Citations

Background: Regadenoson is a selective A2A receptor agonist that is administered as a fixed dose bolus with rapid onset (∼30 sec), and short duration (∼2-4 min) of action. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) for quantification of coronary flow reserve (CFR) in healthy humans during regadenoson vasodilator stress. Methods: Fifteen subjects [3 males, age: 45.8±5.2 years, BMI 23.8±2.3 kg/m2] with normal LV wall motion and no CAD underwent real-time MCE. Three standard apical LV views were acquired during a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of Definity (1.3 ml in 60 cc 0.9% saline at 200 ml/hr) at rest and during vasodilator stress (regadenoson 400 ug IV bolus). Following transient microbubble destruction, microbubble velocity (β, sec -1 ), myocardial blood volume (A, dB) and myocardial blood flow (MBF, dB/sec) were determined. Videodensitometric quantification using a 16-segment model at end-systole was performed off-line. Results: Quantification of reserve parameters was feasible in all (15/15) patients, 188/240 segments (78%)[82%, 80% and 70% of 4-, 2-, 3-chambers apical views] and 43/45 (95%) coronary territories [one each of Cx and RCA territories were not feasible]. Augmentation from baseline to vasodilator stress was observed for both ß (s -1 ) [0.65± 0.25 vs 0.79± 0.21, P=0.031] and MBF (dB/sec) [2.85± 1.43 vs 4.65± 2.06, P= 0.002], however A (dB) did not change [06.62± 2.57 vs 6.79±2.1, P=0.463]. CFR measurements from all views were similar (Fig 1). There was no significant difference between CFR measured in the 3 coronary territories, although some heterogeneity was noted in the posterior circulation CFR (Fig 2). Conclusion: Real-time MCE during Regadenoson vasodilator stress is feasible, and is a useful technique for the rapid noninvasive quantification of CFR in healthy humans.

Abstract Background and Aims Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the guideline-based indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR), which has markedly increased with transcatheter approaches, suggesting possible increasing AS incidence. However, reported secular trends of AS incidence remain contradictory and lack quantitative Doppler echocardiographic ascertainment. Methods All adults residents in Olmsted County (MN, USA) diagnosed over 20 years (1997–2016) with incident severe AS (first diagnosis) based on quantitatively defined measures (aortic valve area ≤ 1 cm2, aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, peak velocity ≥ 4 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≤ 0.25) were counted to define trends in incidence, presentation, treatment, and outcome. Results Incident severe AS was diagnosed in 1069 community residents. The incidence rate was 52.5 [49.4–55.8] per 100 000 patient-year, slightly higher in males vs. females and was almost unchanged after age and sex adjustment for the US population 53.8 [50.6–57.0] per 100 000 residents/year. Over 20 years, severe AS incidence remained stable (P = .2) but absolute burden of incident cases markedly increased (P = .0004) due to population growth. Incidence trend differed by sex, stable in men (incidence rate ratio 0.99, P = .7) but declining in women (incidence rate ratio 0.93, P = .02). Over the study, AS clinical characteristics remained remarkably stable and AVR performance grew and was more prompt (from 1.3 [0.1–3.3] years in 1997–2000 to 0.5 [0.2–2.1] years in 2013–16, P = .001) but undertreatment remained prominent (>40%). Early AVR was associated with survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55 [0.42–0.71], P < .0001). Despite these improvements, overall mortality (3-month 8% and 3-year 36%), was swift, considerable and unabated (all P ≥ .4) throughout the study. Conclusions Over 20 years, the population incidence of severe AS remained stable with increased absolute case burden related to population growth. Despite stable severe AS presentation, AVR performance grew notably, but while declining, undertreatment remained substantial and disease lethality did not yet decline. These population-based findings have important implications for improving AS management pathways.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

Background— Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography permits the detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities during stress echocardiography, which may improve the accuracy of the test in detecting coronary artery stenoses. We hypothesized that this technique could be used after a bolus injection of the selective A2A receptor agonist regadenoson to rapidly and safely detect coronary artery stenoses. Methods and Results— In 100 patients referred for quantitative coronary angiography, real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed during a continuous intravenous infusion of 3% Definity at baseline and at 2-minute intervals for up to 6 minutes after a regadenoson bolus injection (400 μg). Myocardial perfusion was assessed by examination of myocardial contrast replenishment after brief high mechanical index impulses. A perfusion defect was defined as a delay (>2 seconds) in myocardial contrast replenishment in 2 contiguous segments. Wall motion was also analyzed. The overall sensitivity/specificity/accuracy for myocardial perfusion analysis in detecting a >50% diameter stenosis was 80%/74%/78%, whereas for wall motion analysis it was 60%/72%/66% ( P <0.001 for differences in sensitivity). Sensitivity for myocardial perfusion analysis was highest on images obtained during the first 2 minutes after regadenoson bolus ( P <0.001 compared with wall motion), whereas wall motion sensitivity was highest at the 4-to-6–minute period after the bolus. No significant side effects occurred after regadenoson bolus injection. Conclusions— Regadenoson real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography appears to be a feasible, safe, and rapid noninvasive method for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT0087369.