Citations

Abstract Introduction: T-PLL is a rare, aggressive leukemia with poor prognosis and limited therapies. Previous studies on T-PLL patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are limited by small numbers with limited data on disease and transplant characteristics. Further, recent data from our large national cohort of patients demonstrated significant survival difference between TCL1A+ and TCL1A- T-PLL, and CD8+ T-PLL vs CD8- T-PLL. In this large multi-center series, utilizing comprehensive disease subtype and alloSCT clinical data, we evaluated prognostic and survival therapeutic outcomes in T-PLL patients that had an alloSCT with a particular focus on T-PLL disease subtypes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 572 diagnosed with T-PLL at 21 academic cancer centers throughout the USA between 2000-2023, of which we performed a further evaluation on the169 that proceeded with alloSCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among n=169 alloSCT recipients with T-PLL, the median follow-up time was 20.9 months post-alloSCT (range: 0.2-182.9), the median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 35-77) and 52% were male. In evaluated patients (n=109), TCL1A was positive by cytogenetics or FISH in 69%. As our recent analysis demonstrated significant differences in survival among specific subtypes of T-PLL, we evaluated outcomes in patients with CD4+CD8- T-PLL (n=90, 53%), CD4-CD8+ (n=17, 10%) T-PLL, and CD4+CD8+ T-PLL (n=52, 31%). 53% (87/164) had known nodal involvement at diagnosis identified by PET or CT scan and 45% (43/96) of known patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant [defined as <5% T-PLL in marrow by flow, or +cytogenetics (e.g. TCL1A)] prior to alloSCT. At the time of alloSCT, 136 (80%) patients were in CR and 23 (14%) patients were in PR. Forty-nine (30%) had a myeloablative (MAC)conditioning regimen and 114 (70%) had a reduced intensity chemotherapy (RIC) conditioning regimen. Eighty (49%) patients had TBI as part of their regimen. The most common regimens were fludarabine (flu)/melphalan based regimens (n=44; 26.0%), flu/cyclophosphamide (cy) based regimens (n=33; 19.5%), flu/busulfan based regimens (n=22; 13.0%), flu/total body irradiation (TBI) (n=8; 4.7%), and cy/TBI (n=4; 2.4%). Across the whole cohort, the median OS and PFS post-alloSCT was 32.6 months (95% CI: 21.0-41.9) and 20.8 months (95% CI: 14.4-30.5) months while the 1-year cumulative incidences (CI) of NRM and relapse were 17% and 20%, respectively. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD and cGVHD were 19% and 23%. There was no difference between patients with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (n=49, 29%) when compared to patients that received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) (n=114, 67%) in OS (33.1 vs 29.2; p=0.68) and PFS (20.2 vs 20.8; p=0.97). Patients that were MRD+ (n=31) had worse OS (22.2 vs 48.6; p=0.1) and PFS (14.1 vs 32.5; p=0.04) and higher rates of relapse (1-year relapse 20% vs 8%; p=0.08) than patients that were MRD- (n=50). PFS was improved in those who received alloSCT though only trended towards significance due to low numbers (HR 0.76, p=0.09). In subtype analysis, TCL1A+ T-PLL had significantly worse outcomes compared to TCL1A negative T-PLL. TCL1A+ disease had significantly worse OS (21.6 vs 63.1; p=0.01) and PFS (12.4 vs 50.7; p=0.01) compared to TCL1A-. Additionally, in TCL1A+ disease CI of NRM (24% vs 3%; p=0.02) and relapse (25% vs 12%; p=0.86) was higher vs TCL1A- PLL. CD4+CD8-, CD4-CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ disease had no difference in survival via either OS (28.0 vs 34.4 vs 21.0; p=0.17) or PFS (29.4 vs 23.5 vs 13.6; p=0.09) as well as no difference 1-year CI of NRM ( 11.6 vs 23.5 vs 26.2; p=0.35) and relapse (18.5 vs 23.5 vs 20.0; p=0.67).Conclusions: AlloSCT significantly improved outcomes for patients with T-PLL compared to those who did not proceed to alloSCT and remains he only curative therapy for those with T-PLL. OS, PFS, and CI relapse were significantly worse for patients with TCL1A+ subtype of T-PLL, or those with MRD positivity or PR prior to alloSCT. Novel strategies to decrease relapse such as post-alloSCT maintenance therapy to improve outcomes are urgently needed in these patients.

