Abstract Introduction: Identifying dysregulated gene expression in ovarian cancers has been limited by a deficit of available normal tissues. Here, we generated the largest set of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) tumors with normal precursor tissues for transcriptome analyses to identify lncRNA expression patterns, provide insight into their cellular contexts and functions, and assess their relevance to HGSOC pathogenesis and genetic susceptibility. Methods: We performed RNA sequencing on 220 primary HGSOCs and 116 benign epithelia (micro-dissected fallopian tube, ovarian surface, and inclusion cyst epithelia), and combined samples with 428 HGSOCs from TCGA, 60 HGSOCs from a prior study, and 180 bulk ovary tissues from GTEx. Reads were processed with a uniform bioinformatic and quality control pipeline, combined and batch corrected. Normalized TPM expression values were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test with >2-fold change and FDR <1% considered statistically significant. We computed weighted gene co-expression networks for each tissue type and tested for enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and gene ontologies within co-expression modules. Results: Transcriptomes included 27,700 expressed genes (8,202 lncRNAs) across 706 HGSOCs, 180 bulk ovary, and 88 ovarian epithelia tissues. Most genes were expressed in all tissues, though 5% each showed HGSOC- or normal tissue-specific expression which comprised ≥50% lncRNA. Comparing HGSOCs to normal tissues identified 11,804 DEGs with 4,522 lncRNAs (DElncRNA) of which ~50% were tissue-specific. DEGs included MUC16 and multiple GWAS/TWAS implicated susceptibility genes including RAD51, BRIP1, BNC2, TIPARP-AS1, PRC1, KANSL1, ANKLE1, CHMP4C, ESRP2, and CCNE1. The most highly expressed DElncRNA in HGSOC were upregulated RMRP (P=1.4 × 10−39), SNHG1 (P=3.0 × 10−27), and HAGLR (P=2.0 × 10−24) at the HOXD risk locus. Lower proportions of lncRNA were seen in the HGSOC co-expression modules compared to those in normal tissues and less (3% vs. 15%) HGSOC modules were considered strongly lncRNA regulated (>50% lncRNA in module). Tissue-specific DElncRNA tended toward upregulation in HGSOC compared to ovarian epithelia with enriched modules associated with cell cycle regulation (P=1.5 × 10−38); and toward downregulation in HGSOC compared to bulk ovary with enriched modules associated with chemokine signaling/response (P=1.7 × 10−113). Conclusions: The lower proportion of lncRNA involved in HGSOC co-expression networks indicates a marked loss of regulation by lncRNA. Preliminary interrogation of HGSOC-dysregulated lncRNA expression revealed tissue-specific differences that highlight unique biological pathways in precursor epithelia and the ovarian microenvironment that contribute to HGSOC pathogenesis. Our results provide additional support for previously nominated risk genes. eQTL analysis has recently been completed and integration with GWAS are underway to elucidate lncRNA and lncRNA-regulated susceptibility genes and will be presented at the conference. Citation Format: Brett M. Reid, Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Florian A. Karreth, Peter Kanetsky, Jennifer B. Permuth, Ozlen Saglam, Jamie K. Teer, Xiaoqing Yu, Simon Gayther, Ellen Goode, Paul Pharoah, Thomas A. Sellers, Kate Lawrenson, Jonathan Tyrer. Patterns of lncRNA-regulated gene expression in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Ovarian Cancer; 2023 Oct 5-7; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A004.
