Citations

Abstract This article summarizes data for 13 investigational treatments for which at least preliminary seizure outcome data in patients with epilepsy were reported at the Eighteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices held in Madrid, Spain, on May 3–6, 2026. The treatments reviewed include bexicaserin, a selective 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT, serotonin) type 2C (5‐HT 2C ) receptor superagonist investigated as a treatment for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs); BMB‐101, a selective 5‐HT 2C receptor agonist investigated for the treatment of absence seizures and DEEs; elsunersen, an antisense oligonucleotide designed for the treatment of early‐onset SCN2A ‐DEE; EPX‐100 (clemizole hydrochloride), an antihistamine endowed with agonist activity at 5‐HT 2A and 5‐HT 2B receptors, repurposed as a treatment for DEEs; ES‐481, an antagonist of α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors containing the transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein γ8 (TARP‐γ8), under investigation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy; ETX‐101, a gene therapy in development for the treatment of SCN1A ‐positive Dravet syndrome; PrevEp‐006 (intranasal seletracetam), a synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) ligand under investigation as an acute seizure rescue therapy; radiprodil, a negative allosteric modulator that binds to the GluN2B subunit of the N ‐methyl‐ D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor, in development for the treatment of seizures and other symptoms associated with GRIN‐related neurodevelopmental disorder, tuberous sclerosis complex, and focal cortical dysplasia type II; RAP‐219, a selective negative allosteric modulator of TARP‐γ8, in development for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy; relutrigine, a selective disease‐state sodium channel modulator investigated as a treatment for SCN2A ‐ and SCN8A ‐DEE; Staccato Alprazolam, a breath‐actuated device that delivers alprazolam to the lungs for rapid seizure termination; vormatrigine, a functionally selective sodium channel modulator in development for the treatment of focal seizures; and zorevunersen, an antisense oligonucleotide engineered to restore endogenous Nav1.1 protein expression, investigated for the treatment of Dravet syndrome. Overall, the evidence reviewed justifies expectations for improved health outcomes for the millions of children and adults with epilepsy who do not fully benefit from existing therapies.

Abstract Over the last 34 years, the Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices has provided an interactive forum for stakeholders to discuss investigational and recently licensed treatments for seizures and epilepsy. The Eighteenth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs and Devices (EILAT XVIII) took place in Madrid, Spain, on May 3–6, 2026. This article provides summaries of eight treatments in preclinical and early clinical development that were presented at EILAT XVIII. These include AUT00206, a positive allosteric modulator of Kv3.1 and Kv3.2 voltage‐gated potassium channels in development for the treatment of rare epilepsy syndromes as well as neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders; ION283, an antisense oligonucleotide designed to suppress the expression of glycogen synthase 1, under investigation for the treatment of Lafora disease; MSCA‐7136, a selective allosteric RAS/mitogen‐activated protein kinase—extracellular signal regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of focal seizures associated with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex; OV329, a selective inhibitor of γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) aminotransferase, in development for the treatment of drug‐resistant focal seizures; PTI5803 (probenecid), an uricosuric agent and a blocker of pannexin 1 channels, repurposed as a treatment for seizures associated with focal cortical dysplasia; simufilam, a filamin A modulator under investigation for the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex‐related epilepsy; SN‐2000, a selective allosteric phosphodiesterase 4B inhibitor, in development for the treatment of focal seizures; and sodium selenate, a promoter of the dephosphorylation of pathological hyperphosphorylated tau in the brain, under investigation as a disease‐modifying agent in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Treatments in more advanced clinical development are discussed in an accompanying article.

Objective: To evaluate the institutional learning curve of robotic liver resection (RLR), its association with surgical complexity and outcomes in an international multicenter cohort. Summary of Background Data: RLR is increasingly adopted worldwide, but the dynamics of the learning process and its impact on surgical outcomes remain poorly defined. Methods: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent RLR between 06/2013 and 12/2024 across 22 expert centers. Based on the first 150 cases at each center, three phases were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Risk-adjusted generalized additive models were used to assess the learning process. Benchmark performance was compared to international reference values. Results: Among 2,331 patients, the most common indications were hepatocellular carcinoma (36%), benign lesions (23%) and colorectal liver metastases (21%). Operative time decreased after achieving competency (case #62), from 240 to 220 minutes ( P <0.001). Major morbidity reached a plateau during the proficiency phase (cases #63–138; 9% vs. 11%, P =0.144), while progression to mastery (cases #139–150) was associated with a higher rate of textbook outcome (76% vs. 87%, P =0.021). In contrast, conversion (5.1% vs. 4.9% vs. 2%), bile leak (4.0% vs. 5.3% vs. 3.8%), and 90-day mortality (0.7% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.9%) remained low and stable across all learning phases. Importantly, benchmark criteria for operative time, hospital stay, and textbook outcome were met across all complexity groups, including during the early learning phase. Conclusions: Robotic liver surgery shows progressive outcome improvement with early achievement of benchmark-level results and stable performance across increasing complexity. These findings indicate that, in experienced centers, RLR can be safely implemented and integrated into clinical practice, supporting its key role in modern hepatobiliary surgery.

Objective: The European Guidelines Meeting on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery was held in Southampton on February 10 and 11, 2017 with the aim of presenting and validating clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Background: The exponential growth of laparoscopic liver surgery in recent years mandates the development of clinical practice guidelines to direct the speciality's continued safe progression and dissemination. Methods: A unique approach to the development of clinical guidelines was adopted. Three well-validated methods were integrated: the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology for the assessment of evidence and development of guideline statements; the Delphi method of establishing expert consensus, and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument for the assessment of the methodological quality and external validation of the final statements. Results: Along with the committee chairman, 22 European experts; 7 junior experts and an independent validation committee of 11 international surgeons produced 67 guideline statements for the safe progression and dissemination of laparoscopic liver surgery. Each of the statements reached at least a 95% consensus among the experts and were endorsed by the independent validation committee. Conclusion: The European Guidelines Meeting for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery has produced a set of clinical practice guidelines that have been independently validated for the safe development and progression of laparoscopic liver surgery. The Southampton Guidelines have amalgamated the available evidence and a wealth of experts’ knowledge taking in consideration the relevant stakeholders’ opinions and complying with the international methodology standards.