Citations

Background Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder in which plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) develop in approximately 30% to 50% of affected individuals, often causing substantial morbidity. Treatment of NF1-associated PNs is challenging due to disease variability and tumor complexity. Observations In the Phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543), mirdametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in children and adults with symptomatic PNs, achieving confirmed objective responses in 52% of children and 41% of adults, with substantial reductions in target tumor PN volume and improvements in patient- and parent proxy-reported outcomes. However, dermatologic adverse events (AEs) are common with MEK inhibitors, including mirdametinib, and can impact adherence and quality of life. While the ReNeu protocol included supportive care considerations for skin reactions associated with mirdametinib, some investigators recognized a need for more detailed guidance. The ReNeu Scientific Steering Committee, in collaboration with oncology and oncodermatology experts, developed expert-driven recommendations for the proactive management of mirdametinib-related skin AEs. Conclusions These strategies emphasize early recognition, individualized care, and timely intervention to help reduce the severity of mirdametinib-related skin AEs, minimize dose modifications, and support treatment continuity and long-term treatment goals. Although these recommendations were specifically developed for mirdametinib based on ReNeu trial experience, they may also provide practical guidance for managing skin AEs associated with other MEK inhibitors in clinical practice.

Abstract Introduction Patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) present with varying degrees of systemic illness and frailty. Given the palliative intent of surgery and radiation treatment for MSD, treatment risks must be judiciously weighed against potential benefits. We sought to examine the impact of peroperative nutritional status as measured by the PG-SGA on survival in patients undergoing surgery and radiation for MSD. Methods This study involved an international, multicenter prospective, observational registry of patients with MSD: AO Knowledge Forum Tumor’s Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (MTRON). Variables including baseline demographics, oncologic data, adverse events (medical adverse events and surgical complications), length of stay, and nutritional status were prospectively collected. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) was used to evaluate nutritional status. Results A total of 589 patients were included in this study; 469 (80%) of whom underwent surgery and radiation and 120 (20%) of whom underwent radiation alone. The majority of patients (362, 61%) were classified as well nourished, however, 68 patients (12%) were classified as severely malnourished. Among patients that underwent surgery and radiation, the median overall survival of well nourished patients was 491 days compared to 117 days in the severely malnourished patients (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated severe malnourishment and ECOG performance status of 3 or 4 were associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion Malnutrition as measured by the PG-SGA demonstrated to be significantly and independently associated with perioperative survival in patients with MSD. Further studies that investigate optimal pre-treatment optimization for patients with MSD in order to mitigate morbidity and mortality risk are essential.

Abstract Introduction As the incidence of metastatic spine disease (MSD) increases, treatments to manage refractory pain, pathologic vertebral body fractures, and spinal cord compression are becoming increasingly common. Given the palliative nature of surgical intervention used to achieve tumor control and thus mitigate loss of neurologic function and compromised ambulatory function, it is essential to mitigate the risk of such procedures. Methods The AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor’s Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (MTRON), an international, prospective registry for patients with spinal metastases, was used for this query. Prospective collection included baseline health and demographic information, oncologic data (including Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) score and Bilksy epidural compression classification), and baseline functional status (preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and ECOG scores). Health related quality of life (HRQoL) data included Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) and Euro-QoL measures. Surgery related adverse events (AE’s) were collected using the Spine Adverse Events Severity (SAVES V2) framework. Kaplan-Meir curves were used to assess survival. Results The cohort consisted of 1267 patients, 701 male (55.3%). A total of 245 (19.3%) experienced at least one postoperative AE, the majority of which were considered minor (grade 3 or less). Among the most common were deep wound infections (3.2%), wound dehiscence (2.5%), and urinary infections (2.4%). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, smoking status, ECOG performance, prior radiotherapy, presence of multiple metastases at other sites, and multiple spine metastases were significant risk factors for a postoperative AE. Postoperative AE’s (p = 0.049) and major postoperative AE’s (p = 0.0038) were found to be related to survival as well as a significant change in HRQoL scores (p < 0.001). Conclusion Postoperative AE’s are extremely relevant to the care of patients with MSD and impact both HRQoL and survival.