Abstract 6065: Patterns of dysregulated coding and noncoding gene expression in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas
Abstract Purpose: Identifying dysregulated gene expression in ovarian cancers has been limited by a deficit of available normal tissues. Here, we generated the largest set of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) tumors with normal precursor tissues for transcriptome analyses. Methods: We performed RNA sequencing on 220 primary HGSOCs and 116 benign epithelia (micro-dissected fallopian tube, ovarian surface, and inclusion cysts), and combined samples with 428 HGSOCs from TCGA, 60 HGSOCs from a prior study, and 180 bulk ovary tissues from GTEx. Raw reads were processed with a uniform bioinformatic and quality control pipeline; combined data were batch corrected. We tested for differences in median normalized CPM expression values using the Wilcoxon rank sum test with >2-fold change and a false discovery rate <1% considered statistically significant. We also conducted weighted gene co-expression network analysis in each tissue type. The hypergeometric test was used for enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and gene ontologies within modules. Results: Transcriptomes comprised 27,700 expressed genes (8,202 lncRNAs) across 706 HGSOCs, 180 bulk ovary, and 88 ovarian epithelia tissues. Most (~90%) genes were expressed in all tissues; 5% each showed HGSOC- or normal tissue-specific expression and ≥50% were lncRNA. Comparing HGSOCs to ovarian epithelia and to bulk ovary identified 11,804 DEGs with 4,522 lncRNAs (DElncRNA) of which ~50% were tissue-specific. DEGs included MUC16 and multiple GWAS/TWAS implicated susceptibility genes including RAD51, BRIP1, BNC2, TIPARP-AS1, PRC1, KANSL1, ANKLE1, CHMP4C, ESRP2, and CCNE1. The most highly expressed DElncRNA in HGSOC were upregulated RMRP (P=1.4x10-39), SNHG1 (P=3.0x10-27), and HAGLR (P=2.0x10-24) at the HOXD risk locus. The highest expressed DElncRNA in precursor tissues was the HGSOC-downregulated MEG3 (P=1.7x10-67). DEGs were enriched in HGSOC co-expression modules associated with immune response, cell motility/localization, cell cycle regulation, angiogenesis, reproductive development, transcriptional regulation, and metabolic processes. Tissue-specific DElncRNA tended toward upregulation compared to ovarian epithelia with enriched modules associated with cell cycle regulation (hub=BUB1B; top DElncRNA TRPM2-AS, P=1.5x10-38); and toward downregulation compared to bulk ovary with enriched modules associated with chemokine signaling/response (hub= GADD45B, top DElncRNA RP11-87P3.1, P=1.7x10-113). Conclusion: HGSOC-dysregulated lncRNA expression revealed tissue-specific differences that highlight unique biological pathways in precursor epithelia and the ovarian microenvironment that contribute to HGSOC pathogenesis. Our results provide additional evidence to support previously nominated risk genes. Integration with eQTL and GWAS are underway to further elucidate novel HGSOC susceptibility genes. Citation Format: Brett M. Reid, Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Florian A. Karreth, Peter Kanetsky, Jennifer B. Permuth, Ozlen Saglam, Jamie Teer, Xiaoqing Yu, Simon Gayther, Ellen Goode, Paul Pharoah, Thomas A. Sellers, Kate Lawrenson. Patterns of dysregulated coding and noncoding gene expression in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6065.
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
1
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers
Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.
Genome-wide Analysis of Common Copy Number Variation and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
AbstractBackground:Germline DNA copy number variation (CNV) is a ubiquitous source of genetic variation and remains largely unexplored in association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk.Methods:CNV was quantified in the DNA of approximately 3,500 cases and controls genotyped with the Illumina 610k and HumanOmni2.5M arrays. We performed a genome-wide association study of common (>1%) CNV regions (CNVRs) with EOC and high-grade serous (HGSOC) risk and, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), performed in silico analyses of tumor-gene expression.Results:Three CNVRs were associated (P < 0.01) with EOC risk: two large (∼100 kb) regions within the 610k set and one small (<5 kb) region with the higher resolution 2.5M data. Large CNVRs included a duplication at LILRA6 (OR = 2.57; P = 0.001) and a deletion at CYP2A7 (OR = 1.90; P = 0.007) that were strongly associated with HGSOC risk (OR = 3.02; P = 8.98 × 10−5). Somatic CYP2A7 alterations correlated with EGLN2 expression in tumors (P = 2.94 × 10−47). An intronic ERBB4/HER4 deletion was associated with reduced EOC risk (OR = 0.33; P = 9.5 × 10−2), and somatic deletions correlated with ERBB4 downregulation (P = 7.05 × 10−5). Five CNVRs were associated with HGSOC, including two reduced-risk deletions: one at 1p36.33 (OR = 0.28; P = 0.001) that correlated with lower CDKIIA expression in TCGA tumors (P = 2.7 × 10−7), and another at 8p21.2 (OR = 0.52; P = 0.002) that was present somatically where it correlated with lower GNRH1 expression (P = 5.9 × 10−5).Conclusions:Though CNV appears to not contribute largely to EOC susceptibility, a number of low-to-common frequency variants may influence the risk of EOC and tumor-gene expression.Impact:Further research on CNV and EOC susceptibility is warranted, particularly with CNVs estimated from high-density arrays.
