Citations

Aberrant activation of the Hippo–YAP/TAZ–TEAD transcriptional axis is a recurrent feature of multiple solid tumors and contributes to tumor maintenance, lineage plasticity, and therapeutic resistance. Recent medicinal chemistry has shown that TEAD proteins are druggable, but the rate at which in silico screening nominates compounds that prove functionally active in cells remains poorly defined, and negative validation results are rarely reported. Here we describe an experimental assessment of a focused set of computationally nominated candidate compounds, selected from a structure-guided virtual screen of the YAP–TEAD interface across approximately 917,000 library compounds and three predicted binding sites. Candidates were evaluated using long-term (144 hour) CellTiter-Glo proliferation assays in three Hippo-altered malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines (MSTO-211H, NCI-H2052, NCI-H226), with the validated TEAD inhibitor K-975 and cisplatin as positive controls, and an exploratory TEAD-responsive luciferase reporter in MCF7 cells. K-975 produced dose-dependent antiproliferative activity in MSTO-211H and NCI-H2052, with reduced sensitivity in NCI-H226, while cisplatin reduced viability in all lines. In contrast, the computationally nominated compounds, including AG-690/36549045, AN-655/40856217, and additional library members, did not produce measurable antiproliferative activity at the concentrations tested. In the exploratory reporter, apparent suppression of TEAD activity consistently co-occurred with loss of cell viability, a pattern consistent with cytotoxicity rather than selective transcriptional inhibition; no TEAD-active reference compound was co-tested within the reporter panel, and no direct YAP–TEAD biochemical or target-engagement assay was performed. These results describe a case in which computational nomination at the YAP–TEAD interface showed limited concordance with cell-based activity and provide a transparent account of negative findings to inform expectations for early-stage discovery targeting Hippo-dependent transcriptional programs.

3109 Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is an enzyme that catalyzes the removal of poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) chains from proteins during DNA damage repair. PARG inhibition leads to selective cell death in tumors with underlying replication fork defects, including BRCAm tumors, through a mechanism distinct from PARP inhibition. ETX-19477 is an oral, potent, and selective PARG inhibitor that shows robust preclinical activity in mouse models of ovarian, breast, and gastric cancers. Methods: ERADIC8 is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study, consisting of two parts, dose escalation and dose expansion. A Bayesian Optimal Interval Design was used to enroll patients (pts) into dose escalation cohorts, with enrichment for pts with BRCAm high grade serous ovarian (HGSOC) and breast cancers. The primary objective is to assess safety/tolerability of ETX-19477 and define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose(s). Secondary and exploratory objectives include pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity per RECIST v1.1. ETX-19477 is given orally once or twice daily in 21-day cycles. Results: As of Jan 6 2026, 45 pts were enrolled into the study across 11 dose levels (range: 80-750 mg QD, 190-350 mg BID). Tumor types included ovarian (n=24, BRCAm: 18), breast (n=8, BRCAm: 7), endometrial (n=6, BRCAm: 0), colorectal (CRC, n=3, BRCAm: 1), and other (n=4, BRCAm: 0) cancers. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs; any grade) occurring in >20% of pts were nausea (53%), vomiting (38%), and fatigue (24%). The only Gr3 TRAE occurring in >5% of pts was neutropenia (16%). There was one Gr4 TRAE of neutropenia in 1 pt (2%) and no Gr5 TRAEs. ETX-19477 exposure is dose proportional, and the BID regimen achieves >85% PARG inhibition throughout the dosing interval in a blood-based PAR accumulation pharmacodynamic assay. As of the data cutoff, dose escalation is ongoing at 350 mg BID (MTD has not been defined) and dose expansion is ongoing at 200-300 mg BID. Among BRCAm, HGSOC pts enrolled at BID dose levels, there were 7 evaluable pts with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range 2–11): 2 pts achieved a partial response (PR, 29%) and 3 pts achieved stable disease (SD, 43%). Both pts with PRs were platinum-resistant and received prior PARP inhibitor treatment. 1 pt with BRCAm CRC remains on active therapy (250 mg BID) with SD for 7 months. Conclusions: ETX-19477 was well tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with BRCAm, platinum-resistant HGSOC during dose escalation. These findings provide the first clinical proof-of-concept of PARG inhibition in HGSOC. ETX-19477 is being further evaluated in the dose expansion phase of the study. Clinical trial information: NCT06395519 .

