Citations

Background This review evaluates the current evidence for the role of venoactive drugs (VADs) for venous origin chronic pelvic pain (VO-CPP) and provide insights to inform the design of an ideal randomized controlled trial (RCT) for future research. Methods A search was performed in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility using Covidence software following PRISMA reviews’ methodology. The quality of RCTs and cross-over RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane review tools. Studies were reviewed by 3 physicians, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. A narrative review of the studies was conducted to identify and synthesize clinical outcomes and safety profile of VADs. Results Eleven studies (n = 748) were identified: 3 RCTs and 8 open-label prospective studies. Most participants were reproductive-age women with confirmed VO-CPP, diagnosed via imaging or laparoscopy. Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (MPFF) was the most studied VAD. Pain assessment with VAS scores was the primary endpoint in all studies, with significant benefit in patients consistently demonstrated. Other endpoints included Pelvic Venous Clinical Severity Score (PVCSS) and Pelvic Varicose Vein Questionnaire (PVVQ), with improved symptoms and quality of life. Quantitative outcomes were also reported (reduced pelvic vein diameter; better venous hemodynamics). MPFF was safe, with few adverse events reported. Three RCTs had methodological limitations, with two judged high-risk for bias. Conclusions While many identified studies appear to be of low quality, the consistent beneficial effect on VO-CPP scores and the safety profile observed across all reviewed studies suggest that flavonoids have a positive role in the conservative management of pelvic venous disease (PeVD). Future well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. In the meantime, flavonoids should be considered a therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with PeVD who are not qualified for, not wishing, or are awaiting intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used to risk-stratify pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Rising PCL incidence and developments in tissue acquisition and specimen analysis necessitate updated appraisal of EUS-FNA safety, particularly the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis, the most common EUS-FNA-related adverse event. Our systematic review aims to accurately quantify the risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis to best inform decisions regarding EUS-FNA's optimal role in PCL workup. METHODS: We performed systematic searches in 4 databases from inception to April 2024 for original English-language studies investigating EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis. We extracted data on demographics and EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk, severity, and risk factors. These were meta-analyzed through the DerSimonian Laird Method using a random-effects model. Meta-regression of pancreatitis risk was performed to delineate associations with clinical and procedural characteristics. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies comprised 8,086 patients and reported 110 EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis events. Pooled risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis was 1.4% (95% confidence intervals, −0.8% to 3.5%; I 2 = 0.00), which was predominantly of mild severity (67%) and uniformly nonfatal. Pancreatitis risk lacked significant association with sample size, age, sex, cyst size, needle caliber, or passes, although we noted trends toward higher risk in studies published after 2015, those using higher gauge needles (19 G vs 22 G/25 G), and those performing EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy. DISCUSSION: We note with high certainty that pancreatitis after EUS-FNA of PCLs is infrequent and mild in severity with no mortality in the included cohort. EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy may serve as a significant risk factor for EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk; however, further studies are needed to delineate other predisposing characteristics.

Objective To examine the impact of increased body mass index (BMI) on (1) tracheotomy timing and (2) short‐term surgical complications requiring a return to the operating room and 30‐day mortality utilizing data from the Multi‐Institutional Study on Tracheotomy (MIST). Methods A retrospective analysis of patients from the MIST database who underwent surgical or percutaneous tracheotomy between 2013 and 2016 at eight institutions was completed. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of obesity on tracheotomy timing and complications. Results Among the 3369 patients who underwent tracheotomy, 41.0% were obese and 21.6% were morbidly obese. BMI was associated with higher rates of prolonged intubation prior to tracheotomy accounting for comorbidities, indication for tracheotomy, institution, and type of tracheostomy ( p = 0.001). Morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 ) experienced a longer duration of intubation compared with patients with a normal BMI (median days intubated [IQR 25%–75%]: 11.0 days [7–17 days] versus 9.0 days [5–14 days]; p < 0.001) but did not have statistically higher rates of return to the operating room within 30 days ( p = 0.12) or mortality ( p = 0.90) on multivariable analysis. This same finding of prolonged intubation was not seen in overweight, nonobese patients when compared with normal BMI patients (median days intubated [IQR 25%–75%]: 10.0 days [6–15 days] versus 10.0 days [6–15 days]; p = 0.36). Conclusion BMI was associated with increased duration of intubation prior to tracheotomy. Although morbidly obese patients had a longer duration of intubation, there were no differences in return to the operating room or mortality within 30 days. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope , 134:4674–4681, 2024

