Citations

Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 80% to 90% of estrogen receptor α–positive (ER+) breast cancers. Accumulated evidence has shown that AR is a tumor suppressor and that its expression is associated with improved prognosis in ER+ breast cancer. However, both a selective AR agonist (RAD140) and an AR inhibitor (enzalutamide, ENZ) have shown a therapeutic effect on ER+ breast cancer, so the potential for clinical application of AR-targeting therapy for ER+ breast cancer is still in dispute. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of ENZ and RAD140 in vivo and in vitro in AR+/ER+ breast cancer models, characterizing the relationship of AR and ER levels to response to AR-targeting drugs and investigating the alterations of global gene expression and chromatin binding of AR and ERα after ENZ treatment. In the AR-low setting, ENZ directly functioned as an ERα antagonist. Cell growth inhibition by ENZ in breast cancer with low AR expression was independent of AR and instead dependent on ER. In AR-high breast cancer models, AR repressed ERα signaling and ENZ promoted ERα signaling by antagonizing AR. In contrast, RAD140 activated AR signaling and suppressed AR-high tumor growth by deregulating ERα expression and blocking ERα function. Overall, analysis of the dynamic efficacies and outcomes of AR agonist, and antagonist in the presence of different AR and ERα levels reveals regulators of response and supports the clinical investigation of ENZ in selected ER+ tumors with a low AR/ER ratio and AR agonists in tumors with a high AR/ER ratio. Significance: The ratio of androgen receptor to estrogen receptor in breast cancer dictates the response to AR-targeted therapies, providing guidelines for developing AR-directed treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer.

Abstract Understanding the function of non-coding genomic sequence variants represents a challenge for biomedicine. Many diseases are products of gene-by-environment interactions with complex mechanisms. This study addresses these themes by mechanistic characterization of non-coding variants that influence gene expression only after drug or hormone exposure. Using glucocorticoid signaling as a model system, we integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic approaches to unravel mechanisms by which variant function could be revealed by hormones or drugs. Specifically, we identified cis-regulatory elements and 3D interactions underlying ligand-dependent associations between variants and gene expression. One-quarter of the glucocorticoid-modulated variants that we identified had already been associated with clinical phenotypes. However, their affected genes were ‘unmasked’ only after glucocorticoid exposure and often with function relevant to the disease phenotypes. These diseases involved glucocorticoids as risk factors or therapeutic agents and included autoimmunity, metabolic and mood disorders, osteoporosis and cancer. For example, we identified a novel breast cancer risk gene, MAST4, with expression that was repressed by glucocorticoids in cells carrying the risk genotype, repression that correlated with MAST4 expression in breast cancer and treatment outcomes. These observations provide a mechanistic framework for understanding non-coding genetic variant-chemical environment interactions and their role in disease risk and drug response.

Approximately one‐third of patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) exhibited primary abiraterone resistance. To identify alternative treatment for abiraterone nonresponders, we performed drug discovery analyses using the L1000 database using differentially expressed genes identified in tumor biopsies and patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) tumors between abiraterone responders and nonresponders enrolled in PROMOTE trial. This approach identified 3 drugs, including topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitor mitoxantrone, CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, and pan‐CDK inhibitor PHA‐793887. These drugs significantly suppressed the growth of abiraterone‐resistant cell lines and PDX models. Moreover, we identified 11 genes targeted by all 3 drugs that were associated with worse outcomes in both the PROMOTE and Stand Up To Cancer cohorts. This 11‐gene panel might also function as biomarkers to select the 3 alternative therapies for this subgroup of patients with CRPC, warranting further clinical investigation.

