Navacchia, Alessandro

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury reduction training has focused on lower body strengthening and landing stabilization. In vitro studies have shown that quadriceps forces increase ACL strain, and hamstring forces decrease ACL strain. However, the magnitude of the effect of the quadriceps and hamstrings forces on ACL loading and its timing during in vivo landings remains unclear. Purpose: To investigate the effect and timing of knee muscle forces on ACL loading during landing. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 13 young female athletes performed drop vertical jump trials, and their movements were recorded with 3-dimensional motion capture. Lower limb joint motion and muscle forces were estimated with OpenSim and applied to a musculoskeletal finite element (FE) model to estimate ACL loading during landings. The FE simulations were performed with 5 different conditions that included/excluded kinematics, ground-reaction force (GRF), and muscle forces. Results: Simulation of landing kinematics without GRF or muscle forces yielded an estimated median ACL strain and force of 5.1% and 282.6 N. Addition of GRF to kinematic simulations increased ACL strain and force to 6.8% and 418.4 N ( P < .05). Addition of quadriceps force to kinematics + GRF simulations nonsignificantly increased ACL strain and force to 7.2% and 478.5 N. Addition of hamstrings force to kinematics + GRF simulations decreased ACL strain and force to 2.6% and 171.4 N ( P < .001). Addition of all muscles to kinematics + GRF simulations decreased ACL strain and force to 3.3% and 195.1 N ( P < .001). With hamstrings force, ACL loading decreased from initial contact (time of peak: 1-18 milliseconds) while ACL loading without hamstrings force peaked at 47 to 98 milliseconds after initial contact ( P = .024-.001). The knee flexion angle increased from 20.9° to 73.1° within 100 milliseconds after initial contact. Conclusion: Hamstrings activation had greater effect relative to GRF and quadriceps activation on ACL loading, which significantly decreased and regulated the magnitude and timing of ACL loading during in vivo landings. Clinical Relevance: Clinical training should focus on strategies that influence increased hamstrings activation during landing to reduce ACL loads.

Background: Frontal plane trunk lean with a side-to-side difference in lower extremity kinematics during landing increases unilateral knee abduction moment and consequently anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. However, the biomechanical features of landing with higher ACL loading are still unknown. Validated musculoskeletal modeling offers the potential to quantify ACL strain and force during a landing task. Purpose: To investigate ACL loading during a landing and assess the association between ACL loading and biomechanical factors of individual landing strategies. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Thirteen young female athletes performed drop vertical jump trials, and their movements were recorded with 3-dimensional motion capture. Electromyography-informed optimization was performed to estimate lower limb muscle forces with an OpenSim musculoskeletal model. A whole-body musculoskeletal finite element model was developed. The joint motion and muscle forces obtained from the OpenSim simulations were applied to the musculoskeletal finite element model to estimate ACL loading during participants’ simulated landings with physiologic knee mechanics. Kinematic, muscle force, and ground-reaction force waveforms associated with high ACL strain trials were reconstructed via principal component analysis and logistic regression analysis, which were used to predict trials with high ACL strain. Results: The median (interquartile range) values of peak ACL strain and force during the drop vertical jump were 3.3% (–1.9% to 5.1%) and 195.1 N (53.9 to 336.9 N), respectively. Four principal components significantly predicted high ACL strain trials, with 100% sensitivity, 78% specificity, and an area of 0.91 under the receiver operating characteristic curve ( P < .001). High ACL strain trials were associated with (1) knee motions that included larger knee abduction, internal tibial rotation, and anterior tibial translation and (2) motion that included greater vertical and lateral ground-reaction forces, lower gluteus medius force, larger lateral pelvic tilt, and increased hip adduction. Conclusion: ACL loads were higher with a pivot-shift mechanism during a simulated landing with asymmetry in the frontal plane. Specifically, knee abduction can create compression on the posterior slope of the lateral tibial plateau, which induces anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation. Clinical Relevance: Athletes are encouraged to perform interventional and preventive training to improve symmetry during landing.

Background: A recently developed mechanical impact simulator induced an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture via the application of a combination of inverse dynamics–based knee abduction moment (KAM), anterior tibial shear force (ATS), and internal tibial rotation moment with impulsive compression in a cohort of cadaveric limbs. However, there remains an opportunity to further define the interaction of internal forces and moments at the knee and their respective influence on injury events. Purpose: To identify the influence of internal knee loads on an ACL injury event using a cadaveric impact simulator. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Drop-landing simulations were performed and analyzed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with a validated mechanical impact simulator. Internal forces and moments at the knee joint center were calculated using data from a 6-axis load cell recorded on the femur during testing. Kinetic data from a total of 1083 trials that included 30 ACL injury trials were used as inputs for principal component (PC) analysis to identify the most critical features of loading waveforms. Logistic regression analysis with a stepwise selection was used to select the PCs that predicted an ACL injury. Injurious waveforms were reconstructed with selected PCs in logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 3 PCs were selected in logistic regression analysis that developed a significant model ( P < .001). The external loading of KAM was highly correlated with PC1 (ρ < –0.8; P < .001), which explained the majority (>69%) of the injurious waveforms reconstructed with the 3 selected PCs. The injurious waveforms demonstrated a larger internal knee adduction moment and lateral tibial force. After the ACL was ruptured, decreased posterior tibial force was observed in injury trials. Conclusion: These findings give us a better understanding of ACL injury mechanisms using 6-axis kinetics from an in vitro simulator. An ACL rupture was correlated with an internal knee adduction moment (external KAM) and was augmented by ATS and lateral tibial force induced by an impact, which distorted the ACL insertion orientation. Clinical Relevance: The ACL injury mechanism explained in this study may help target injury prevention programs to decrease injurious knee loading (KAM, ATS, and lateral tibial force) during landing tasks.

ABSTRACTThe mechanism underlying non‐contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is multi‐factorial and still an object of debate. Computational models, in combination with in vivo and cadaveric studies, can provide valuable insight into the contribution of the different factors involved. The goal of this study was to validate four knee finite element models (two males and two females) to kinematic and strain data collected in vitro with an impact‐driven simulator and use them to assess how secondary external knee loads (knee abduction moment [KAM], anterior shear force, and internal rotation torque [ITR]) affect tibiofemoral contact forces and ACL force during impact. Four subject‐specific knee models were developed from specimen computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral ligament properties were calibrated to match experimentally measured kinematics and ligament strain. Average root mean square errors and correlations between experimental and model‐predicted knee kinematics were below 1.5 mm and 2°, and above 0.75, respectively. Similar errors and correlations were obtained for ACL strain (< 2% and > 0.9). Model‐predicted ACL forces were highly correlated with the anterior component of the tibiofemoral contact force on the lateral plateau occurring during impact (r = 0.99), which was increased by larger KAM and ITR through the posterior tibial slope and a larger contact force on the lateral side. This study provides a better understanding of the mechanism through which secondary external knee loads increase ACL injury risk during landing. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1730–1742, 2019