Hall, S.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the benefit of sublesional bevacizumab injection for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) as used in a typical clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with RRP treated between 2011 and 2016 was undertaken. All patients were treated with in-office potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser photoablation. Sublesional bevacizumab injection was used based on joint patient-physician decision making. Papilloma burden was objectively measured on prior recordings by 2 blinded reviewers and described as vocal fold segments affected (VFSA) by papilloma. Each patient served as their own control by comparing times when bevacizumab was or was not used. Mixed model for longitudinal data was used to determine if the previous use of bevacizumab decreased the disease burden. Results: A total of 19 patients met inclusion criteria and all prior laryngoscopic exams were reviewed for VFSA as described above. The mean (SD) number of VFSA when bevacizumab was not used at the prior procedure was 15 (14) as compared to 8 (11) when bevacizumab was used. When adjusted for age, time from initial presentation and baseline disease burden, mixed model showed a decrease of 11 VFSA (95% CI 6.5, 15.5, P < .0001) when bevacizumab was used as compared to when bevacizumab was not used at the prior procedure. In mixed model analysis, there was not a significant association between bevacizumab dose used and VFSA at the subsequent visit ( P = .8). Conclusion: Using sublesional bevacizumab intermittently based on clinical findings appears to be effective in improving disease control. Papilloma burden is significantly decreased at the subsequent clinical follow-up following injection of sublesional bevacizumab. The beneficial effect of sublesional bevacizumab may be not be dose-dependent.

Abstract The use of diced cartilage grafting is a powerful tool during rhinoplasty for dorsal augmentation; however, its application to nasal structural reconstruction has rarely been reported. Here we present a unique technique for Mohs defect reconstruction combining diced cartilage graft for dorsal augmentation and a folded paramedian forehead flap for soft tissue. A 54-year-old female presented with recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the nose that had been previously resected 3 times in the past. This was treated with Mohs surgery resulting in a through and through nasal defect. This was reconstructed with a staged folded paramedian forehead flap with staged. Due to a loss of dorsal volume and definition creating an excess supratip break, a diced cartilage graft with fibrin glue and temporalis fascia was used for dorsal augmentation. The use of diced cartilage has regained popularity over the last 2 decades with multiple techniques utilizing diced cartilage alone, wrapped in fascia, covered in fascia, wrapped in oxidized methylcellulose, or solidified with fibrin glue. Literature describing the use of fibrin glue suggests that it improves wound healing by promoting cartilage growth, stabilization, and diffusion of nutrients to the graft. Its malleable nature allows for adjustments after the initial placement. This report demonstrates the viability of diced cartilage graft for dorsal augmentation with a paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. This technique can serve as a powerful tool for the nasal reconstructive surgeon needing scaffolding to rebuild and define the nasal dorsum.

AbstractBackgroundThe American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition introduces a staging system specific for human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal cancer with separate clinical (AJCC 8c) and pathological (AJCC 8p) criteria.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, preoperative imaging and pathology reports were used to stage patients based on the AJCC 8c and AJCC 8p criteria, respectively. The primary endpoint was agreement between AJCC 8c and AJCC 8p.ResultsA total of 213 patients met inclusion criteria. Kappa statistics showed poor agreement (κ = 0.3275) between AJCC 8c and AJCC 8p. In total, 30.3% of patient's preoperative AJCC 8c stage changed based on the postoperative pathologic staging (AJCC 8p) with 73.4% of those being upstaged.ConclusionThese data suggest that disagreement exists between AJCC 8c and AJCC 8p, in part due to the separate clinical and pathological staging criteria. This discrepancy should be considered as the new system is implemented.