Citations

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "White, Jaclyn".

Presentation, surgical outcome, and supplementary motor area syndrome risk of posterior superior frontal gyrus tumors
Jusué-Torres, Ignacio , White, Jaclyn J., Bouchal, Samantha M. , Hsu, Andrea R. , Ha, Yooree , Pumford, Andrew D. , Hong, Sukwoo , Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Wang, Kimberly , Helal, Ahmed , Brown, Desmond A., Jusue-Torres, Ignacio , Bouchal, Samantha M , Bauman, Megan M. J. , Brown, Desmond , Parney, Ian F.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery | August 31, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-12

10.3171/2024.5.jns231850 | PMID 39213666 Get It

OBJECTIVE Following resection of posterior superior frontal gyrus (PSFG) tumors, patients can experience supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome consisting of contralateral hemiapraxia and/or speech apraxia. Given the heterogeneity of PSFG tumors, the authors sought to determine the risk of postoperative deficits and assess predictors of outcomes for all intraparenchymal PSFG tumors undergoing surgery (biopsy or resection), regardless of histology. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of adult PSFG-region tumors undergoing biopsy or resection by a single surgeon. RESULTS A total of 106 consecutive patients undergoing 123 procedures (21 biopsies, 102 resections) fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anaplastic astrocytomas were the most frequent among resected tumors (39% vs 29%), while glioblastomas were most common among biopsies (38% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001). The biopsy cohort was more likely to have tumor involvement outside the PSFG (90% vs 62%) (p = 0.011), most commonly in the motor cortex (67% vs 31%) (p = 0.005). Seizures were the most common presenting symptom in the resection cohort (p = 0.017), while motor deficits were more common in the biopsy cohort (58% vs 29%) (p < 0.001). Immediate postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 71 cases (58%), but only 3 of the deficits were permanent at 6 months of follow-up (2%). Postoperative SMA syndrome occurred in 48 cases (47%) and was significantly associated with involvement of the motor cortex (p = 0.018) or cingulate gyrus (p = 0.023), which were also significant in multivariate analysis as risk factors for SMA syndrome. However, postoperative SMA syndrome was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.51). There were no perioperative deaths, but corpus callosum involvement (p < 0.001), contrast enhancement (p = 0.003), and glioblastoma pathology (p = 0.038) predicted worse overall survival in patients undergoing resection. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of all patients undergoing resection of PSFG-region tumors experience a postoperative SMA syndrome. Individuals with corpus callosum and/or motor cortex involvement may be at an increased risk of experiencing SMA syndrome. However, these deficits are usually transient, and the risk of permanent new deficits is very low (3%). Preoperative characteristics including corpus callosum involvement and tumor enhancement—in addition to pathology—might serve as predictors of overall survival within this patient population.
INNV-32. RELIABILITY OF SERIAL NEUROPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TO DIFFERENTIATE TUMOR PROGRESSION FROM PSEUDO-PROGRESSION IN GLIOMA
Khoury, Lara, Harrison, W.T.A. , Ramkissoon, Shakti, Stogner‐Underwood, Kimberly, Mott, Ryan T., Miller, James, Lesser, Glenn J. , Cramer, Christina K. , Laxton, Adrian W. , White, Jaclyn, Harrison, William, Chan, Michael David , Tatter, Stephen B. , Tavolara, Thomas Erol , Hsu, Fang‐Chi , Strowd, Roy E.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2023 | Volume: 25 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v163-v164

10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0621 Get It

Abstract Histopathology is the gold standard for distinguishing tumor recurrence from treatment-induced necrosis but differentiating pseudoprogression from true recurrence is challenging in tumors with ambiguous morphological features. Prior research reported a 36% inter-rater agreement during suspected recurrence (Holdhoff et al., 2019). While serial radiographic and laboratory assessments are common, serial histopathological assessments are not. This study evaluated agreement and factors influencing assessment of active and inactive tumors through single and multiple time-point histopathological assessments. Patients who underwent initial and subsequent reoperation were identified, and their available histology slides were examined retrospectively. Four independent neuropathologists conducted two types of reviews: single time-point reviews using most recent biopsy/surgery slides, and multiple time-point reviews comparing images from initial and repeat biopsies taken 1-3 months apart. Neuropathologists completed a questionnaire assessing various tumor characteristics. Assignments were categorized as "active tumor," "treatment effect," or "unable to classify." 324 assessments were conducted (108 single time-point, 216 multiple time-point). Intraclass correlation coefficients for single vs. multiple time-point assessments were 0.72-0.93 for active tumors and 0.57-0.86 for inactive tumors. Pathologists' assessment of % inactive tumor was influenced by mitotic activity (p= 0.0028), cellularity (p&lt; 0.0001), hyalinized vessels (p= 0.0019), and necrosis (p= 0.0046). Evaluation of % active tumor was influenced by hyalinized vessels (p= 0.0006), mitotic activity (p&lt; 0.0001), cellularity (p&lt; 0.0001), and microvascular proliferation (p= 0.0093), with the latter three factors specifically affecting final sign-out pathology. Serial histopathological assessment didn’t affect determination of % active or inactive tumor. No association between % inactive tumor and fibrinoid necrosis for single time-point (p= 0.34) but a strong negative association was seen for serial assessment (p= 0.0006). Inter-rater agreement was higher for identifying active tumors than inactive tumors in both case reviews. Changes in necrosis between tissue samples in single vs. multiple timepoint assessments influenced pathologists' assessment of % inactive tumor.