Citations

Abstract Background Most oncology therapeutics have limited distribution into the brain, and developing strategies to overcome this limitation would be clinically impactful. While therapeutic radiation is often cited as a strategy to accomplish this, there are no published studies demonstrating the effect of radiation on drug distribution into the brain or brain tumors. Methods Mice were treated with brain radiation (6 Gy × 5, 4 Gy × 10; 40 Gy × 1) and dosed with drugs (levetiracetam, cefazolin, nedisertib, brigimadlin, apitolisib, or GNE-317) at times ranging from just prior to months after radiation. Plasma and tissue drug concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Results Radiation did not significantly enhance drug delivery into brain tissue for levetiracetam, cefazolin, GNE-317, apitolisib, or nedisertib at any time post-radiation. Even a single, supra-therapeutic dose of radiation (40 Gy) did not significantly affect brain distribution of GNE-317 or apitolisib (P ≥ .07) from 16 to 160 hours post-radiation. For brigimadlin, radiation (6 Gy × 5) was associated with a modest but significant increase in drug accumulation only at 72 hours post-radiation (brain-to-plasma ratio 0.014 ± 0.006 vs. 0.025 ± 0.010, respectively; P = .04), but not at any other timepoint (24 hours, 15, 28, 94, 133, 183 days; P > .05). Similarly, radiation (6 Gy × 5) of orthotopic tumors did not increase levels of brigimadlin in GBM10 or GBM108 or nedisertib in GBM108 (P > .05). Conclusions Radiation had no meaningful impact on drug delivery into brain or brain tumors for the drugs tested.

Abstract Background Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) quantify the clinical relevance of quality of life results at the individual patient and group level. The aim of this study was to estimate the MCID for the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and the Worst and Usual Fatigue items in patients with brain or CNS cancer undergoing curative radiotherapy. Methods Data from a multi-site prospective registry was used. The MCID was calculated using distribution-based and anchor-based approaches. For the anchor-based approach, the fatigue item from the PROMIS-10 served as the anchor to determine if a patient improved, deteriorated, or had no change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT). We compared the unadjusted means on the BFI for the 3 groups to calculate the MCID. For the distribution-based approaches, we calculated the MCID as 0.5 SD of the scores and as 1.96 times the standard error of measurement. Results Three-hundred and fifty nine patients with brain or CNS tumors undergoing curative radiotherapy filled out the 9-item BFI at baseline and EOT. The MCID for the BFI was 1.33 (ranging from 0.99 to 1.70 across the approaches), 1.51 (ranging from 1.16 to 2.02) and 1.76 (ranging from 1.38 to 2.14) for the usual and worst fatigue items, respectively. Conclusions This study provides the MCID ranges for the BFI and Worst and Usual fatigue items, which will allow clinically meaningful conclusions to be drawn from BFI scores. These results can be used to select optimal treatments for patients with brain or CNS cancer or to interpret BFI scores from clinical trials.

ObjectiveHuman adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) were used to rehabilitate bone damaged by osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in an established animal model.Study DesignProspective animal study.SettingAcademic department laboratory.Subjects and MethodsAfter institutional review board and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, 24 athymic nude rats were divided into 5 groups: 4 groups irradiated (20 Gy) by brachytherapy catheter placed at the left hemimandible and 1 mock irradiation control (n = 4). For all groups, ORN was initiated by extraction of the central molar 1 week later. After 28 days, animals (n = 5/group) received injection at the extraction site with saline (SAL), ADSCs, platelet‐rich plasma and collagen (PRP/COL), or ADSCs + PRP/COL. Rats were sacrificed 28 days later and their mandibles harvested for histopathology analysis (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and fibrosis) and bone volume measurement using 3‐dimensional micro–computed tomography.ResultsAll but 1 rat survived the experiment period (23/24). Radiographic and histological analysis revealed 60% bone loss in the SAL group compared with the nonirradiated control. Injection of ADSCs increased jaw region bone volume by up to 36% (P <. 01). All experimental groups (ADSC, PRP/COL, and ADSC + PRP/COL) showed dramatically decreased osteoclast counts (P <. 001) while injection of PRP/COL with or without ADSCs increased osteoblasts. Increased fibrosis was observed after ADSC injection (P <. 05).ConclusionThe application of human ADSCs to an induced mandibular osteoradionecrosis model in athymic rats results in increased deposition or preservation of bone, demonstrated both histologically and radiographically. This offers an encouraging possible treatment option for translational research in this difficult disease.

ObjectiveWe aim to create a model of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in athymic rats. Athymic rats provide an immunosuppressed environment whereby human stem cells and biomaterials can be used to investigate regenerative solutions for osteoradionecrosis, bridging the gap between in vivo testing and clinical application.Study DesignProspective animal study.SettingAcademic otolaryngology department laboratory.Subjects and MethodsAfter Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, 10 athymic nude rats were divided into 2 groups. The experimental group (n = 6) underwent irradiation (20 Gy), while the control group (n = 4) underwent sham irradiation catheter placement only. All 10 rats underwent extraction of the second mandibular molar 7 days later. The rats were sacrificed 28 days after dental extraction, and their mandibles were harvested. The mandibles were examined with histologic analysis and bone volume analysis based on 3‐dimensional micro–computed tomography.ResultsAll 10 rats survived the experiment period. Radiographic and histologic analysis revealed decreased bone formation in the experimental group compared with the control group. Jaw region volume ratio was 0.83 for the experimental group versus 0.97 in the control group (P =. 003). The region‐of‐interest volume ratio was 0.75 in the experimental group and 0.97 in the control group (P =. 005). Histologically, there were increased osteoclasts (P =. 02) and decreased osteoblasts (P =. 001) as well as increased fibrosis in the experimental group versus the control group.ConclusionMandibular osteoradionecrosis can be effectively and reproducibly produced in an athymic rat model. This will allow further research to study regenerative medicine in an athymic rat model.

Objectives: To determine long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with trimodality therapy (chemoradiotherapy [CRT] and surgery, TMT) or definitive CRT. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with curative intent at our institution between 1998 and 2004. Identified patients were separated into 3 groups: patients who received TMT, patients who received CRT, and patients who began treatment with trimodality intent but did not undergo surgery (PTMT). Local control, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Among the 265 patients included, median follow-up was 6.4 years for surviving patients and 1.7 years for all patients. Type of esophageal cancer was adenocarcinoma in 213 patients (80%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 46 patients (17%). Treatment groups comprised 169 patients (64%) completing TMT, 46 patients medically unable to undergo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (PTMT), and 50 (19%) who underwent CRT. Median OS was 20.5 months; actuarial 5- and 10-year OS were 27% and 12%, respectively. The TMT group had the highest 5- and 10-year OS (32% and 19%, respectively). Local control rates at 2, 5, and 10 years for all patients were 80%, 70%, and 69%, respectively. By treatment modality, 5-year local control was best (82%) for TMT, compared with 60% for CRT and 40% for PTMT groups (P<0.001). Conclusions: Patients who completed TMT had the best local control and long-term OS. In the context of TMT, surgery seemed more beneficial in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.