Citations

7062 Background: MCL is a rare and aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are an established standard of care for R/R MCL. However, comparative effectiveness data for different BTK inhibitors for R/R MCL are limited. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of zanu and acala in US patients with R/R MCL based on overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Komodo health administrative claims data. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with ≥2 MCL diagnoses and continuous enrollment or activities within 1 year prior to and 3 months following the index date. Patients were required to initiate monotherapy with zanu (index period: November 2019 to August 2025) or acala (index period: October 2017 to August 2025) as a second-line or later (2L+) treatment, with index date defined as the first observed claim for zanu or acala. Patients with evidence of clinical trial participation, end stage renal disease or prior stem cell transplant were excluded. Outcomes included OS (time from index date to all-cause mortality) and TTNT (time from index date to subsequent therapy with an allowable gap of 120 days). If an outcome was not observed, patients were censored at the date of last activity or enrollment end date. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was adjusted for age, sex, US region, treatment initiation year and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: In total, 2219 patients (zanu, n=931; acala, n=1288) were eligible and included in the study. The mean age was higher in the zanu (72.3 years; SD, 9.4) vs acala cohort (71.4 years; SD, 9.7). Most patients were male (zanu, 71%; acala, 75%), non-Hispanic white (zanu, 73%; acala, 74%), and the mean CCI was 3.5 (SD, 3.2) and 3.6 (SD, 3.1) in the zanu and acala cohorts, respectively. Median follow-up was 14.8 and 18.2 months in zanu and acala cohorts, respectively. Median TTNT was 26.7 months for zanu and 20.8 months for acala. Median OS was not reached for zanu and was 60.6 months for acala. In the unadjusted model, zanu had a longer TTNT (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P =.012) and OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88; P <.001). After IPTW adjustment, TTNT and OS favored zanu treatment (TTNT: IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P =.025; OS: IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P =.03). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis of US health claims data, zanu monotherapy demonstrated significantly longer TTNT and improved OS compared with acala in patients receiving 2L+ therapy for MCL. These findings support zanu as an effective BTK inhibitor for R/R MCL.

Abstract Introduction Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have changed the treatment algorithm for patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Efficacy was demonstrated for zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients in the ALPINE (NCT03734016) trial, for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in the ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696) trial, and for acalabrutinib in the ASCEND (NCT00135226) trial. While there is limited head-to-head comparative trial data of all covalent BTKis in the treatment of high-risk R/R CLL, a previously published network meta-analysis (NMA) used data from the ALPINE, ELEVATE-RR, and ASCEND trials, and reported that zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly improved relative efficacy compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL (Shadman 2025). Within this NMA, high-risk R/R CLL populations were defined based on the prespecified definitions within each trial, including patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations in the ALPINE and ASCEND trials, and del(17p)/del(11q) in the ELEVATE-RR trial. This study aimed to compare zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one progression or death. Methods A model was developed to evaluate the NNT among high-risk R/R CLL patients to avoid a progression or death. Progression free survival (PFS) data for zanubrutinib in high-risk patients were extracted from the ALPINE trial. PFS values for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were derived from the previously published NMA study. PFS for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were calculated by applying PFS hazard ratio from the NMA results to the zanubrutinib PFS value for the high-risk population in the ALPINE trial. 24-month PFS (72.6% for zanubrutinib, 52.0% for ibrutinib, and 55.9% for acalabrutinib) were used for the base case analysis of the model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the impact of alternative PFS inputs for ibrutinib, derived directly from the high-risk populations in ALPINE trial (unadjusted). Results The base case results from the NNT model indicate that for the treatment of patients with high-risk R/R CLL over 24-months, every five patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of ibrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death and every six patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of acalabrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death. Applying the model result to a hypothetical scenario of 100 patients with high-risk R/R CLL treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for two years finds approximately 20 patients will avoid disease progression events or deaths. Treating the same population with zanubrutinib versus acalabrutinib for two years will result in the avoidance of 17 disease progression events or death. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent NNT results.Conclusions The NNT analysis suggests that among high-risk R/R CLL patients, zanubrutinib is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. Over 24 months, zanubrutinib demonstrated a NNT of five to prevent one disease progression or death compared to ibrutinib, and an NNT of six compared to acalabrutinib, in high-risk R/R CLL patients. Study findings should be interpreted based on modeling assumptions and potential patient population differences across trials.

e19049 Background: Acala and zanu are 2nd generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) that have demonstrated improved safety profiles vs 1st generation BTKi ibrutinib in clinical trials. While head-to-head comparison of zanu vs acala is lacking, a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials provided a comprehensive, indirect comparison of the AE profiles in B-cell malignancies (Hwang, Hemasphere. 2023;7(S3):1134). This study aims to evaluate costs and impacts on quality of life (QoL) for zanu vs acala using their AE profiles. Methods: A health economic model was developed to determine cost and QoL associated with AE management for zanu and acala. The incidence rates ( IRs) of all grade and grade ≥3 AEs of interest (n=21, including bleeding events, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cytopenias, infections, headache, arthralgia, diarrhea) were taken from the meta-analysis. Additional model inputs, such as disutility, average duration of AE, and unit cost of each AE were sourced from published literature and publicly available cost databases in consultation with clinical experts. The model was developed from the US perspective, considering Medicare costs, inflated to 2023 USD. Model outcomes were AE management cost (= IR * unit cost) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to AE (= IR * Disutility * Duration/365.25). Results: In the base-case scenario (considering all AEs), treating a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients (pts) with zanu instead of acala yielded cost savings of $124K and 3.7 QALY gains (i.e., 3.7 years extra in full health). Subgroup analysis for severe (grade ≥3) and non-severe AEs (grade 1-2) demonstrated similar trends. A sensitivity analysis limited to AEs significantly different between zanu and acala (n=13) yielded consistent results. Additionally, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, conducted with 1000 iterations to account for uncertainty in model parameters, confirmed robustness of the model, indicating stable conclusions across a wide range of parameter uncertainties. Conclusions: This analysis suggested that zanu is cost-saving and associated with added health benefits compared to acala in terms of AE management in pts with B-cell malignancies. Should these results derived from meta-analysis of clinical trial data be applicable to real-world pt populations across different indications, the potential cost savings could be considerable. These results could be further improved if the differences in efficacy of zanu vs acala are also incorporated. [Table: see text]