Citations

Background: Home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in patients at high risk for readmission. It remains unclear whether this finding is due to the telemetry itself or the nurse contact that follows detection of an abnormal parameter. Purpose: This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior trial comparing patients on home telemetry for 30 days to usual care after discharge to determine if nurse contact affected readmission rates. Methods: Patients randomized to telemetry who had at least 1 nurse contact were compared to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions. Results: Of 449 home telemetry patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more nurse contacts. Single and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of contact with 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of nurse contact with readmission (all unadjusted P ≥ .13, all adjusted P ≥ .18). Conclusion: Our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in patients on home telemetry.

Introduction: This study evaluated patient preference of physician attire both before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic began. The primary outcome was patient preference of physician attire in 2017 compared to 2022 survey cohorts. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study performed at a single-site academic institution in the United States using patient survey materials. In total, 339 patients were included in the study, 161 from 2017 and 178 from 2022. Key Points: There was a statistically significant decrease in patient preference for formal attire in the clinical settings of primary care, hospital, and overall. Male patient preference for formal attire declined in primary care, emergency room, and overall; whereas female patient preference for formal attire declined in the hospital setting. For all genders, the odds ratio was statistically significantly lower in the settings of primary care clinic, hospital, and overall clinical settings. Conclusions: Patient preference for physicians wearing formal attire has decreased significantly since the COVID-19 global pandemic began.

Abstract Background: Home telemonitoring has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions patients at high risk for return to the hospital. The reason for this remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the association of nurse contact with 30-day hospital readmission in these high risk patients. Methods: This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior randomized control comparing home telemonitoring for readmission for 30 days to usual care at discharge. Patients randomized to the home telemonitoring who had vital signs outside a preset range, triggered an alert flag for the monitoring nurse, which generated a contact to the patient. We compared patients who had at least one nurse contact to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions in patients being monitored. Results: Of 449 patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more telemonitoring flags. Single variable and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of flag type with hospital 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of telemonitoring flags with hospital 30-day readmission (all unadjusted P≥0.13, all adjusted P≥0.18). Conclusion: While post-hospitalization home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmission, our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in these patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02136186, registration date May 12, 2014.

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, however, a number of clinical sequela have emerged in patients recovered from COVID-19. Besides the most commonly reported symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, early studies have found that sleep disturbance is also a common complaint. The aim of this study is to survey for sleep disturbance, degree of fatigue and daytime sleepiness in a group of post-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods Patients who were discharged from Mayo Clinic hospitals after COVID-19 hospitalization were recruited in this study. Patients who have an existing diagnosis of sleep apnea or other sleep disorders were excluded from this study. Mayo Clinic patients who never had COVID-19 infection, nor a history of sleep disorders or other sleep disorders were also recruited as controls. Patients completed Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) questionnaires via REDCap. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate the difference between cases and controls in continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the difference in sleep and fatigue scores between cases and controls with baseline characters adjusted. All tests were two-sided with p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 62 patients who completed the questionnaires were included in the analysis. Among them, 33 had COVID-19. Cases were significantly older with higher BMI compared to controls. Global PSQI score (median=10 vs 6, p=0.015), ESS total score (median=8 vs 5, p=0.018) and FSS total score (median=30 vs 22, p=0.009) were all significantly higher for cases compared to control patients. After adjusting for age and BMI, the difference stayed statistically significant. The mean difference between cases vs controls was found to be 2.7 (95%CI:0.2-5.2, p=0.038), 2.93 (95% CI: 0.66-5.2, p=0.014), and 12.62 (95% CI:5.22-20.03, p=0.001) for PSQI, ESS, and FSS scores, respectively. Conclusion Preliminary results showed that sleep disturbance (PSQI) and daytime symptoms (measured by ESS and FSS) are found to be significantly higher among post COVID-19 hospitalized patients compared to controls. Support (If Any) This work is supported by the Mayo Clinic in Florida Department of Medicine Catalyst for Advancing in Academics award and the Mayo Clinic in Florida Research Accelerator for Clinicians Engaged in Research Program.

This review article examines evidence supporting the use of oral therapies in treating idiopathic, actinic, and metabolically induced skin hyperpigmentation. A thorough review of the literature regarding oral treatments for hyperpigmentation was systematically conducted through PubMed. Keywords used in the primary search include “Hyperpigmentation,” “Melanosis” or “Melasma,” “Lightening,” “Oral,” and “Therapeutics.” The search was limited to the English language, and no timeframe restrictions were implemented. Numerous orally administered therapies have been proposed for the treatment of skin hyperpigmentation. There is an abundant body of literature demonstrating the efficacy of orally administered tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. It is reasonable to expect that the most effective oral therapies will address known underlying causes of hyperpigmentation such as thyroid disease, diabetes, and hormonal imbalance. Improvement due to oral therapy of otherwise unresponsive skin hyperpigmentation or hyperpigmentation of unknown cause is less predictable. This review is limited by the strength of evidence contained within the available studies. Clinical studies investigating the treatments discussed within this article are limited in number, at times lack blinding in the study design, and are based on small sample sizes. Based on existing research, the most promising oral remedies for hyperpigmentation appear to be tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. Additional studies to better establish safety and efficacy are necessary.

Abstract Background Limited data are available on the development of skin cancer and the associated risk factors for non‐White liver transplant (LT) recipients. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of newly diagnosed skin cancer postoperatively and to identify the risk factors for the development of skin cancer in non‐White LT recipients. Methods We conducted an initial retrospective chart review of non‐White LT patients who received a transplant at our center between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013. Results Of the 96 patients in the study cohort, 32% were Black, 17% were Asian, 15% were White Hispanic, and 10% were Black Hispanic. One patient had a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer before transplant. No skin cancers were diagnosed during follow‐up (median, 1.3 years; range, 17 days to 8.6 years). Conclusion Our center’s experience is consistent with the literature and suggests that the incidence of newly diagnosed skin cancer in non‐White liver transplant recipients is low. Longer follow‐up may provide additional insights into the specific risk factors for the posttransplant development of skin cancer.