n = 123), fat + lateral wall + medial wall (n = 140), and fat + lateral wall + medial wall + floor (n = 228), without significant difference in proptosis reduction among surgeons. Surgeons did not demonstrate significant differences in outcomes at different time points compared with each other or themselves. Outcomes when comparing endoscopic versus open medial wall decompression varied among surgery types. Multivariate modeling revealed a statistically significant association between postoperative change in proptosis with preoperative proptosis ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative change in proptosis did not differ significantly between surgeons utilizing similar orbital decompression techniques for patients with thyroid eye disease. This study may strengthen the statistical validity of multicenter clinical trials assessing orbital decompression outcomes performed by surgeons employing uniform surgical techniques, thereby advancing our understanding of optimal surgical management strategies for thyroid eye disease.
Predictive Modeling of New-Onset Postoperative Diplopia Following Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease
Nair, Archana , Ediriwickrema, Lilangi S. , Dolman, Peter J. , Law, Geoffrey , Harrison, Andrew R. , Mokhtarzadeh, Ali , Stewart, Krista J., Men, Clara J. , Lucarelli, Mark J., Landingham, Suzanne van, Wingelaar, Maxwell , Verma, Rohan , Chen, Allison , Selva, Dinesh , Garrity, James, Eckel, Laurence J. , Kazim, Michael, Godfrey, Kyle J. , Korn, Bobby S. , Kikkawa, Don O. , Eckel, Laurence, Stewart, Krista, Landingham, Suzanne W. van , Baxter, Sally L.

Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | May 13, 2022 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 551-557

10.1097/iop.0000000000002196 Get It

Purpose: To identify risk factors for the development of new-onset, postoperative diplopia following orbital decompression surgery based on patient demographics, clinical exam characteristics, radiographic parameters, and surgical techniques. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective chart review of patients who underwent orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease (TED). Patient demographics, including age, gender, smoking history, preoperative exophthalmometry, clinical activity score (CAS), use of peribulbar and/or systemic steroids, and type of orbital decompression were reviewed. Postoperative diplopia was determined at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively and before any further surgeries. Cross-sectional area ratios of each extraocular muscle to orbit and total fat to orbit were calculated from coronal imaging in a standard fashion. All measurements were carried out using PACS imaging software. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results: A total of 331 patients without preoperative diplopia were identified. At 3 months postoperatively, 249 patients had no diplopia whereas 82 patients developed diplopia. The average postoperative follow-up was 22 months (range 3–156) months. Significant preoperative clinical risk factors for postoperative diplopia included older age at surgery, proptosis, use of peribulbar or systemic steroids, elevated clinical activity score, and presence of preoperative compressive optic neuropathy. Imaging findings of enlarged cross-sectional areas of each rectus muscle to the overall orbital area also conferred a significant risk of postoperative diplopia. Regarding surgical factors, postoperative diplopia was more common among those undergoing medial wall decompression, bilateral orbital surgery, and balanced decompression, whereas endoscopic medial wall decompression was found to be relatively protective. Conclusions: This study identifies risk factors associated with the development of diplopia following orbital decompression using multivariable data. This study demonstrates that several characteristics including age, clinical activity score, the cross-sectional muscle to orbit ratios, in addition to the type of orbital decompression surgery, are predictive factors for the development of new-onset postoperative diplopia.
Ultrasonic Aspiration for Debulking Infiltrative Masses of the Orbit
Sun, Susan , Stewart, Krista J., Lyford-Pike, Sofía , Garrity, James A., Harrison, Andrew R. , Mokhtarzadeh, Ali , Stewart, Krista

Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | December 23, 2019 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 198-201

10.1097/iop.0000000000001537 Get It

Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of an ultrasonic aspirator (Sonopet, Stryker Corporation; Kalamazoo, MI) for debulking firm, soft tissue masses of the orbit. Methods: Case series. The ultrasonic aspirator was used to debulk firm, soft tissue masses in 3 cases. The initial patient had a large orbitofacial mass extending to the inferior and lateral orbital apex secondary to IgG4 disease. The second patient had a lacrimal sac adenocarcinoma extending to the medial orbital apex. The third patient had a large orbital mass extending to the apex secondary to granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Results: The ultrasonic aspirator facilitated debulking of infiltrative firm soft tissue masses of the orbit. The device’s ability to emulsify, irrigate, and aspirate, along with its small footprint, facilitated precise sculpting and debulking to an extent which would have been difficult otherwise due to location. Conclusions: The ultrasonic aspirator allows precise sculpting of infiltrative firm soft tissue masses in the orbit and is particularly useful in cases with challenging anatomical access.