Sarraj, Mohamed

Background. Negative pressure wound therapy promotes wound healing through fluid removal, edema reduction, and mechanical contraction. A novel thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) dressing has been developed to improve exudate evacuation and reduce tissue ingrowth, but its effect on wound contraction compared with reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) remains unclear. Objective. To compare the degree of wound contraction with the TPE dressing, ROCF, or no filler at different wound depths and negative pressure settings in a porcine explant model. Materials and Methods. The effect of the materials or lack thereof on wound contraction was investigated at 2 wound depths (shallow, deep) and 3 negative pressure settings (−50 mm Hg, −80 mm Hg, and −125 mm Hg). Wound width was measured at 3 standardized locations before and during therapy. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with contraction. Results. A total of 810 measurements were obtained. Both the TPE dressing and ROCF demonstrated statistically significantly greater contraction than no filler. In deep wounds, greater contraction was noted with the TPE dressing compared with ROCF. Higher negative pressure and increased wound depth were independently associated with greater contraction. Absolute differences in contraction between dressings were small (<3 mm across all conditions). Conclusion. The TPE dressing provides equivalent or greater wound contraction compared with ROCF, particularly in deep wounds, without impairing macrodeformation. Given the small magnitude of differences, the clinical relevance of this finding likely depends on additional factors, which should be evaluated in future in vivo studies.

Background: C5 palsy is a known complication following decompressive cervical spine surgery, most often attributed to factors such as foraminal stenosis, cord drift, or traction. While its incidence after cervical procedures is well-documented, C5 palsy occurring after thoracolumbar deformity surgery has not been previously described. Case: A 70-year-old woman with a prior C2-T4 posterior cervical spinal fusion underwent thoracolumbar deformity correction with T4-pelvis fusion. Two months postoperatively, she developed sudden right deltoid and biceps weakness. Laboratory and imaging workups ruled out other pathological causes, and electromyography confirmed a new C5 palsy. She was treated with physical therapy and electrical stimulation and achieved complete recovery by 6 months post-thoracolumbar surgery. Conclusion: This case describes isolated delayed C5 palsy following thoracolumbar deformity surgery in a patient with prior cervical spine fusion 2 years earlier. Potential contributing factors include global alignment changes, altered neural tension, and intrinsic anatomic fragility of the C5 nerve root. This presentation expands the clinical context of postoperative C5 palsy and highlights the importance of monitoring for cervical neurologic deficits, even in the absence of cervical intervention. Level of Evidence: 5 – Case Report

Unfortunately, the middle name of Olufemi R. Ayeni was accidentally omitted in the original publication and the author name is corrected here. The original article has been corrected.

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this review was to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either meniscal repair or meniscectomy for concomitant meniscal injury. The primary hypothesis was that short‐term clinical outcomes (≤ 2‐year follow‐up) for ACLR concomitant with either meniscal repair or resection would be similar. The secondary hypothesis was that ACLR with meniscal repair would result in better longer term outcomes compared with meniscal resection.MethodsThe authors searched two online databases (EMBASE and MEDLINE) from inception until March 2018 for the literature on ACLR and concurrent meniscal surgery. Two reviewers systematically screened studies in duplicate, independently, and based on a priori criteria. Quality assessment was also performed in duplicate. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sub‐scale scores at 2 years post‐operatively were combined in a meta‐analysis of proportions using a random‐effects model.ResultsOf 2566 initial studies, 25 studies satisfied full‐text inclusion criteria. Mean follow‐up was 2.09 years, with a total sample of 37,087 subjects including controls. The meta‐analysis demonstrated equivocal results at 2 years, except for KOOS symptom scores which favoured meniscal resection over repair. Mean KT‐1000 side‐to‐side difference (SSD) scores were 1.51 ± 0.60 mm for meniscal repair, 1.96 ± 0.36 mm for meniscal resection, and 1.58 ± 0.20 for control patients (isolated ACLR). Medial meniscal repair showed decreased anterior knee joint laxity compared to medial meniscal resection (P < 0.001). Patients with meniscal repair had higher rates of re‐operation (13.3% vs 0.8% for meniscal resection, P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with ACLR combined with meniscal resection demonstrate better symptoms at 2‐year follow‐up compared to patients with ACLR combined with meniscal repair. ACLR combined with meniscal repair results in decreased anterior knee joint laxity with evidence of improved patient‐reported outcomes in the long term, but also higher re‐operation rates.Level of evidenceIII.