Back to Authors

Nishimura, R A

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Clinical Utility of Doppler Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures
Ommen, Steve R. , Nishimura, R A, Appleton, C. P., Miller, Fletcher A., Oh, Jae K. , Redfield, Margaret M. , Tajik, A. Jamil

Circulation | June 12, 2012 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1788-1794

10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1788 Get It

Background —Noninvasive assessment of diastolic filling by Doppler echocardiography provides important information about left ventricular (LV) status in selected subsets of patients. This study was designed to assess whether mitral annular velocities as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging are associated with invasive measures of diastolic LV performance and whether additional information is gained over traditional Doppler variables. Methods and Results —One hundred consecutive patients referred for cardiac catheterization underwent simultaneous Doppler interrogation. Invasive measurements of LV pressures were obtained with micromanometer-tipped catheters, and the mean LV diastolic pressure (M-LVDP) was used as a surrogate for mean left atrial pressure. Doppler signals from the mitral inflow, pulmonary venous inflow, and TDI of the mitral annulus were obtained. Isolated parameters of transmitral flow correlated with M-LVDP only when ejection fraction <50%. The ratio of mitral velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/E′) showed a better correlation with M-LVDP than did other Doppler variables for all levels of systolic function. E/E′ <8 accurately predicted normal M-LVDP, and E/E′ >15 identified increased M-LVDP. Wide variability was present in those with E/E′ of 8 to 15. A subset of those patients with E/E′ 8 to 15 could be further defined by use of other Doppler data. Conclusions —The combination of tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus and mitral inflow velocity curves provides better estimates of LV filling pressures than other methods (pulmonary vein, preload reduction). However, accurate prediction of filling pressures for an individual patient requires a stepwise approach incorporating all available data.
Doppler evaluation of results of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in calcific aortic stenosis.
Nishimura, R A, Holmes, David R. , Reeder, Guy S., Orszulak, Thomas A., Bresnahan, John F., Ilstrup, D M, Tajik, A. Jamil

Circulation | June 17, 2011 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 791-799

10.1161/01.cir.78.4.791 Get It

To evaluate the short-term results of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty, 55 consecutive elderly patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who were at high risk for surgical intervention underwent the procedure, with follow-up by clinical evaluation and Doppler echocardiography. Over a mean follow-up of 6.2 months, there were three early deaths (less than 30 days) and eight late deaths. Nine patients underwent subsequent aortic valve surgery, and four had repeat balloon valvuloplasty. Doppler echocardiography revealed a reduction in aortic valve mean gradient from 48 +/- 18 to 33 +/- 12 mm Hg after the procedure (p less than 0.0001) but a return to 46 +/- 16 mm Hg at follow-up (p less than 0.05). The aortic valve area increased from 0.54 +/- 0.15 to 0.85 +/- 0.23 cm2 after the procedure (p less than 0.0001), but there was a significant decrease to 0.67 +/- 0.19 cm2 at follow-up (p less than 0.05). Of patients free of aortic valve operation or death after 30 days after the procedure, 76% were severely symptomatic before the procedure as compared with 38% at follow-up. In patients undergoing percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty, there is a continued high short-term mortality and a significant incidence of restenosis over short-term follow-up. Nonetheless, a subset of patients do experience sustained clinical improvement from this procedure.
The case for an aggressive surgical approach to papillary muscle rupture following myocardial infarction: “From paradise lost to paradise regained”
Nishimura, R A, GERSH, B J, SCHAFF, H V, GERSH, B J, SCHAFF, H V

Heart | July 27, 2002 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 611-613

10.1136/heart.83.6.611 Get It