Citations

Importance Hypopigmented mycosis fungoides (HMF) is uncommon in adults, and data on clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes remain sparse. Objective To investigate the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of adults with HMF in a large multicenter cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted from January 2011 to October 2023 at 6 US tertiary referral centers and included adults (18 years or older at diagnosis) with biopsy-confirmed HMF and hypopigmentation documented at diagnosis, with a median (range) follow-up of 39 (1-347) months. Data were analyzed from February to December 2025. Exposures Clinical variant, immunophenotype predominance, and polymerase chain reaction–based T-cell receptor ( TCR ) gene rearrangement in peripheral blood and/or skin. Main Outcomes and Measures Best overall response, defined as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease, and progression to a higher stage. Results The cohort included 224 adults with HMF (median [range] age, 44 [18-74] years), of whom 164 (73%) were women (60 men [27%]), 5 (2%) were Asian individuals, 1 (0.4%) was a Hispanic/Latino individual, 1 (0.4%) was a Middle Eastern individual, 19 (8%) were White individuals, and 186 (83%) were Black individuals; 219 (98%) presented with early-stage disease. Most had hypopigmented lesions only (159 [71%]), whereas 65 (29%) exhibited mixed-variant mycosis fungoides; outcomes were similar between groups. Among 141 patients with available immunophenotyping, 88 (63%) had CD8-positive predominance. Among 207 treated patients, most (179 [90%]) received skin-directed therapy alone. Among 198 evaluable patients, the best overall response was complete response for 52 (26%), partial response for 101 (51%), stable disease for 34 (17%), and progressive disease for 11 (6%). Over a median (range) follow-up of 39 (1-347) months, 14 of 224 patients (6%) experienced progression to a higher stage, including 5 of 219 patients (2%) with early-stage disease at baseline who experienced progression to advanced-stage disease. Peripheral blood TCR monoclonality was detected in 23 of 85 tested patients (27%) and was associated with poorer treatment response but not with disease progression. Conclusions and Relevance The finding of this cohort study suggest that adult HMF demonstrated a generally indolent course, with favorable response to skin-directed therapy, irrespective of immunophenotype or mixed-variant presentation. Peripheral blood TCR monoclonality was associated with lower treatment response but not disease progression.

Objective To identify primary care structures and processes that have the highest and lowest impact on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes as well as to assess the feasibility of implementing these structures and processes into practice. Design A two-round Delphi study was conducted to establish consensus on the impact and feasibility of 258 primary care structures and processes. Participants 29 primary care providers, health system leaders and health services researchers in the USA. Outcomes Primary outcomes were (1) consensus on the impact of each structure and process on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes, separately and (2) consensus on feasibility of implementation by primary care practices. Results Consensus on high impact and feasibility of implementation was reached on four items for chronic disease management: ‘Providers use motivational interviewing to help patients set goals’, ‘Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel’, ‘Practice has onsite providers or staff that speak the most dominant, non-English language spoken by patients’ and ‘Practice includes mental health providers and/or behavioural health specialists in care team’ and seven items for screening and prevention: ‘Practice utilizes standing protocols and orders’, ‘Practice generates reports to alert clinicians to missed targets and to identify gaps in care, such as overdue visits, needed vaccinations, screenings or other preventive services’, ‘Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel’, ‘Practice sets performance goals and uses benchmarking to track quality of care’, ‘Practice uses performance feedback to identify practice-specific areas of improvement’, ‘Practice builds quality improvement activities into practice operations’ and ‘Pre-visit planning data are reviewed during daily huddles’. Only ‘Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel’ appeared on both lists. Conclusion Findings suggest that practices need to focus on implementing mostly distinct, rather than common, structures and processes to optimise chronic disease and preventive care.

AbstractObjectivesTo report lessons from integrating the methods and perspectives of clinical informatics (CI) and implementation science (IS) in the context of Improving the Management of symPtoms during and following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium pragmatic trials.Materials and MethodsIMPACT informaticists, trialists, and implementation scientists met to identify challenges and solutions by examining robust case examples from 3 Research Centers that are deploying systematic symptom assessment and management interventions via electronic health records (EHRs). Investigators discussed data collection and CI challenges, implementation strategies, and lessons learned.ResultsCI implementation strategies and EHRs systems were utilized to collect and act upon symptoms and impairments in functioning via electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) captured in ambulatory oncology settings. Limited EHR functionality and data collection capabilities constrained the ability to address IS questions. Collecting ePRO data required significant planning and organizational champions adept at navigating ambiguity.DiscussionBringing together CI and IS perspectives offers critical opportunities for monitoring and managing cancer symptoms via ePROs. Discussions between CI and IS researchers identified and addressed gaps between applied informatics implementation and theory-based IS trial and evaluation methods. The use of common terminology may foster shared mental models between CI and IS communities to enhance EHR design to more effectively facilitate ePRO implementation and clinical responses.ConclusionImplementation of ePROs in ambulatory oncology clinics benefits from common understanding of the concepts, lexicon, and incentives between CI implementers and IS researchers to facilitate and measure the results of implementation efforts.

AbstractCancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium’s conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.