Integration of Population-Level Genotype Data with Functional Annotation Reveals Over-Representation of Long Noncoding RNAs at Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Loci
Background The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. Methods We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. Results For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10−5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10−8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. Conclusions This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility: results from a large-scale collaboration
ABSTRACTEpithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome‐wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT‐related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive‐cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P‐value <0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2 were considered statistically significant. In the larger dataset, GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 was associated with the endometrioid subtype among Caucasians (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.25, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.19), whereas F8 rs7053448 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), F8 rs7058826 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), and CAPN13 rs1983383 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.90, P = 0.0005, FDR = 0.12) were associated with combined invasive EOC among Asians. In silico functional analyses revealed that GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 coincided with DNA regulatory elements. These results suggest that EMT gene variants do not appear to play a significant role in the susceptibility to EOC.
Abstract 4635: Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility
Abstract Background: Recent bioinformatic analyses and high-throughput sequencing efforts have revealed that RNA editing is a widespread post-transcriptional modification that affects non-coding repetitive elements throughout the genome. This modification, which involves the conversion of adenosine into inosine, is mediated by the action of the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on reports of dysfunctional ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five ADAR genes (ADAD1, ADAR1, ADAR2, ADAR3, SND1) may contribute to EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering the expression of corresponding genes in ovarian tissues. Methods: Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 healthy controls of European ancestry represented in the international Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study, we evaluated the frequency of 7,133 SNPs in 5 RNA editing genes. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between genotypes and case status under a log-additive genetic model, with adjustment for the first five principal components representing European ancestry. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the four main histologic sub-types of EOC. We also aggregated SNP-level data and conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for the combined effect of common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Results: Association analysis revealed a top risk-associated SNP (OR (95% CI) = 1.39 (1.17-1.64)) in ADAR3 with P = 1.3 x10−4, 17 additional SNPs in ADAR1, ADAR3, or SND1 with P = 10−4, and 51 SNPs with P = 10−3; this observed number of statistically-significant SNPs was greater than expected. When restricting to the 6,500 invasive serous adenocarcinomas, the magnitude of association strengthened for numerous SNPs. Exploratory analysis for the less common histologic subtypes (endometrioid (n = 1,439), mucinous (n = 696), and clear cell (n = 660)) revealed SNP-level associations (P<10−3) unique to each sub-type. Gene-level analyses based on AML and SKAT-CR revealed that ADAR1 was globally associated (P<0.10) with susceptibility to invasive EOC, with P = 0.024 and P = 0.023, respectively. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis is underway to evaluate associations between genotype and gene expression in EOC and precursor tissues using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project and other sources. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this large-scale collaboration suggest that germline variation involving RNA editing genes may influence susceptibility to EOC. This novel finding warrants further investigation, as inherited and acquired alterations affecting RNA editing may serve as important biological mechanisms that promote the development of EOC and possibly other malignancies. Citation Format: Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Brett M. Reid, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen Goode, Edwin Iversen, Leigh Pearce, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4635. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4635