Citations

We describe an unusual case of a woman in her 30s who had recently undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and presented to the emergency department with a 6-week history of intractable nausea and vomiting, accompanied by progressively worsening bilateral leg weakness. Examination revealed persistent upbeat nystagmus, paraparesis, areflexia in the lower extremities, brisk reflexes in the upper extremities and diminished sensation across all modalities in lower limbs. Brain and spine MRIs were unremarkable, there was no nerve root enhancement. Laboratory tests revealed thiamine deficiency, with a level of 28 nmol/L (reference range: 70–108 nmol/L). No gangliocyte antibodies were detected. Cerebrospinal fluid study showed no albuminocytological dissociation. Electrodiagnostic studies showed evidence of lumbosacral polyradiculopathy. The patient was eventually diagnosed with thiamine deficiency-related acute nutritional axonal neuropathy and Wernicke’s encephalopathy. After aggressive thiamine supplementation and 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation, her leg strength improved, but she still requires assistance to ambulate.

Purpose: This case report aims to raise awareness among health care professionals and students that acute onset Wernicke's aphasia could be misinterpreted as delirium. In such a context, a patient's psychological/emotional reactions (e.g., agitation, anger) to aphasia associated communication breakdowns can be mismanaged as primary psychiatric concerns. Conclusion: Preliminary suggestions for relevant clinical practice are offered.

Abstract Standard of care (SOC) for ndGBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001 is an autologous biologic-device combination immunotherapy for the treatment of ndGBM that consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA, irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. In a phase 1b study, IGV-001 was well tolerated without unexpected adverse events in subjects with ndGBM. Multiple efficacy signals were observed, including significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. Here, we present early safety data from the phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04485949) designed to assess efficacy and safety of IGV-001 in subjects with ndGBM across 20 sites in the United States. After surgical resection, subjects were randomized 2:1 and treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. The primary outcome is PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety. As of May 22, 2024, 99 subjects were randomized and 95 implanted with IGV-001 or placebo plus SOC. A total of 39/45 (86.7%) subjects had sufficient follow-up time after initiated treatment with concurrent radiation and temozolomide. Nine of 72 randomized (12.5%) discontinued treatment, including 7 who stopped during the SOC treatment period. None ceased treatment for adverse events, protocol deviations, or death. A total of 11/72 (15.3%) randomized subjects discontinued the study after randomization. A review of blinded safety data did not show any emerging risk and supports no change to the benefit-risk profile of IGV-001 versus placebo. Updated data will be presented.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective humanised monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody for treatment of UC and CD. This post-authorization safety study (PASS) compared long-term safety in patients (pts) treated with VDZ or other biologics for UC or CD. Methods This was a prospective, observational, multicentre, cohort study in pts with UC or CD starting treatment with VDZ or other biologics (NCT02674308, EUPAS6469). Pts were biologic naïve (VDZ=35%, Other biologic=65%) or had prior exposure to biologics other than VDZ and were followed for up to 7 yrs. Pts were treated under usual standard of care as directed by their physician with no discontinuation from the study due to physician-directed treatment changes. The primary safety outcome was serious infections and was compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted by propensity score (with other biologics as reference). Secondary safety outcomes were adverse events (AE) of special interest (AESI) as listed in Tables 2 and 3. Results In total, 5208 patients were enrolled across 21 countries between Mar 2015 and Jul 2019. The full analysis set comprised 5008 pts (VDZ=2502; other biologic=2506) and mean (SD) study duration was 37.4 (14.1) months. Consistent with the observational nature of the study and the current standard of care, the baseline characteristics in the two cohorts were imbalanced (Table 1). The overall treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) rate was 61.3% (VDZ) and 59.5% (other biologic), with serious AEs in 27.5% (VDZ) and 25.7% (other biologic), respectively. In UC pts, the incidence rate (IR) of serious infections were: 0.014 (95% CI: 0.010, 0.019) [VDZ] and 0.015 (0.010, 0.023) [other biologic], with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.018 (0.931, 1.114), p=0.70 (Table 2). In CD pts, corresponding findings were 0.012 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.017) [VDZ] and 0.006 (95% CI: 0.004, 0.009) [other biologic] with HR of 1.035 (0.959, 1.117), p=0.38 (Table 3). The incidence of primary and secondary safety outcomes is reported in Table 2 for UC and Table 3 for CD. There were no safety issues relating to pregnancy and no cases of PML observed. There were 19 deaths in the VDZ cohort (1 case of pneumonia deemed as treatment-related); and 13 deaths in the other biologic cohort, 2 cases deemed treatment-related (one case septic shock and pneumonia; one case non-small cell lung cancer). Clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) measures were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion In this long-term, prospective, real-world observational study of a large multinational population under routine standard of care there was no new safety signal identified in relation to VDZ. Results are consistent with the known safety profile of VDZ.

ABSTRACTPURPOSETo determine interobserver spatial variability in language area localization using three commonly employed language tasks.MATERIALS AND METHODSWith institutional review board approval, 125 fMRI time series from 50 different clinical language cases were retrospectively reviewed by three blinded readers who selected 3‐dimensional points representing the perceived center of Wernicke's and Broca's areas using three language tasks (semantic decision, SD; sentence comprehension, SC; and silent word generation, WG). Point dispersion values were then calculated using the perimeter of the 3‐dimensional triangle defined by the three readers’ selections.RESULTSAfter resolving interobserver laterality disagreements, there was no difference in spatial variability between the three tasks (P = .069). The SD task had the fewest interobserver laterality disagreements (P = .028) and the SC task had fewer failed localizations for Broca's area (P = .050) and Wernicke's area (P = .013).CONCLUSIONWhile there were no differences between interobserver spatial variability in language area localization between the three tasks, language task choice impacts the accuracy of fMRI language area identification because tasks vary in their rates of interobserver laterality disagreements and failed localizations. A combination of tasks including one with low laterality disagreements (eg, SD) and one with few failed localizations (eg, SC) may offer the best combination.