Weaver, Kathryn E.

ImportanceReceipt of anthracycline-based chemotherapy and statin therapy have been found to be associated with deterioration of cognitive function in patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo assess the association of statins with attention, verbal fluency, and executive function in patients receiving doxorubicin treatment for cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis secondary analysis of the Preventing Anthracycline Cardiovascular Toxicity With Statins randomized clinical trial, conducted across 31 US community and academic sites from February 5, 2014, through September 24, 2020, involved participants with stage I to IV lymphoma or stage I to III breast cancer undergoing doxorubicin treatment. The data analysis was conducted between August 1, 2024, and April 4, 2025.InterventionsParticipants were randomized (1:1) to receive a daily 40-mg dose of atorvastatin or placebo before initiating doxorubicin treatment and then continued for 24 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAttention, executive function, and verbal fluency were assessed using the Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A) and part B (TMT-B) and the Controlled Oral Word Association test, respectively. Time to complete the assessments were modeled using a linear mixed model, while errors (counts) were modeled using a generalized linear mixed model assuming a Poisson distribution.ResultsA total of 238 participants (mean [SD] age, 49 [12] years; 217 female [91.2%]) were randomized to the statin (n = 118) or placebo (n = 120) groups. Values for TMT-A at 6 and 24 months were similar between the statin group (mean, 32.5 seconds [95% CI, 29.4-35.7 seconds] and 29.8 seconds [95% CI, 26.4-33.2 seconds], respectively) and the placebo group (mean, 28.4 seconds [95% CI, 25.2-31.5 seconds] and 27.8 seconds [95% CI, 24.5-31.0 seconds], respectively). From before treatment to 24 months after treatment, statin recipients had a significant mean improvement of 10.2 seconds for TMT-B (95% CI, 1.9-18.5 seconds), whereas placebo recipients had a nonsignificant improvement of only 0.2 seconds for TMT-B (95% CI, −8.5 to 8.1 seconds). Analysis of the time-by-treatment interaction showed no significant difference between groups. For Controlled Oral Word Association scores in the same period, both the placebo and statin groups showed a mean improvement of 3.62 points (95% CI, 1.71-5.54 points) and 4.74 points (95% CI, 2.69-6.79 points), respectively, with no difference between groups.Conclusions and RelevanceThis secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggests that the receipt of statins during doxorubicin therapy for lymphoma or breast cancer was not associated with worsening cognitive functions over 24 months. Within-group analyses suggested that statins may have contributed to better executive function on the TMT-B.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01988571

PURPOSE Routine collection of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI; collectively SOGI) in cancer clinics advances cancer care equity. METHODS In 2022, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice groups were asked about routine collection of SOGI data in the electronic health record. The proportions of practice groups reporting collection of SO and/or GI data were calculated, and practice group characteristics were assessed for associations. RESULTS Of 271 practice groups nationwide, 42% (n = 112) collect SO data, 58% (n = 157) collect GI data, and 35% (n = 96) collect both. In multivariate analyses, SO data collection was associated with practice groups having minority outreach staff (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.81]; P = .02); GI data collection was associated with practice groups located in the Northeastern United States (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.73 to 5.91]; P = .045), and those with a higher proportion of new patients who were White (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]; P < .001). Practice groups in the South were least likely to collect SOGI data (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.94]; P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in SO and/or GI collection on the basis of the practice group's proportion of Medicaid/Medicare patients, number of new patients with cancer per year, or practice ownership. CONCLUSION Slightly over one third of NCORP practice groups report routinely collecting SOGI data. There are regional differences in data collection, underscoring the need to craft targeted, region-specific interventions focused on boosting the capture and recording of SOGI data in an affirming manner.

6548 Background: National organizations (ASCO, ACS, ACCR) have advocated for routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in cancer clinics to advance cancer health equity. In 2017, only 24% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices collected sexual orientation (SO) data, while 10% collected gender identity (GI) data; recent progress in collection is unknown. Methods: In 2022, NCORP practices again completed a Landscape Assessment to assess research capacity (funding support from 2UG1CA189824) and were asked whether they routinely collect SOGI data in the electronic health record (EHR). The proportions of practices reporting collection of SO and/or GI data and population level differences over time were calculated using Fisher’s exact tests. Univariate associations between SOGI data collection and site-related variables were evaluated using logistic regression; significant associations were then tested in separate multivariate logistic regression models. Results: 271 practices responded to the Landscape Assessment; 42% (114) reported that they routinely collect SO data, 58% (157) reported that they collect GI data; both were significantly higher than 2017 (p<0.001). Compared to other regions, practices in Northeastern states were significantly more likely to report collecting GI, but not SO. Practices with higher proportions of White patients were also more likely to collect GI (p < 0.001). Practices with community outreach staff were more likely to collect SO (Table 1). There were no significant differences in SOGI collection by Medicaid/Medicare patients, new cancer cases per year, or practice ownership. In both 2017 and 2022, sites in Southern states were less likely to collect GI than sites in other regions. Conclusions: Progress was made in SOGI collection between 2017 and 2022, but fewer than half of NCORP sites routinely collect SOGI data, in spite of national guidelines. Further examination of the cultural context of SOGI collection could inform efforts to improve data collection in the South and other regions. The lack of data on sexual and gender minority patients in the EHR contributes to health inequity and deficiencies in patient-centric care. [Table: see text]

Background Sexual and gender minority individuals face numerous cancer‐related inequities, many of which appear to be underreported. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no one has assessed rates of acquisition of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data within community oncology settings. Methods Community oncology practices that were part of the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) network were asked whether they routinely collected SOGI information and coded this information in their electronic medical records. The proportion of practice groups reporting routine collection of sexual and/or gender minority information was calculated. Potential associations between the collection of SOGI information and practice group–level and state‐level characteristics (from Gallup poll data) were also provided. Results Twenty‐four percent of the responding NCORP practice groups reported routine collection of sexual orientation information, and 10% reported collection of gender identity information. Practices located in western regions of the United States, practices in states with higher proportions of sexual and gender minority–identifying individuals, and practices with lower proportions of non‐Hispanic patients were more likely to ask patients about sexual orientation and/or gender identity. Conclusions US oncology practices that participate in research do not frequently collect SOGI information from patients with cancer. Educational initiatives should inform oncology staff and providers about the importance of collecting gender identity and sexual orientation information to improve existent disparities faced by sexual and gender minority patients.