Introduction: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (CNS), traditionally referred to as primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), is a rare type of primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites with significantly poorer prognosis than systemic DLBCL. Genetic profiles of PCNSL were widely studied, whereas the tumor microenvironment has not been well characterized. Patients and Methods: A series of molecular analyses were performed using DLBCL FFPE tissues collected by the International Lymphoma Consortium. First, multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) using antibodies for CD20, PAX5, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD45RO, CD68, CD56, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, and CTLA-4 was performed on PCNSL tissues from 121 immunocompetent patients and de novo systemic DLBCL tissues from 405 patients. Digital quantification results for 405 patients with EBV-negative systemic DLBCL or primary testicular (PT) DLBCL have been reported previously. The preliminary mfIHC results of PCNSL will be presented. Second, mfIHC for multiple B cell biomarkers, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, CD163, CD11c, and CD31 were performed for 10 PCNSL validation cases, 24 PT-DLBCL and 451 systemic DLBCL tissues (unpublished). Third, RNA samples were extracted and sequenced for the targeted 1408 cancer-associated genes, successfully in 142 PCNSL cases, including 102 cases evaluated by either of these two mfIHC panels and additional 40 PCNSL cases, Results: First, in the first large mfIHC cohort, PCNSLs compared with de novo systemic nodal or extranodal DLBCL had significantly higher mean/median CD56+ cell densities whereas lower T cell densities (consistent with the immune privilege), as well as lower CD45RO+, PD-1+, and FOXP3+ percentages in T cells whereas higher CD4¯CD8¯ double-negative percentages in T cells. Prognostic analysis in the PCNSL cohort showed that high CD56+ cell densities and high CD45RO+CD8+ T cell densities were associated with significantly poorer and better patient survival, respectively, which are opposite to their prognostic effects in systemic DLBCL as previously reported. Twelve patients had very high PD-L1 expression in B cells and significantly poorer survival in the PCNSL cohort. Second, as validation, the 10 PCNSL cases in the second mfIHC study showed significantly less T cells than systemic DLBCL and PT-DLBCL cases, and low CD8 T cell densities and having low percentage of CD8 T cells adjacent to tumor cells were associated with significantly poorer survival. Immunofluorescence landscapeand spatial analysisrevealed significant differences in immune privilege between PCNSL and PT-DLBCL. Third, gene expression profiling analysis by targeted RNA-seq identified 282 significantly differentially expressed genes between PCNSL and systemic DLBCL, referred to as the PCNSL signature. Unsupervised clustering analysis divided the PCNSL cohort into two clusters, which had no significant difference in MYD88 mutation frequencies analyzed at the mRNA level. Importantly, the cluster with higher expression of many neural glial genes in the PCNSL signature had significantly poorer survival, which remained significant in multivariate analysis adjusting for clinical factors and/or treatments, two PCNSL subcohorts (as training and validation cohorts), and methotrexate-treated patients. NCAM1 (Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1, encoding CD56) was among the upregulated PCNSL signature genes, explaining the poorer prognosis associated with higher CD56+ cell densities in PCNSL by the mfIHC analysis. Summary: Our studies represent the largest immunophenotypic and gene expression profiling studies currently in PCNSL, a rare type of primary DLBCL of immune-privileged sites. Multiplex immunofluorescence revealed the immune landscape in PCNSL in comparison with systemic and testicular DLBCL, and identified prognostic immune biomarkers. Targeted RNA-seq identified a PCNSL gene signature enriched with neuronal-glial genes and showing significant prognostic effect in PCNSL. These novel findings in the PCNSL microenvironment warrant further studies.

Purpose of review There have been major advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, which prompt the updates in the classification of myeloid neoplasms in the fifth edition of World Health Organization Classification (WHO-5) and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these two classification systems for myeloid neoplasms. Recent findings The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many myeloid entities have been refined in WHO-5 and ICC with improved understanding of morphology and integration of new genetic findings. Particularly, molecular and cytogenetic studies have been increasingly incorporated into the classification, risk stratification, and selection of therapy of myeloid neoplasms. Overall, despite some revisions and discrepancies between WHO-5 and ICC, the major categories of myeloid neoplasms remain the same. Further validation studies are warranted to fine-tune and, ideally, integrate these two classifications. Summary Integration of clinical information, laboratory parameters, morphologic features, and cytogenetic and molecular studies is essential for the classification of myeloid neoplasms, as recommended by both WHO-5 and ICC.