Citations

Advanced-stage high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) initially responds to platinum-based chemotherapy; however, most HGSC tumors recur and develop chemotherapy-resistance, making recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) a fatal disease. Ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs), a subpopulation of cells capable of surviving treatment and repopulating tumors, contribute to disease relapse, and understanding the mechanisms(s) responsible for OCSC survival is critical for developing strategies to overcome acquired resistance and prevent tumor recurrence. However, whether platinum-induced OCSC enrichment results from the selection of pre-existing OCSCs or chemotherapy-induced cellular plasticity, and the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes, remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrated that cisplatin treatment not only enriched for OCSCs but promoted the conversion of ALDH- cells to ALDH+ cells, revealing chemotherapy-induced plasticity as a potential mechanism for OCSC expansion. This conversion was associated with nuclear receptor signaling pathways, vitamin D receptor signaling (VDR/RXR) and retinoic acid receptor signaling (RAR/RXR). Importantly, activation of VDR/RXR signaling with vitamin D reduced stemness phenotypes and the cisplatin induced conversion to ALDH+ cells. In addition, vitamin D combined with cisplatin decreased tumor volume in vivo compared to either treatment alone. In contrast, cisplatin treatment increased RAR/RXR signaling, supporting an associative role for ligand-dependent nuclear receptor signaling in OCSC plasticity. Together, these findings reveal that platinum chemotherapy can actively promote the acquisition of stem-like properties and identifies VDR/RXR signaling as a potential regulatory mechanism of OCSC plasticity. Targeting this pathway with vitamin D may provide a therapeutic strategy to target OCSCs and improve responses to platinum-based chemotherapy.

AbstractObjectiveUse of tacrolimus in mild to moderate myasthenia gravis (MG) is generally limited to glucocorticoid‐refractory cases; the advantage of mono‐tacrolimus over mono‐glucocorticoids is unknown.MethodsWe included mild to moderate MG patients treated with mono‐tacrolimus (mono‐TAC) or mono‐glucocorticoids (mono‐GC). The correlation between the immunotherapy options and the treatment efficacy and side effects were examined in 1:1 propensity‐score matching. The main outcome was time to minimal manifestations status or better (MMS or better). Secondary outcomes include time to relapse, the mean changes in Myasthenia Gravis‐specific Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL) scores and the rate of adverse events.ResultsBaseline characteristics showed no difference between matched groups (49 matched pairs). There were no differences in median time to MMS or better between the mono‐TAC group and mono‐GC group (5.1 vs. 2.8 months: unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46–1.16; p = 0.180), as well as in median time to relapse (data unavailable for the mono‐TAC group since 44 of 49 [89.8%] participants remained in MMS or better; 39.7 months in mono‐GC group: unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.23–1.97; p = 0.464). Changes in MG‐ADL scores between the two groups were similar (mean differences, 0.3; 95% CI, −0.4 to 1.0; p = 0.462). The rate of adverse events was lower in the mono‐TAC group compared to the mono‐GC group (24.5% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.002).InterpretationMono‐tacrolimus performs superior tolerability with non‐inferior efficacy compared to mono‐glucocorticoids in mild to moderate myasthenia gravis patients who refuse or have a contraindication to glucocorticoids.