Loftus, Edward V.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at significantly increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). CDI in IBD is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, IBD treatment failure, re-hospitalization and high CDI recurrence rates. The existing literature on predictors of these adverse outcomes is limited. We evaluated four potentially modifiable novel risk factors (BMI, statin use, opioid use, and antidepressant use) on the risk and outcomes of CDI in patients with IBD. METHODS: CDI disease severity and other clinical outcomes, including colon surgery, CDI recurrence, CDI-related hospitalization, IBD exacerbations, and mortality were abstracted using the electronic medical record. Additionally, variables including BMI, statin use, opioid use, and antidepressant use at the time of CDI were abstracted from records for patients with IBD and CDI from 2008 and 2013. Statistical analysis comprised of descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 137 patients with IBD and CDI included in this study: 70 with ulcerative colitis (51%), 63 with Crohn's disease (46%), and 4 with indeterminate colitis (3%). The median age was 46 years, and 55% were female. On multivariate analysis controlling for age, 43% of patients in the overweight BMI category had severe or severe complicated CDI, compared to 22% of patients in the underweight/normal BMI (OR, 2.85, P = 0.02) and 19% in the obese category (OR, 3.95, P = 0.04). Statin use was associated with severe or severe complicated CDI when controlling for age and BMI (OR, 5.66, P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis controlling for age and CDI severity, there was no association between statin use and post-CDI IBD exacerbations. Opioid and antidepressant use were not associated with CDI disease severity or IBD exacerbations. BMI category, statin use, opioid use, and antidepressant use were not associated with colon surgery, CDI recurrence, CDI-related hospitalizations, or mortality at 1 year. CONCLUSION: An overweight BMI and statin use were associated with severe or severe complicated CDI. There was no association between statin use and IBD exacerbations following CDI. Opioid and antidepressant use were not associated with disease severity or frequency of IBD exacerbations following CDI. Further studies are needed to better understand how these results could impact management of patients with IBD to improve clinical outcomes and potentially reduce the risk of CDI.

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Tofacitinib safety in patients (pts) with UC was evaluated in an 8-week induction Phase (P) 2 study (NCT00787202), 1 2 8-week induction P3 studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 & 2; NCT01465763 & NCT01458951), 2 a 52-week maintenance P3 study (NCT01458574), and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (OCTAVE Open, NCT01470612). 3 We present updated infections data (Sep 2018) from the tofacitinib UC clinical program. 4,5 METHODS: Pts receiving placebo, tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) were analyzed as Induction (P2 & P3, n = 1220), Maintenance (P3, N = 592), and Overall (pts in P2, P3 & OLE receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID, N = 1157 [Sep 2018]) Cohorts. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; pts with events per 100 pt-years [PY] of exposure) were evaluated for infections of special interest (incl. serious infections [SIs], opportunistic infections [OIs; independently adjudicated], and herpes zoster [HZ]). RESULTS: A total of 1157 pts received ≥1 dose of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID (83% predominantly 10 mg BID [avg. daily dose ≥15 mg]), with 2403.6 PY of exposure (median 623 days, up to 6.1 years of treatment). The Table 1 shows infection IRs by Cohort. In the Overall Cohort, nasopharyngitis was the most frequent infection. For SIs, the Overall Cohort “Tofacitinib All” IR (1.75 [95% CI 1.27, 2.36]) was similar to the Maintenance Cohort IRs for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID. No SIs resulted in death. OIs were infrequent (28 pts) and most were HZ (24 pts; IR 0.99 [95% CI 0.63, 1.47]), mostly cutaneous. Not all HZ events were OIs; 83 pts overall had HZ events (IR 3.57 [95% CI 2.84, 4.43]; 6 serious). CONCLUSION: In induction, SIs and OIs occurred with tofacitinib but not with placebo. Overall, SIs were generally infrequent and Overall Cohort IRs did not suggest increased risk with longer tofacitinib treatment vs the Maintenance Cohort. Non-HZ OIs were rare. SI incidence was similar in the UC and rheumatoid arthritis programs (incl. increased HZ risk) 6 and to other UC therapies incl. biologics. 7