Background Differences in quality of life (QoL) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well characterized. We aimed to compare the short‐ and long‐term effects of CABG versus PCI on QoL. Methods and Results We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing CABG versus PCI using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)‐Angina Frequency, SAQ‐QoL, SAQ‐Physical Limitations, EuroQoL‐5D, and Short‐Form Questionnaire. We calculated mean changes within each group from baseline to 1, 6, 12, and 36 to 60 months (latest follow‐up) and the weighted mean differences between groups using inverse‐variance methods. A total of 10 760 patients were enrolled in 5 trials. From baseline to 12 months and 36 to 60 months, the mean change in SAQ‐Angina Frequency was >22 points (95% CI, 21.0–25.6) after both PCI and CABG. The mean difference in SAQ‐Angina Frequency was similar between procedures at 1 month and at 36 to 60 months but favored CABG at 12 months (1.97 [95% CI, 0.68–3.26]). SAQ‐QoL favored PCI at 1 month (−2.92 [95% CI, −4.66 to −1.18]) and CABG at 6 (2.50 [95% CI, 1.02–3.97]), 12 (3.30 [95% CI, 1.78–4.82]), and 36 to 60 months (3.17 [95% CI, 0.54 5.80). SAQ‐Physical Limitations (−12.61 [95% CI, −16.16 to −9.06]) and EuroQoL‐5D (−0.07 [95% CI, −0.08 to −0.07) favored PCI at 1 month. Short‐Form Questionnaire‐Physical Component favored CABG at 12 months (1.18 [95% CI, 0.46–1.90]). Conclusions Both PCI and CABG improved long‐term disease‐specific and generic QoL.

ImportanceTracheotomies are frequently performed by nonotolaryngology services. The factors that determine which specialty performs the procedure are not defined in the literature but may be influenced by tracheotomy approach (open vs percutaneous) and other clinicodemographic factors.ObjectiveTo evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics associated with tracheotomies performed by otolaryngologists compared with other specialists and to differentiate those factors from factors associated with use of open vs percutaneous tracheotomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent a tracheotomy for cardiopulmonary failure at 1 of 8 US academic institutions between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to July 2023.ExposureTracheotomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was factors associated with an otolaryngologist performing tracheotomy. The secondary outcome was factors associated with use of the open tracheotomy technique.ResultsA total of 2929 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.2 [17.2] years; 1751 [59.8%] male) who received a tracheotomy for cardiopulmonary failure (652 [22.3%] performed by otolaryngologists and 2277 [77.7%] by another service) were analyzed. Although 1664 of all tracheotomies (56.8%) were performed by an open approach, only 602 open tracheotomies (36.2%) were performed by otolaryngologists. Most tracheotomies performed by otolaryngologists (602 of 652 [92.3%]) used the open technique. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that self-reported Black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.52-2.35), history of neck surgery (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.06-3.57), antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.29-2.36), and morbid obesity (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.24-1.92) were associated with greater odds of an otolaryngologist performing tracheotomy. In contrast, history of neck surgery (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.96-1.92), antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.14), and morbid obesity (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.19) were not associated with undergoing open tracheotomy when performed by any service, and Black race (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.71) was associated with lesser odds of an open approach being used. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 4 was associated with greater odds of both an otolaryngologist performing tracheotomy (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53) and use of the open tracheotomy technique (OR, 1.48, 95% CI, 1.21-1.82).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, otolaryngologists were significantly more likely than other specialists to perform a tracheotomy for patients with history of neck surgery, morbid obesity, and ongoing anticoagulation therapy. These findings suggest that patients undergoing tracheotomy performed by an otolaryngologist are more likely to present with complex and challenging clinical characteristics.

Objective: We aimed to discern clinico-demographic predictors of large (≥8) tracheostomy tube size placement, and, secondarily, to assess the effect of large tracheostomy tube size and other parameters on odds of decannulation before hospital discharge. Summary of Background Data: Factors determining choice of tracheostomy tube size are not well-characterized in the current literature, despite evidence linking large tracheostomy tube size with posttracheotomy tracheal stenosis. The effect of tracheostomy tube size on timing of decannulation is also unknown, an important consideration given reported associations between endotracheal tube size and probability of failed extubation. Methods: We collected information pertaining to patients who underwent tracheotomy at 1 of 10 U.S. health care institutions between 2010 and 2019. Tracheostomy tube size was dichotomized (≥8 and <8). Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to identify predictors of (1) large tracheostomy tube size, and (2) decannulation before hospital discharge. Results: The study included 5307 patients, including 2797 (52.7%) in the large tracheostomy cohort. Patient height (odds ratio [OR] = 1.060 per inch; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.041–1.070) and obesity (1.37; 95% CI 1.1891.579) were associated with greater odds of large tracheostomy tube; otolaryngology performing the tracheotomy was associated with significantly lower odds of large tracheostomy tube (OR = 0.155; 95% CI 0.131–0.184). Large tracheostomy tube size (OR = 1.036; 95% CI 0.885–1.213) did not affect odds of decannulation. Conclusions: Obesity was linked with increased likelihood of large tracheostomy tube size, independent of patient height. Probability of decannulation before hospital discharge is influenced by multiple patient-centric factors, but not by size of tracheostomy tube.