Advances in oncology drug development are driving the emergence of novel therapies, challenging traditional dose-efficacy assumptions in dose-finding oncology trials. Traditional trial designs aim to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by assessing patients’ dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) – adopting traditional dose-efficacy paradigms that efficacy increases with treatment dose. With these new therapies in mind, emphasis should shift toward methodological advancements in trial designs aimed at identifying optimal doses, rather than solely determining MTDs. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) within dose-finding oncology trials is increasingly recommended to better understand treatments’ tolerability profiles, especially given the extended tolerability assessment windows for novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies. This article introduces PRO-ADD ( P atient- R eported O utcomes A ided D ose-optimisation D esign), a modular trial design framework for dose-optimisation. We leverage this framework to optimise dosage with respect to three key outcomes – clinician-assessed DLTs, PROs and preliminary efficacy. PRO-ADD performs well at identifying the optimal dose (both efficacious and tolerable) – successfully identifying the most tolerable effective dose and avoiding escalation to larger, safe doses offering no additional efficacy benefit. As the field evolves, patient-centric dose-finding approaches incorporating PROs are crucial in advancing our understanding of treatment tolerability, and in turn, shaping the future landscape of dose-finding oncology trials.

Abstract Background: Zedoresertib (zedo) and lunresertib (lunre) are oral, highly selective WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors, respectively. Inhibition of these targets leads to premature mitotic entry, and in the presence of high replication stress causes mitotic catastrophe. In preclinical models, the combination of the zedo and lunre is synthetically lethal, supporting this first-in-class trial combination (NCT04855656). Methods: In this Phase 1 trial, patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with CCNE1 amplification (amp), or FBXW7 or PPP2R1A deleterious mutations (mut) were treated with zedo (daily dosing) plus lunre (3 days on/4 days off), guided by preclinical modelling of the pharmacological contributions of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition in achieving tumor regression. Objectives included safety, tolerability, recommended doses (RD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PDy), antitumor activity and molecular response rate (MRR; ≥50% decline in circulating tumor DNA). Results: As of 18 Nov 2025, 54 pts (55.6% female ; prior lines of therapy 1 - 9, main cancer types: ovarian (OC) (35.2%), colorectal (31.5%), pancreatic (7.4%) and breast (5.6%)) were treated at 5 dose levels (DL) from 150 mg to 260 mg of zedo plus 60 mg or 80 mg of lunre. The most common ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (9.3%), neutropenia (7.4%) and Palmar Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (7.4%). There were no G5 TRAEs. 4 (9.3%) of 54 pts had a dose-limiting toxicity (G3 pain in extremity and G1 rash in same pt (zedo 150 mg / lunre 60 mg), G3 rash (200 mg / 80 mg), G3 PPE (260 mg / 60 mg), G3 vomiting (260 mg / 60 mg)). PK/PDy analyses showed dose-dependent exposures for both zedo and lunre and target engagement in most pts, with reductions in pCDK1 Thr14 and Tyr15 and yH2AX induction. 24 (55.5%) of 44 RECIST v1.1 evaluable pts showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 5 uPR, 15 SD and 1 PD). Of 16 evaluable pts with advanced OC (12 platinum resistant , 2 unknown and 2 platinum sensitive) with CCNE1 amp (13 pts) or FBXW7 mut (3 pts), 13 (81.3%) showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 3 uPR and 7 SD); clinical benefit rate (pts with CR, PR or SD) was 93.8%; 7 (43.8%) OC pts were on treatment for at least 16 weeks; 4 (25%) OC pts achieved GCIG CA-125 responses. Of 23 pts with a post baseline ctDNA analysis, a MRR of 39% was seen across all DLs. Conclusion: We report the first disclosure of clinical data of the first-in-field synthetic lethal combination of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors in a molecularly defined pt population. The safety profile of zedo and lunre was expected and manageable. Promising antitumor activity was observed in pts with CCNE1 amp or FBXW7 mut solid tumors, especially pts with OC. Further dose optimization of this combination is ongoing. Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Rahul Aggarwal, Elisa Fontana, Martin Hojgaard, Benedito A. Carneiro, Linda Duska, Patricia LoRusso, Siddhartha Yadav, Stephanie Lheureux, Cara Mathews, Ryan H. Moy, Nehal Lakhani, Mia Weiss, Joan Tymon-Rosario, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Elisabeth K. Lee, Esteban Rodrigo Imedio, Jonathan Wessen, Luke Piggott, Vito Dozio, Noemie Luong, Christophe Mas, Alison M. Schram. First data disclosure of the Phase I trial of the first in class combination of WEE1 inhibitor zedoresertib with PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring CCNE1, FBXW7, or PPP2R1A genomic alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT022.