INTRODUCTION: VARSITY is the first head-to-head trial comparing the efficacy and safety of 2 biologic therapies, vedolizumab (VDZ) and adalimumab (ADA), in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We previously reported significantly higher rates of clinical remission (31.3% vs 22.5%; P = 0.0061) and endoscopic improvement (39.7% vs 27.7%; P = 0.0005) at Week (Wk) 52 with VDZ vs ADA. 1 METHODS: VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study (NCT02497469; EudraCT 2015-000939-33). Here we report the predefined, exploratory endpoints of early clinical response and clinical remission (defined in the Table 1) within the first 14 wks, as well as durable clinical remission (patients in clinical remission at Wk 14 and Wk 52). RESULTS: A total of 769 patients received ≥1 dose of VDZ (n = 383) or ADA (n = 386). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. A trend for separation in clinical response started to emerge at Wk 6 favoring VDZ vs ADA. Clinical response at Wk 14 favored VDZ vs ADA (257 [67.1%] vs 177 [45.9%]; treatment difference 21.2%). More patients achieved clinical remission at Wk 14 on VDZ vs ADA (102 [26.6%] vs 82 [21.2%]; treatment difference 5.3%). Patients on VDZ achieved higher rates of durable clinical remission (70 [18.3%] vs 46 [11.9%]); laboratory results correlated with these findings. Post hoc analyses showed a larger mean (standard deviation) change of C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to Wk 14 (−32.88 [155.77] nmol/L VDZ vs −3.35 [260.81] nmol/L ADA) and to Wk 52 (−50.87 [174.76] nmol/L VDZ vs −37.21 [169.17] nmol/L ADA) in favor of VDZ. Greater mean declines in fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels were seen in patients on VDZ compared with ADA (Wk 14: −1,551.3 [6,236.70] mg/kg VDZ vs −1,167.6 [4,647.67] mg/kg ADA; Wk 52: −2,187.3 [7,440.42] mg/kg VDZ vs −1,846.6 [4,560.55] mg/kg ADA). CONCLUSION: Patients on VDZ had numerically higher rates of both clinical response and clinical remission by Wk 14 compared with ADA. Patients on VDZ also achieved higher rates of durable clinical remission compared with ADA. CRP and FCP results correlated with these findings. These data on early clinical response and clinical remission, as well as durable remission, further support the use of VDZ over ADA in patients with moderately to severely active UC.

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Tofacitinib safety and efficacy were demonstrated in patients (pts) with moderate to severe UC in 3 Phase 3 studies, 1 and are being evaluated in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study. 2 METHODS: We present updated safety and efficacy data from the OCTAVE Open OLE study (NCT01470612; Sep 2018; database not locked) 2 in completers/treatment failures in OCTAVE Sustain (NCT01458574) or non-responders in OCTAVE Induction 1/2 (NCT01465763/NCT01458951). Week (Wk) 8 data (OCTAVE Induction 1/2) and Wk 52 (completers) or early-termination data (OCTAVE Sustain) determined eligibility. Pts in remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no individual subscore >1, rectal bleeding subscore 0) at Wk 52 of OCTAVE Sustain (central read) received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) in the OLE study; all others received 10 mg BID. At Month 2, all pts had endoscopy, and induction non-responders with no clinical response were withdrawn. Incidence rates (IRs; unique pts with events per 100 pt-years [PY]) for adverse events (AEs) of special interest were calculated. Efficacy endpoints were derived from Mayo score (local read). RESULTS: Of 944 pts receiving ≥1 tofacitinib dose (for up to 5.5 years), 175 (18.5%) and 769 (81.5%) received 5 and 10 mg BID, respectively (454 and 1550 PY, respectively). 337 (35.7%) pts discontinued due to insufficient clinical response and 78 (8.3%) due to AEs excl. worsening UC. The most frequent AE class was infections and infestations (52.1%). The most frequent AEs were nasopharyngitis (20.3%) and worsening UC (19.5%). IRs (95% CI) for “Tofacitinib All” were: serious infections 1.61 (1.10, 2.27); herpes zoster (all) 3.35 (2.58, 4.27); major adverse cardiovascular events 0.15 (0.03, 0.44); malignancies excl. non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0.85 (0.50, 1.36); and NMSC 0.81 (0.46, 1.32), with no clustering of malignancy type. Table 1 shows AEs and IRs by dose. No new safety risks were identified. Table 2 shows efficacy data at Month 36. CONCLUSION: In pts with UC in the OLE study, no new safety risks emerged at 5.5 years vs earlier OLE analyses 2 or with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Efficacy data continue to support long-term efficacy of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID up to 36 months beyond OCTAVE Sustain.

