Mould, Diane R.

Abstract PAC203 is a randomized dose-finding study of pacritinib, an oral JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced myelofibrosis who are intolerant of or resistant to ruxolitinib. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pacritinib 100 mg once per day, 100 mg twice per day, or 200 mg twice per day. Enhanced eligibility criteria, monitoring, and dose modifications were implemented to mitigate risk of cardiac and hemorrhagic events. Efficacy was based on ≥35% spleen volume response (SVR) and ≥50% reduction in the 7-component total symptom score (TSS) through week 24. Of 161 patients, 73% were intolerant of and 76% had become resistant to ruxolitinib; 50% met criteria for both. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 103/μL) was present in 44%. SVR rates were highest with 200 mg twice per day (100 mg once per day, 0%; 100 mg twice per day, 1.8%; 200 mg twice per day, 9.3%), particularly among patients with baseline platelet counts <50 × 103/μL (17%; 4 of 24). Although TSS response rate was similar across doses (100 mg once per day, 7.7%; 100 mg twice per day, 7.3%; 200 mg twice per day, 7.4%), median percent reduction in TSS suggested a dose-response relationship (–3%, −16%, and −27%, respectively). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling based on all available data showed greatest SVR and TSS reduction at 200 mg twice per day compared with lower doses. Common adverse events were gastrointestinal events, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. There was no excess of grade ≥3 hemorrhagic or cardiac events at 200 mg twice per day. Pacritinib 200 mg twice per day demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile and was selected as the recommended dose for a pivotal phase 3 study in patients with myelofibrosis and severe thrombocytopenia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03165734.

2557 Background: AT-101 is an oral, pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bcl-W, Mcl-1). Overexpression of Bcl-2 family proteins is common in human cancers. AT-101 activity as a single agent as well as in combination with docetaxel has been reported. The ongoing Phase 1 study of AT-101 as a single agent was expanded to include a cohort of patients to determine the PK of AT-101 in fed and fasted states. Methods: Twelve patients (pts) were enrolled and randomized into cohorts of six pts each. Cohort A received AT-101 (80 mg) orally on day 1 on an empty stomach (fasted) and again on day 8 with a high fat high calorie breakfast (fed), per FDA guidelines. Cohort B received AT-101 on day 1 fed and on day 8 fasted. Preliminary plasma concentration time data for AT-101 from 10 patients administered 80 mg orally were evaluated using noncompartmental analysis. Log transformed peak concentration (Cmax) and exposure (AUC) were compared the between fed and fasted groups with the fasted group as the reference treatment. Results: Preliminary PK results from the first 10 pts are shown in the Table. For AUC and Cmax, the effect of food resulted in an approximately 42% and 5% increase, respectively. However the confidence intervals were not wholly outside the 80–125% intervals. Conclusions: These data indicate that food may increase AT-101 exposure in terms of AUC and Cmax. Updated results from all 12 pts will be presented at the meeting. Based on our preliminary results, it is recommended that AT-101 be taken at least an hour (or more) before or after food. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Introduction The optimal trial design for assessing novel therapies in paediatric IBD (PIBD) is a subject of intense ongoing global discussions and debate among the different stakeholders. However, there is a consensus that the current situation in which most medications used in children with IBD are prescribed as off-label without sufficient paediatric data is unacceptable. Shortening the time lag between adult and paediatric approval of drugs is of the upmost importance. In this position paper we aimed to provide guidance from the global clinical research network (Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Network, PIBDnet) for designing clinical trials in PIBD in order to facilitate drug approval for children. Methods A writing group has been established by PIBDnet and topics were assigned to different members. After an iterative process of revisions among the writing group and one face-to-face meeting, all statements have reached consensus of >80% as defined a priori. Next, all core members of PIBDnet voted on the statements, reaching consensus of >80% on all statements. Comments from the members were incorporated in the text. Results The commentary includes 18 statements for guiding data extrapolation from adults, eligibility criteria to PIBD trials, use of placebo, dosing, endpoints and recommendations for feasible trials. Controversial issues have been highlighted in the text. Conclusion The viewpoints expressed in this paper could assist planning clinical trials in PIBD which are both of high quality and ethical, while remaining pragmatic.