Abstract Background: Androgen receptor (AR) is widely expressed in ER+ breast cancers. Accumulated evidence showed that AR is a tumor suppressor in ERα+ breast cancers. Enzalutamide (ENZ), an AR antagonist, blocks AR signalling, and was reported to inhibit estrogen-driven tumor growth as effectively as tamoxifen. Hence, this study was performed to further examine the mechanism of action of ENZ in ERα+ breast cancers. Methods: The AR gene was knocked out using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Four crRNAs targeting AR and trans-activating crRNA were co-transfected to Cas9-positive MCF7 and T47D cells, two ERα+ breast cancer cell lines with relatively low AR levels based on RNA seq. ESR1 knock down was performed using a lentivirus system. MCF7 and T47D cells were infected with the ESR1-shRNA lentivirus and selected by puromycin for 2 weeks. Single clones of knockdown or knockout cells were tested using western blot. MCF7 and T47D cells were collected for RNA-seq and ChIP-seq after treated with DMSO or 10µM ENZ for 6 hours in complete medium. All sequences were aligned to the Human Reference Genome (hg38, UCSC). Differential gene expression was performed using limma package and upstream analysis was done in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. ChIP peaks were called using MACS2 and overlapping was analyzed using ChIPpeakAnno package in R. Tritium labeled ENZ or estradiol were incubated with ERα overnight. The bound radioactivity was measured using a Beckmann LS 6500 liquidscintillation counter. Results: We found the cell growth inhibition effect of ENZ was little impaired by AR gene knock out in MCF7 and T47D cells as was expected. As ENZ has been shown to inhibit estrogen-driven tumor growth, we performed studies to understand the mechanism of ENZ.We performed RNA-seq and identified 193 differential expressed genes (76 up and 117 down) between DMSO and ENZ-treated MCF7 cells (FC>2 or <0.5, FDR<0.05). Upstream analysis showed that ESR1 might be the upstream regulator of those differentially expressed genes and ESR1 signaling was predicted to be inhibited after ENZ treatment (P=1.69×10-10). To examine the alteration of ERα genomic binding, we performed global ERα ChIP-seq and found 39.58% (8,681/21,933) of ERα-bound sites were abolished by ENZ and the binding intensity was significantly decreased upon ENZ treatment in 12,868 shared peaks. Moreover, radiolabled binding assays showed that ENZ displaced estrogen binding to ERα and directly bound to ERα with a KD= 399.60nM. We further observed a reduction of proliferation inhibition of ENZ in ESR1-KD cells compared with control cells. This suggests that ENZ inhibits ER+ cell growth by displacing E2 from ERα binding sites and subsequently diminishes ERα genomic binding and blocks ERα signaling in ER+ cancers. Conclusion: We found that enzalutamide inhibits cell growth not through AR but by antagonizing ERα activity in MCF7 and T47D ER+ cells. These results reveal ER is the main factor affecting enzalutamide efficacy in these two ERα+ breast cancer cell lines. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate AR antagonists in ERα+ breast cancers. Citation Format: Lixuan Wei, Jia Yu, Huanyao Gao, Huan Zhang, Thanh Nguyen, Yayun Gu, Richard M. Weinshilboum, James N. Ingle, Liewei Wang. Estrogen receptor is a target of enzalutamide in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-03.

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) accounts for ~60-70% of all BC cases. CDK4/6i combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for first- and second-line therapy of patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on substantial improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to ET alone. Unfortunately, most patients (pts) develop resistance to CDK4/6i. The mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i resistance have not been fully elucidated. Robust in vivo CDK4/6i resistant animal models from pts with de novo and acquired CDK 4/6i resistance are lacking. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are important preclinical tools in oncology to advance our understanding of cancer biology and to evaluate drug response phenotypes. Unfortunately, the establishment of sustainable PDXs from pts with HR+ BC is much more difficult than from HR-negative BC. In order to obtain clinically relevant models that can be utilized to better understand mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ET and CDK4/6i, we report the development of PDXs from a prospective study in which percutaneous biopsies were obtained from women receiving palbociclib for the treatment of HR+ advanced or MBC (PROMISE; NCT03281902). Methods: PROMISE (Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Tumor Sequencing in Women Receiving Palbociclib for Advanced Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive Breast Cancer) is a prospective trial which enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC who planned to start treatment with palbociclib and letrozole (1st line [FL]) or palbociclib and fulvestrant (2nd line [SL]). For pts enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), serial tumor biopsies were obtained prior to the start of treatment and at disease progression to establish PDXs. Because baseline take rate was low, we amended the protocol to attempt PDX generation after the 2nd cycle (C2) of therapy. Tissues were received within an hour of excision and were orthotopically implanted in the mammary fat pad of 6~8-week-old nonobese diabetic (NOD)/SCID/IL-2g-receptor null (NSG) mice. Tumor growth was defined as tumor volume ≥ 50 mm3. Tumor take rate was defined as percent of patients with development of at least one stably transplantable (passed at least for two generations) xenograft that was pathologically confirmed as BC. Results: Of the 50 pts enrolled at MCR, 37 were FL pts (2 ineligible) and 13 were SL pts (1 ineligible). Fresh tumor samples obtained pre-treatment from 43 eligible pts (32 FL), after C2 from 17 eligible pts (13 FL), and at disease progression from 10 eligible pts (5 FL) were implanted. Tumor growth was seen in at least one mouse from a pre-treatment specimen in 1 (3.1%) FL pt (confirmed BC) and 4 (36.4%) SL pts (2 confirmed BC); from end of C2 specimens in 2 (15.4%) FL pts and 2 (50%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC); and at progression in 1 (20%) FL pt and 2 (40%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC). The take rate from pre-treatment samples among FL pts was 1/32 (3.1%; 95% CI: 0.08-16.2%). Take rates in other groups are pending histological review. Discussion: In pts receiving palbociclib for HR+ MBC, the take rate using a pre-treatment percutaneous biopsy was low (3.1%) in the FL setting. However, higher growth rates were seen in the SL setting. The observation of higher growth rates at the end of C2 and at progression may relate to the activation of G1/S that occurs with withdrawal of palbociclib, and should be further studied. PDX remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of tumor biology and the development of new therapeutics, especially for those models established from pts with palbociclib and ET resistance. Proteogenomic and sequencing studies are ongoing to fully characterize these PDXs. Citation Format: Jia Yu, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Jason P. Sinnwell, Ann M. Moyer, Bo Qin, Yayun Gu, Huan Zhang, Jodi M. Carter, Krishna R. Kalari, Brendan P. McMenomy, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Fergus J. Couch, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard Weinshilboum, Ciara O'Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) before and after cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) treatment: Initial findings from the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-07.