INTRODUCTION: An unmet need exists to find effective therapy in more severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, especially those who have failed multiple therapies. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor, has been assessed in an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2b induction study in adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC (U-ACHIEVE). 1,2 METHODS: In U-ACHIEVE, adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as determined by the Adapted Mayo Score (5-9 points and centrally-read endoscopy subscore 2-3) were randomized to receive extended-release upadacitinib 7.5, 15, 30, 45 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 8 weeks. In the current sub-analysis, the efficacy of upadacitinib in more severe and/or more refractory patient populations was assessed. Patients who at baseline had failed ≥2 prior biologic agents, had pancolitis, and/or an Adapted Mayo score >7, were included. Pairwise comparisons between upadacitinib doses and placebo for the primary endpoint, clinical remission per Adapted Mayo Score at Week 8 (defined as stool frequency subscore ≤1, rectal bleeding subscore = 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1) and secondary endpoints were conducted using the Fisher's Exact test and no multiplicity adjustments were applied. Non-responder imputation was utilized for missing values. RESULTS: At baseline, 142 (56.8% of the total study population) patients had failed ≥2 prior biologics, 135 (54.0%) patients had pancolitis, and 90 (36.0%) patients had an Adapted Mayo score >7. The proportions of patients achieving endoscopic improvement, clinical response per Adapted Mayo score, and clinical response per Partial Mayo score were significantly higher (nominal P -value < 0.05) with upadacitinib doses ≥30 mg QD versus the placebo group in patients who failed ≥2 biologics or had pancolitis at baseline (Table 1). Trends of higher proportions of patients achieving clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score, endoscopic improvement, clinical response per Adapted Mayo score, and clinical response per Partial Mayo score were observed with all upadacitinib groups versus placebo in all the sub-analyses. CONCLUSION: In this dose-ranging induction study, upadacitinib demonstrated greater efficacy compared to placebo with dose response in the more severe and refractory population; significantly greater efficacy was demonstrated with upadacitinib at doses ≥30 mg QD for most of the endpoints evaluated.

