Citations

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common and lethal complication of gastric cancer (GC), occurring in approximately 50% of patients with advanced disease. It is characterized by a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment and limited response to current systemic therapies, resulting in a median survival of only 3–6 months. The objective of this review was to explore the critical role of resident macrophages within the peritoneal immune microenvironment in the development and progression of GC PM and to discuss their potential as therapeutic targets. Peritoneal resident macrophages (PRMs), particularly the GATA6⁺ large peritoneal macrophages (LPMs), are hijacked by GC cells through metabolic reprogramming, transcriptional regulation, and paracrine signaling. These macrophages adopt a protumor M2-like phenotype, promote immunosuppression through T-cell exclusion and Treg recruitment, facilitate cancer cell adhesion and spheroid formation, and contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Emerging therapeutic strategies, including cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), nanoparticle-mediated macrophage repolarization, CSF-1 R/CCR2 axis inhibition, and chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M), show promise in targeting these cells to restore antitumor immunity. In conclusion, resident macrophages are pivotal in shaping the immunosuppressive landscape of GC PM. Targeting these cells represents a promising avenue for novel combination therapies aimed at improving outcomes for patients with GC PM.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important class of cancer treatment. Endocrine immune-related adverse events (E-irAEs) account for a significant proportion of irAEs in ICI-treated patients. Diagnosing E-irAEs accurately and timely can be challenging in the absence of clear categorization and standardization across oncology, endocrinology and other specialties. While existing guidelines provide some broad directions to diagnosis and management, they lack clarity on irAE-specific symptom evaluation and work-up, as well as assessment of severity. These limitations can then impact triage, time-sensitive management and care escalation to specialists such as oncoendocrinologists. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based statements on disease definitions for E-irAEs. A core working group of endocrinologists with expertise in the oncoendocrinology field drafted a survey with statements outlining the general approach to E-irAEs, disease definition and management approach of six specific diagnoses: ir-thyroiditis thyrotoxic phase, ir-thyroiditis hypothyroidism, ir-Graves’ disease, ir-hypophysitis, ir-adrenalitis and ir-type 1 diabetes mellitus. Severity grading tables were drafted for three disease categories—“thyroid”, “pituitary and adrenal”, and “diabetes mellitus”. A two-round modified Delphi process, using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method, was employed. In this process, a 25-member voting panel consisting of endocrinologists, oncologists and other specialists and healthcare providers with experience in management of ICI-treated patients and irAEs was recruited. The panel rated anonymously on usability, accuracy, appropriateness or agreement of 41 items on a 9-point scale in Survey 1, after which a meeting was convened. Statements were modified based on voting results from Survey 1 and Meeting 1, and the process was repeated in Survey 2 and Meeting 2. At the end of this process, consensus was achieved for all statements. Our study findings address the gap in standardized nomenclature, clinical, laboratory and radiological evaluations, and management principles of E-irAEs. With consensus achieved from a panel of experts from a variety of disciplines, we anticipate that the statements can form the basis for standardization of the diagnostic process and improvement of patient care.