Abstract Background: Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 60%-90% of breast cancers. The role of AR in breast cancer largely depends on estrogen receptor (ER) status and remains controversial. In ER+ cancers, AR expression is associated with improved prognosis. Enzalutamide (ENZ), an AR antagonist, impairs AR signaling, inhibits ER+/AR+ breast cancer cell proliferation and has been shown to mitigate resistance to anti-estrogen therapies. A recent study identified that RAD140, an AR agonist, suppressed the growth of ER+/AR+ breast cancer via stimulating AR signaling, resulting in down regulation of ERα. Both AR agonists and antagonists are effective in treating ER+ breast cancers. Identifying the subgroup of patients who most likely will benefit from an individual drug is important in clinical practice. Here, we sought to characterize the relative AR to ER levels and their relationships to drug response in ER+ breast cancers.Methods: We evaluated AR and ER expression levels among 68 samples with ER+ breast cancers. On each tumor, IHC staining for AR and ER were performed and results were scored by multiplying the percentage of positive cells by the intensity. TCGA-RPPA (reverse phase protein array) dataset was used to verify AR protein distribution in ER+ cancers. We created MCF7 and T47D cells with doxycycline-inducible AR and ER expression system to manipulate the relative AR to ER ratios and determined the antitumor activity of ENZ and RAD140 by cell proliferation assays. The levels of AR and ER in cells were measured by western blot. Linear regression was used to test the association between dose-response area under curve (AUC) and AR, ER levels. Drug preference was modeled against AR/ER expression levels (AR/ER ratios) using logistic regression.Results: Among 68 ER+ breast cancers, 69.12% were AR-positive. More than 2/3 cases (48 of 68) had more ER than AR expressed. The AR to ER ratios varied from 0 to 6. In the TCGA cohort, 84.15% of 347 ER+ patients had AR/ER ratios less than 1.The range of AR to ER ratios in TCGA dataset were comparable with our data (0.004 to 4.210). In our cell line models, the AR/ER ratios were controlled between 0.19 to 4.05. We found that the AUC of RAD140 was negatively associated with AR protein levels (P=0.008) and AR/ER ratios (P=0.013), and not significantly associated with ER expression levels. On the other hand, the AUC of ENZ was significantly negatively associated with ER protein (P=0.0016) but postiviely associated with AR/ER ratio (p=0.037). Preferred treatment comparing efficacy of the two drug can be best determined at extremes of AR/ER ratios. Using clinically relevant dosages, our model predicted that ENZ (10µM) would be a preferred treatment choice and have a better treatment efficacy compared with RAD140 when the AR/ER ratio was ≤ 0.42, whereas RAD140 (1µM) would be the preferred choice with a better treatment efficacy compared with ENZ when AR/ER ratios were ≥ 3.1 The efficacy preference of the two drugs are equivocal for AR/ER ratios between 0.42 and 3.10. Conclusion: We developed preclinical models using AR and ER expression levels to predict AR-targeting drug response. The results support the use of RAD140 in AR high patients and those with an AR/ER ratio >3.10, and enzalutamide in AR low patients and those with an AR/ER ratio <0.42. Equipoise on choice of drug was found for AR/ER ratios of 0.42-3.10. RAD140 and enzalutamide are compelling candidates for monotherapy or combination with anti-estrogen therapies in ER+/AR+ breast cancer. Future clinical validation of the models and therapeutic effect is warranted. Citation Format: Lixuan Wei, Huanyao Gao, Jia Yu, Duan Liu, Huan Zhang, Thanh Nguyen, Marie R Passow, Jodi M Carter, Richard M Weinshilboum, James N Ingle, Liewei Wang. Computational modeling of androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to AR agonists and antagonists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-36.