INTRODUCTION: There are multiple assays for infliximab (IFX) trough level (IFX-TL) and antibody (ATI) measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the correlation and outcomes of IFX-TL and ATI measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS: This was a prospective study of IFX-treated IBD patients undergoing drug monitoring with an ECLIA panel (Esoterix Laboratories). Residual serum samples were used to simultaneously quantify IFX-TL via LC-MS/MS and ATI via an in-house ECLIA (iECLIA) (Mayo Clinic). Both LC-MS/MS and iECLIA have been previously validated. Primary outcomes: IFX-TL and ATI comparison between the two assays. Secondary outcomes: association of IFX-TL and ATI with clinical remission, mucosal healing (MH) (absence of ulcers in Crohn's disease and Mayo endoscopic score ≤1 for ulcerative colitis) and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP ≤8 mg/L). RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (median age 32 years (12-84), 45.7% female) (Table 1). Median IFX-TL was 7 mcg/mL (IQR: 1.3, 19.4) and 6 mcg/mL (IQR: 0.9, 20) via LC-MS/MS and ECLIA, respectively (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.975). Median IFX-TL via LC-MS/MS was not significantly different between patients in clinical remission, response and no response (5.7 vs. 8.4 vs. 2.3 mcg/mL, respectively; P = 0.46), but significantly higher in patients who had a normal CRP (11.1 vs. 1.4 mcg/mL; P < 0.001) and in those who achieved MH (13.1 mcg/mL vs. 3.9 mcg/mL; P = 0.01). ATI was detected in 13/142 (9.2%) via iECLIA and 39/151 (25.8%) via ECLIA. The frequency of ATI detection via iECLIA was lower in patients in clinical remission or response than no response (7.3% vs. 9.3% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.68). On the contrary, the frequency of ATI detection via ECLIA was higher in patients with clinical remission (35.7%) than response (18.7%) and comparable to patients who had no clinical response (40%) ( P = 0.05) (Table 2). The frequency of ATI was not significantly different between patients who did and did not achieve MH or had normal CRP using both assays (Table 2). CONCLUSION: IFX-TL was comparable between LC-MS/MS and ECLIA assays. IFX-TL correlated with MH and normal CRP but not clinical remission. Frequency of ATI detection was not significantly associated with outcomes via both methods. ATI detected via iECLIA showed a trend towards correlation with clinical outcomes compared to ECLIA.

INTRODUCTION: Combination immunomodulator (IMM) with infliximab (IFX) has been shown to be superior to IFX monotherapy therapy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is unclear if this is related to IMM solely or higher IFX trough level (IFX-TL). The aims of this study are to examine the correlation of IFX-TL with clinical outcomes of IBD patients and to evaluate whether IFX-TL or combination IMM therapy correlate best with mucosal healing (MH). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive IFX treated IBD patients undergoing drug monitoring with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). IMM included either thiopurines or methotrexate. Primary analyses included: comparing IFX-TL with clinical remission, MH (absence of mucosal ulcers in Crohn's disease (CD) and Mayo endoscopic score ≤1 for ulcerative colitis (UC)) and normal c-reactive protein (CRP ≤8 mg/L). Secondary analyses included determining an IFX-TL cut off to achieve MH and evaluating the predictors of MH (IMM vs. IFX-TL). RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (67% CD, 24% UC, 6% indeterminate colitis, 3% pouchitis) (Table 1). The median IFX-TL was 7 mcg/mL (IQR: 1.3, 19.4). The distribution of IFX-TL was not significantly different between patients in clinical remission, response and no response (median: 5.7 vs. 8.4 vs. 2.3 mcg/mL, respectively; P = 0.46). The median IFX-TL was significantly higher in patients who had a normal CRP (11.1 vs. 1.4 mcg/mL; P < 0.001) and in those who achieved MH (13.1 mcg/mL vs. 3.9 mcg/mL; P = 0.01). An IFX-TL ≥7.5 mcg/mL predicted MH with a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 64% (AUC = 0.67; Figure 1). Combination therapy was associated with higher IFX-TL (median: 15.8 vs. 4.6 mcg/mL; P < 0.001). In a multivariable model to predict MH based on IFX-TL (continuously), combination therapy (yes vs no), dosing frequency (≥8 vs <8 weeks), and albumin (<3.5 vs ≥3.5), higher IFX-TL was associated with higher likelihood of MH (OR for 5-mcg/mL increase: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.39; P = 0.04). In this model, IMM combination was not significant (OR: 0.79, P = 0.66), neither was dosing frequency (OR: 1.44, P = 0.48). Low albumin showed lower likelihood of MH, but this was not statistically significant (OR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02-1.16, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: IFX-TL was associated with normal CRP and MH but not clinical remission in this cohort of IBD patients. IFX-TL and not combination IMM therapy was independently associated with MH.

BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding the association of preoperative biologic exposure and postoperative outcomes remains controversial for both antitumor necrosis factor agents and vedolizumab and largely unknown for ustekinumab. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the rates of 30-day postoperative overall infectious complications and intra-abdominal septic complications among the 3 classes of biologic therapies as compared with no biologic therapy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an IBD referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with Crohn’s disease who received an antitumor necrosis factor, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or no biologic therapy within 12 weeks of a major abdominal operation between May 20, 2014, and December 31, 2017, were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Thirty-day overall postoperative infectious complications and intra-abdominal septic complications were measured. RESULTS: A total of 712 patients with Crohn’s disease were included; 272 patients were exposed to an antitumor necrosis factor agents, 127 to vedolizumab, 38 to ustekinumab, and 275 to no biologic therapy within the 12 weeks before an abdominal operation. Patients exposed to a biologic were more likely to be taking a concurrent immunomodulator, but there was no difference in concurrent corticosteroid usage. The particular class of biologic was not independently associated with total overall infectious complications. Vedolizumab was associated with an increased rate of intra-abdominal sepsis on univariate analysis but not on multivariable analysis. Combination immunosuppression was associated with both an increased rate of overall postoperative infectious complications and intra-abdominal sepsis. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design and single-center data. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of total infectious complications or intra-abdominal septic complications was not increased based on preoperative exposure to a particular class of biologic. Rates increased with combination immunosuppression of biologic therapy with corticosteroids and previous abdominal resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B24. BIOLÓGICOS Y COMPLICACIONES POSTOPERATORIAS DE 30 DÍAS DESPUÉS DE LAS OPERACIONES ABDOMINALES PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: ¿EXISTEN DIFERENCIAS EN LOS PERFILES DE SEGURIDAD?: ANTECEDENTES: La evidencia sobre la asociación de la exposición biológica preoperatoria y los resultados postoperatorios sigue siendo controvertida controversial tanto para los agentes del factor de necrosis tumoral (anti-TNF) como para el vedolizumab, y en gran parte desconocida para el ustekinumab. OBJETIVO: Determinar las diferencias en las tasas de complicaciones infecciosas generales postoperatorias de 30 días y complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales entre las tres clases de terapias biológicas en comparación con ninguna terapia biológica. DISEÑO: Revisión retrospectiva. AMBIENTE: centro de referencia de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. PACIENTES: Pacientes adultos con enfermedad de Crohn que recibieron un factor de necrosis antitumoral, vedolizumab, ustekinumab o ningún tratamiento biológico dentro de las 12 semanas de una operación abdominal mayor entre el 5/20/2014 y el 12/31/2017. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales de 30 días, complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron setecientos doce pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn; 272 pacientes fueron expuestos a un anti-TNF, 127 a vedolizumab, 38 a ustekinumab y 275 a ninguna terapia biológica dentro de las 12 semanas previas a una operación abdominal. Los pacientes expuestos a un producto biológico tenían más probabilidades de tomar un inmunomodulador concurrente, pero no hubo diferencias en el uso simultáneo de corticosteroides. La clase particular de productos biológicos no se asoció de forma independiente con las complicaciones infecciosas totales. Vedolizumab se asoció con una mayor tasa de sepsis intraabdominal en el análisis univariable, pero no en el análisis multivariable. La inmunosupresión combinada se asoció tanto con una mayor tasa de complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales como con sepsis intraabdominal. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo, datos de centro único. CONCLUSIONES: La tasa general de complicaciones infecciosas totales o complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales no aumentó en función de la exposición preoperatoria a una clase particular de productos biológicos. Las tasas aumentaron con la combinación de inmunosupresión de la terapia biológica con corticosteroides y resección abdominal previa. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B24.

Abstract Background We aim to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) conference on the management of patients with complex IBD. Methods Data were collected during each conference from February 2017 through October 2018 with chart review performed at 6 months to determine if conference recommendations were successfully implemented. Results Eighty-five patients were discussed. The presenting diagnosis was changed by 11.8%. Recommendations for further testing, medical therapy, and surgery were successfully implemented in 77.1%, 98.1%, and 88.4%, respectively. Conclusions This study supports the role of IBD multidisciplinary conferences in the management of patients with complex IBD.