Background: Sharing of family cancer history (FCH) in Black families has been documented as lower than in other populations. There has been limited exploration as to the factors and circumstances that facilitate or hinder FCH communication in these communities. Objective: To explore intersecting factors influencing FCH discussion in Black families with a breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis. Interventions/Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with socioeconomically diverse breast and ovarian cancer patients or family members. Interviews were thematically analyzed for iterative themes on FCH. Results: A total of 107 participants completed an interview. Discussion of FCH was reported as being influenced by several factors, including relationship and family dynamics, personality of family members, involvement in caregiving and support, and perceived importance and responsibility of communicating FCH for cancer prevention. Participants also described how inequitable access to medical care influenced disclosure of a cancer diagnosis, and socioeconomic concerns can influence family communication and documentation of FCH in the medical record. Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that disclosure of FCH is improving over time as access to healthcare has increased for Black families. Implications for Oncology Nursing Practice: Strategies to collect FCH outside of clinic settings, such as digital tools or chatbots, should be considered for increased capture of cancer pedigrees in families where discussion is limited. Patient education on options for preventative care and communications tools may assist patients with family discussions, although patients with adverse social determinants of health are likely to experience additional barriers to genetic screening based on FCH alone.

ABSTRACT Introduction Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among Latinas. Although breast cancer risk assessment models exist and show promise in reducing mortality, few studies have elicited women's interest in and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment, particularly among underserved populations, like Latinas, who are susceptible to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. These disparities stem from factors such as limited access to healthcare services, lower rates of screening utilization, language barriers, and socioeconomic challenges, all of which compound their risk and hinder effective engagement with risk assessment tools. This qualitative study aims to explore Latinas' perspectives regarding breast cancer risk assessment and implications on future behaviors. Methods Twenty‐three under‐ or uninsured Latinas aged 45–65 with no personal history of breast cancer took part in either a focus group ( n = 3, 15 participants) or individual interviews (8 participants). Guided by health behavior theories (Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model), data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using a deductive‐inductive approach to thematic content analysis, resulting in four themes. Results Latinas expressed high interest in knowing their breast cancer risk and reported that the benefits of knowing one's risk outweighed the harms. Latinas also stated that they would continue screening as recommended if found to be at low risk, but that they would speak with their provider or increase screening frequency if found to be at increased risk. Moreover, Latinas described the pivotal role of providers and social networks in influencing interest and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment and preventive behaviors. Conclusion Underserved Latinas viewed breast cancer risk assessment positively and underscored the need for multilevel, culturally tailored strategies to improve breast cancer risk assessment. This study yielded four distinct themes: (1) Interest and Awareness of Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (2) Benefits and Barriers of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (3) Screening Implications of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, and (4) Provider Influence on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Behaviors. Potential strategies include efforts to improve provider engagement and communication and leveraging social networks to increase awareness and encourage preventive behaviors. Trial Registration NCI‐2023‐00465

