Vencill, Jennifer A.

Objectives: Sexual minority women (SMW) have worse mental and physical health outcomes compared with heterosexual women. Limited research has explored menopause in SMW. This study compared menopause symptoms in cisgender SMW and heterosexual women. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis examined questionnaires from women 40-65 years, seen at women’s health clinics in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota between December 2016 and February 2023. Menopause symptoms were evaluated using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). An MRS score ≥ 12 indicates moderate or greater symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare scores between cisgender SMW and heterosexual women, adjusting for factors that may impact menopause symptoms. Results: Data from 2,273 women were included, with 69 SMW. The mean age was 53.2 (SD: 6.1), body mass index 25.7 kg/m 2 , and a majority were White (91.9%). The median MRS score among all participants was 15 (interquartile range=10, 20); 67.3% reported MRS scores ≥ 12. The likelihood of being on hormone therapy or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors was comparable between groups. In both univariate (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52-1.40) and multivariable (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.47-1.48) analyses, no significant associations between sexual orientation and MRS ≥ 12 were found. Conclusions: Menopause symptoms and likelihood of treatment were similar for cisgender SMW and heterosexual women presenting to tertiary care centers. Limited diversity in the cohort and the small number of SMW reduce the generalizability of the results. The lack of adverse social determinants of health may have contributed to the findings, but additional research in larger cohorts is needed.

Abstract Background Sexual minority women (SMW) have worse mental and physical health outcomes compared to heterosexual women, but literature on sexual function in SMW compared to heterosexual women is lacking. Aim To evaluate sexual function and sexual distress in women across sexual orientations. Method Questionnaire data were analyzed for women aged 18 and older who presented to women’s health clinics at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida from 2016 to 2023. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale–Revised (FSDS-R) scores assessed sexual dysfunction (FSFI ≤ 26.55 and FSDS-R ≥ 11). Multivariable logistic models adjusted for confounding factors. Outcomes Our main outcome was female sexual dysfunction as defined by a composite of FSFI ≤ 26.55 and FSDS-R ≥ 11 to include both sexual function and sexual distress. Results Of 6241 sexually active women, 3% were SMW and 97% were heterosexual women. The majority were White (93%), with average age 51.6 years old. There was no significant difference in sexual dysfunction rates between heterosexual and SMW by combined endpoint on univariate or multivariable analysis. SMW had higher total FSDS scores (17 vs 15, P = 0.037), indicating more sexual distress. Clinical Implications Sexual health concerns may differ between SMW and heterosexual women emphasizing the need for inclusive, culturally competent care. Strengths & Limitations This study assessed the association of sexual orientation and sexual dysfunction by incorporating sexual functioning problems and sexual distress. Limitations include a small number of SMW and a predominantly White, married, employed, and educated study sample, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Conclusion Rates of sexual dysfunction were similar between mostly White SMW and heterosexual women presenting to tertiary care centers. SMW reported more sexual distress than heterosexual women. Evaluating these variables in larger, more diverse cohorts is a critical next step.

Abstract Introduction Sexual therapy for male sexual dysfunction has been used to help patients address a variety of sexual dysfunction-related conditions. While this intervention is frequently recommended for patients by male sexual health experts, the rate of adherence to the recommended therapy and associated factors is unknown. Objective To understand factors leading to completion of sex therapy consultations and barriers that prevent it. Methods A survey was developed by experts in the management of male sexual dysfunction and sex therapy at our institution. The survey included questions focusing on the decision to pursue sex therapy (or not), barriers or facilitating factors, patient perceptions regarding the referral, and treatment success. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify those patients who were referred for sexual therapy after undergoing evaluation for male sexual dysfunction at an academic Men’s Health urology clinic from 2017 - present. The survey was mailed out to these patients, and respondent survey data was compiled to evaluate survey responses. Results To date, 23 patients completed the survey (20% response rate). Sixty-five percent of survey respondents were ≥ 50 years of age, 87% were straight, and 71% were married. Reasons for sex therapy referral were frequently multi-factorial and included erectile dysfunction (65%, n=15), low libido (43%, n=10), ejaculatory dysfunction (39%, n=9), performance anxiety (30%, n=7), relationship problems (30%, n-7), and genital pain (14%, n=3). Seventy-eight percent of patients (n=18) felt that sex therapy consultation was a reasonable part of their treatment plans. Six (26%) patients did not attend their recommended sex therapy consultations. Reported barriers included sense of shame (n=2), embarrassment (n=2), scheduling conflicts (n=1), lack of anticipated benefits (n=1), and feeling dismissed by the referring provider (n=2). Those who attended sex therapy frequently reported the perception that referral made sense based on their symptoms (n=10, 59%) and/or a feeling of desperation to “do anything do get better” (n=11, 65%). Seventy-eight percent of patients who attended sex therapy found it helpful and would recommend it to a friend with a similar concern. Conclusions The majority of male patients who are referred to sexual therapy feel it is beneficial. However, one in four men choose not to pursue this line of treatment despite recommendations from their treating physicians. Future work is needed to address barriers to pursuing sex therapy. Disclosure No

AbstractThis manuscript presents a conceptual model—the Sexual Health and Integrative Pleasure (SHIP) Model—for the clinical assessment and intervention of sexual health concerns. The model was developed by a group of couple/marital family therapy and psychologists who specialize in the treatment of sexual problems. The model consists of five philosophical foundations (systems framework, intersectionality, biopsychosocial model, lifespan approach, and empiricism) and five core therapeutic components (sexual literacy, sexual adaptation and resilience, relational intimacy, pleasure‐oriented positive sexuality, and multidisciplinary care). We define each foundation and component, and compare and contrast the SHIP model with other existing sexual health models. Finally, we demonstrate how the SHIP model was used to provide individual and couple therapy with a cis/heterosexual couple in a university‐based sexual health clinic and make recommendations for additional clinical applications of the model.