Back to Authors

Aiyer, Amiethab A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-2770

Mayo Clinic

Johns Hopkins University

Citations 4

Prior Calf Strain as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Rupture in National Basketball Association Players: A Retrospective Analysis
Elsabbagh, Zaid , Le, Ysa, Bcharah, George , Ryu, David , Hsu, Nigel , Thompson, John Michael, Aiyer, Amiethab, Le, Ysa , Ryu, David , Badin, Daniel , Thompson, John Michael, Aiyer, Amiethab A.

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | June 12, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/23259671261449170 Get It

Background: Achilles tendon ruptures are among the most debilitating injuries in professional basketball, often leading to prolonged absence and long-term performance decline. While calf strains are common among National Basketball Association (NBA) athletes, their role as a precursor to Achilles rupture remains poorly understood. Hypothesis: A previous calf strain would be associated with increased odds of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players and that affected players would experience significant post-injury performance declines. Study Design: Case-cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Publicly available data on NBA players from 1958 to 2024 were analyzed, with the data search conducted in June 2025. Players with Achilles ruptures (n = 60) were compared with players with calf strains who did not sustain a rupture (n = 258). Logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index, position, starter status, and workload. Pre- and postinjury performance was evaluated over 2 seasons using paired t tests. Descriptive analyses characterized injury laterality, game context, quarter, shoe type, and draft position. Video review assessed injury mechanisms. Results: Previous calf strain was associated with increased odds of Achilles rupture (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.16-5.22; P = .02). Among those with both injuries, 85.7% occurred on the same side, with a mean interval of 1.9 years. Of all players, a total of 75% returned to play. Postinjury declines were observed in player efficiency rating (−2.46), win shares (−3.23), games played (−260.3), and minutes per game (−5.19) (all P < .001). Return was more likely in younger players and those on multiyear contracts. Video analysis revealed a consistent “false step” mechanism in 95% of cases with footage. Most Achilles tendon ruptures occurred during in-game activity, while shoe type was evaluated descriptively and was not associated with player position or preinjury workload. Conclusion: Our study showed that previous calf strain is associated with an increased risk of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players and may serve as a clinically identifiable risk marker. Rupture leads to substantial and sustained performance decline, even among those who return. Targeted rehabilitation and movement retraining may help mitigate progression to rupture in high-risk athletes.
Ankle Telemedicine Planning Considerations
Applewhite, Andres I. , Denay, Keri L., Hilgefort, Jordan, Bertasi, Raphael A.O. , Arizpe, Azael, Kinaszczuk, Anja M., Hodgens, Blake H. , Aiyer, Amiethab A. , Pujalte, George , Aiyer, Amiethab , Pujalte, George G A , Kinaszczuk, Anja M.

Foot & Ankle Specialist | June 7, 2023 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 38S-52S

10.1177/19386400231173836 Get It

A virtual medical visit, also known as telemedicine or telehealth, is a valuable alternative method of providing health care to patients who do not have easy access to a hospital, or during times when limited social interaction is crucial such as our current COVID-19 pandemic. A virtual approach to evaluating musculoskeletal system ailments is particularly challenging, for diagnosis of these conditions generally rely greatly on physical examination, which may be challenging. However, a properly planned and executed telemedicine visit will yield successful results in most cases. Our aim is to produce a document with instructions and suggestions, including physical examination maneuvers, to help physicians carry out a proper virtual medical visit with patients complaining of ankle musculoskeletal problems. Virtual visits should not be thought of as a replacement for traditional face-to-face medical consultations, but rather a complementary method to provide health care when deemed appropriate. By following this guide, and tailoring it to the specific case at hand, medical providers should be able to effectively carry out a successful telemedicine consultation for musculoskeletal ailments relating to the ankle. Levels of Evidence: Level V
Foot evaluation via telephone and video virtual medical visits
Applewhite, Andres I. , Pujalte, George , Denay, Keri L., Odom, Mitchell , Arizpe, Azael, Albano‐Aluquin, Shirley , Kinaszczuk, Anja M., Aiyer, Amiethab A. , Pujalte, George G A , Tu, Priscilla

Musculoskeletal Care | May 7, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 772-783

10.1002/msc.1642 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTelemedicine plays a very important role in our society by allowing providers to treat patients who do not have easy access to a healthcare facility, especially in the setting of the COVID‐19 pandemic.ObjectiveWe aimed to create an extensive, yet concise guide for medical providers to virtually evaluate patients with foot concerns.MethodsThis article outlines how to conduct a well‐planned virtual consultation with specific questions, instructions, and examination manoeuvres to navigate musculoskeletal foot problems.ConclusionWith this narrative review, we have provided a guide with suggestions, questions and interpretations of answers to help physicians new to the practice of telemedicine have successful virtual encounters with patients suffering from foot musculoskeletal ailments.
2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions
Schwarz, Edward M. , Gehrke, Thorsten , Aiyer, Amiethab A. , Battenberg, Andrew K. , Brown, Scot , Callaghan, John J. , Egol, Kenneth A. , Garrigues, Grant E. , Ghert, Michelle , Goswami, Karan , Hammound, Sommer, McLaren, A. C. , Mont, Michael A. , Namdari, Surena , Obremskey, William T. , O’Toole, Robert V. , Raikin, Steven M. , Restrepo, Camilo , Ricciardi, Benjamin F. , Saeed, Kordo , Shohat, Noam , Tan, Timothy L. , Thirukumaran, Caroline P. , Winters, Brian S., Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin, Schwarz, Edward M , Parvizi, Javad , Gehrke, Thorsten A. , Çıtak, Mustafa , Green, Andrew , Kates, Stephen L. , Sánchez‐Sotelo, Joaquín

Journal of Orthopaedic Research | April 12, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 997-1006

10.1002/jor.24293 Get It

ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal infections (MSKI) remain the bane of orthopedic surgery, and result in grievous illness and inordinate costs that threaten healthcare systems. As prevention, diagnosis, and treatment has remained largely unchanged over the last 50 years, a 2nd International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (ICM 2018, https://icmphilly.com ) was completed. Questions pertaining to all areas of MSKI were extensively researched to prepare recommendations, which were discussed and voted on by the delegates using the Delphi methodology. The questions, including the General Assembly (GA) results, have been published ( GA questions ). However, as critical outcomes include: (i) incidence and cost data that substantiate the problems, and (ii) establishment of research priorities; an ICM 2018 research workgroup (RW) was assembled to accomplish these tasks. Here, we present the result of the RW consensus on the current and projected incidence of infection, and the costs per patient, for all orthopedic subspecialties, which range from 0.1% to 30%, and $17,000 to $150,000. The RW also identified the most important research questions. The Delphi methodology was utilized to initially derive four objective criteria to define a subset of the 164 GA questions that are high priority for future research. Thirty‐eight questions (23% of all GA questions) achieved the requisite > 70% agreement vote, and are highlighted in this Consensus article within six thematic categories: acute versus chronic infection, host immunity, antibiotics, diagnosis, research caveats, and modifiable factors. Finally, the RW emphasizes that without appropriate funding to address these high priority research questions, a 3rd ICM on MSKI to address similar issues at greater cost is inevitable.