ABSTRACT The limited efficacy of current therapies against cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) necessitates the development of novel treatment strategies. Src family kinases (SFKs) contribute significantly to tumor progression and resistance in CCA. Therefore, we investigated the novel, first-in-class SFK ‘OFF’ inhibitor NXP900 in diverse preclinical CCA models, including those with acquired resistance. This study evaluated the therapeutic effects of NXP900 and detailed adaptive molecular responses to SFK inhibitor therapy. We also aimed to identify biomarkers predictive of drug sensitivity using integrated multiomic profiling and develop strategies to overcome resistance. NXP900 inhibited YAP activity through direct inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation and indirect activation of the Hippo pathway via LATS. These effects were associated with decreased tumor cell viability in CCA cell lines and several in vivo models. Notably, IDH -mutant patient-derived xenograft CCA models were particularly sensitive to NXP900. NXP900 also synergized with gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, enhancing antitumor efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo models. Multiomic analyses combining transcriptomics, global proteomics, and phosphoproteomics identified molecular features associated with primary response and acquired resistance. IL13RA-AKT signaling was upregulated in resistant models; NXP900 sensitivity could be restored with AKT or IL13RA2 inhibition. Together, these findings demonstrate the therapeutic potential of NXP900 as a novel YAP inhibitor in CCA and support further investigation in a clinical trial. Graphical Abstract

PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.

The mammalian lung operates under a biological paradox, requiring architectural fragility for gas exchange while maintaining robust regenerative plasticity to withstand injury. The Hippo signaling pathway has emerged as a central “rheostat” in orchestrating these opposing needs, yet the distinct roles of its downstream effectors remain underappreciated. This review synthesizes recent genetic and mechanobiological advances to propose a “Tale of Two Effectors” model, arguing for the functional non-redundancy of YAP and TAZ. We posit that YAP functions to drive airway progenitor expansion, mechanical force generation, and maladaptive remodeling. Conversely, TAZ—regulated uniquely via transcriptional mechanisms and mechanotransduction—acts as an obligate driver of alveolar differentiation and adaptive repair through an NKX2-1 feed-forward loop. Furthermore, we introduce the “See-Saw” model of tissue fitness, where mesenchymal niche collapse releases the mechanical brake on the epithelium, triggering the bronchiolization characteristic of pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, we extend this framework to malignancy, illustrating how Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) subtypes mirror these developmental and regenerative states. This integrated framework offers new therapeutic distinct targets for modulating tissue fitness and resolving fibrosis.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Grayson's presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) technique on nasal and alveolar morphology in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting : Multicenter international literature across clinical and academic institutions. Patients, Participants Infants with UCLP reported in 21 eligible studies (n = 534), of whom 368 received PNAM. Interventions Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) according to the Grayson protocol. Main Outcome Measure(s) : Changes in nasal symmetry (nostril width ratio, columellar angle) and alveolar morphology (alveolar gap dimensions, intertuberosity distance). Results PNAM was performed for an average duration of 96 days with 11 adjustments per patient. Pooled analyses demonstrated significant improvements in nasal symmetry: nostril width ratio decreased from 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7–3.1; I² = 98%) to 1.8 (95% CI, 0.9–2.6; I² = 97%), and the columellar angle increased from 52° (95% CI, 42.0–62.8; I² = 100%) to 70° (95% CI, 59.1–80.6; I² = 98%). Alveolar gap narrowed from 10.7 mm (95% CI, 9.5–11.9; I² = 92%) to 3.9 mm (95% CI, 3.1–4.8; I² = 93%). Intertuberosity distance increased slightly, from 31.3 mm (95% CI, 29.3–33.3; I² = 95%) to 31.8 mm (95% CI, 28.9–34.8; I² = 98%). Conclusions Grayson's PNAM appears to improve nasal and alveolar morphology in infants with UCLP prior to definitive surgery. Standardized outcome measures and long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine clinical protocols.