Citations

Abstract Pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients (Ped/AYA; 0–39 years) with meningiomas are underrepresented in neuro-oncology research, despite meningiomas being the second most common primary brain tumor in this age group. While DNA methylation-based models have advanced classification and prognostication in adults, their utility in younger populations remains uncertain. To address this gap, we aimed to evaluate the performance of current DNA methylation-based classification and recurrence prediction models in Ped/AYA patients with meningiomas and identify age-associated molecular differences. As part of this study, we analyzed 1,568 meningioma samples with DNA methylation and clinical data, including subsets with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. Patients were grouped into Ped/AYA (≤39 years, n = 213) and adult (>39 years, n = 1,355) cohorts. We assessed classifier performance, performed subgroup-specific model retraining, and compared molecular profiles across age groups. Our results showed that molecular classification differed significantly between age groups, with Ped/AYA tumors less frequently belonging to the most aggressive Proliferative Molecular Group. The DNA methylation-based recurrence model performed well in adults (AUC = 0.83) but poorly in the Ped/AYA cohort (AUC = 0.57). However, retraining the model on only younger patients improved performance (AUC = 0.75). In addition, Ped/AYA tumors exhibited significantly fewer chromosomal alterations, including lower frequencies of 1p, 6q, and 14q loss (p<0.05). Taken together, these findings indicate that predominantly adult-trained methylation models underperform in younger meningioma patients due to both biological divergence and exclusion from training datasets. Our findings underscore the need for age-specific molecular tools to improve prognostication and support personalized care across the lifespan in neuro-oncology.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and exhibit clinical heterogeneity. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the only adjuvant therapy, but response is variable and biomarkers are limited. RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 trial to stratify meningioma patients for adjuvant RT based on clinical risk. Here, we apply modern molecular tools to this cohort and uncover correlates of RT response. To do so, tumor tissue from 100 RTOG-0539 patients was profiled using DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Recurrence scores, Molecular Groups, gene expression, and copy number alterations were compared across clinical groups and between RT responders and non-responders. Using this approach, modern grading criteria, including brain invasion, TERT mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion and 1p/1q status, would reclassify 10% of tumors and alter treatment group assignment in 7%. Notably, non-responders to RT had more frequent 1p and 14q loss, and greater copy number burden. In addition, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling revealed immune-related signatures in RT responders and upregulation of cell cycle–related pathways in RT non-responders, several of which overlapped with targets of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor validated in aggressive meningioma models. Of particular importance, the Proliferative Molecular Group was an independent predictor of post-RT recurrence in multivariable analysis, outperforming WHO grade. In conclusion, multi-omic analysis of the RTOG-0539 cohort shows that updated WHO grading criteria, incorporating molecular and cytogenetic features, improve risk stratification. However, molecular classification, particularly the Proliferative group, remains an independent and stronger predictor of RT response. These findings support integrating molecular biomarkers alongside modern grading frameworks to guide treatment and trial design in meningioma.