Abstract Vertebral metastatic disease results from many types of cancer and can have a devastating impact on patient mobility, psychological health, quality of life, and ultimately overall patient survival. However, the development of radiotherapy and surgical techniques has rapidly surged in conjunction with ongoing advances in basic science and translational studies. In this review, we discuss the paradigm shift in our understanding of the epidemiology and treatment algorithms for spinal oncology, ranging from preoperative optimization strategies, radiation and surgical techniques, the utilization of molecular markers and targeted therapeutics in medical oncology, and prognostication tools that underscore a new multidisciplinary approach to spinal oncology care.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, is the first FDA-approved medicine for both adults and children (≥2y) with NF1-PN not amenable to complete resection. In the phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543), confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 41% in adults and 52% in children. This analysis explored relationships between baseline characteristics and mirdametinib responses in ReNeu. METHODS Confirmed ORR was the proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction from baseline in target PN volume by magnetic resonance imaging on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase (“responders”) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Characteristics included age, body surface area (BSA), sex, race, ethnicity, target PN location, PN type (typical, nodular, or solitary nodular), target PN volume, and progression status. Rates of dose reductions and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated. These factors were descriptively analyzed for potential relationships with confirmed objective response (data cutoff: 20September2023). RESULTS With mirdametinib, there was no clear difference between responders (n=53) and non-responders (n=61) in age (mean, 22.89 and 22.67y), BSA (mean, 1.42 and 1.51 m2), sex (60.4% and 57.4% female), race (83.0% and 68.9% White), or ethnicity (83.0% and 85.2% non-Hispanic/Latino). The majority of responders and non-responders had head/neck for target PN location (50.9% and 47.5%), typical PN type (81.1% and 63.9%), and baseline progression status (60.4% and 55.7%). Mean (95% CI) target PN volume was 283.43 (155.19, 411.66) and 415.74 (211.71, 619.77) mL, respectively. Dose reduction (11.3%; 18.0%) and TRAE rates (96.2%; 96.7%) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests mirdametinib provides clinical benefit across a broad range of patient and NF1-PN tumor characteristics; a relationship between analyzed baseline characteristics and confirmed objective response was not established. Mean PN volume was higher in non-responders, though CIs overlapped. Dose reductions and emergence of TRAEs did not appear to impact response to mirdametinib. SUPPORT SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children ≥2 years with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report results from the phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543), including the LTFU. METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib was administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU. We report results through June 12, 2024, approximately 9 months from the previous data cutoff. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children received mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered LTFU. Confirmed objective response rate (ORR, treatment+LTFU phases) was 47% (27/58; 95%CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95%CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Among confirmed responders, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of >50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was –41% (–90%, 13%) in adults and –43% (–98%, 48%) in children. Median duration of response (DoR) was not reached for either age cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults; and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS Improved confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals in the LTFU.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2y) with symptomatic NF1-PN. In ReNeu, symptomatic improvement and PN volume reductions were observed at the earliest assessments (~91 and ~152 days, respectively) and were sustained. This analysis evaluated time to first onset and resolution of commonly reported TRAEs in the ReNeu trial. METHODS Data cutoff (DCO) was September 20, 2023. Median time to first onset and resolution (days) for common TRAEs (≥15%) were evaluated for prepubescents (≥2 to <12y, n=32), postpubescents (≥12 to <18y, n=24), younger adults (≥18 to ≤50y, n=48), and older adults (>50y, n=10). RESULTS Common TRAEs were mostly grades 1 to 2 (83%). In prepubescents, median day (range) of onset was 32 (14, 263) for vomiting, 71 (19, 386) for dermatitis acneiform, 123 (1, 663) for diarrhea, 124 (52, 775) for paronychia, and 127 (2, 663) for nausea. For postpubescents, median day (range) of onset was 8 (1, 438) for diarrhea, 8 (2, 574) for nausea, 12 (1, 252) for dermatitis acneiform, 28 (2, 354) for vomiting, and 110 (43, 245) for paronychia. In younger adults, median day (range) of onset was 5 (1, 352) for nausea, 8 (2, 15) for dermatitis acneiform, 9 (2, 73) for diarrhea, and 29 (1, 264) for vomiting. For older adults, median day (range) of onset was 4 (1, 286) for diarrhea, 9 (2, 15) for nausea, and 13 (2, 38) for dermatitis acneiform. Time to resolution was variable between TRAEs and among patients in all age groups; 90% resolved completely by DCO. Among all patients, 18 had a TRAE of asymptomatic ejection fraction decrease, with all but one resolving by DCO. CONCLUSIONS Overall, common TRAEs arose before treatment benefits and were generally resoluble by DCO. Proactively managing TRAEs may improve treatment experience and adherence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a standardized tool for assessing malnutrition in patients with cancer. The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative nutritional status as measured by PG-SGA on survival in patients requiring surgical intervention and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases. METHODS: Patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery and/or radiation therapy for symptomatic spinal metastases were enrolled in the AO Spine Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network, a prospective international multicenter research registry, between September 2017 and August 2022. Using the PG-SGA, nutritional status was classified into 3 categories: A, well nourished; B, moderately malnourished; and C, severely malnourished. RESULTS: A total of 589 patients met the inclusion criteria; 362 were classified as well nourished (61%), 159 were moderately malnourished (27%), and 68 were severely malnourished (12%). The median survival was 491 days, 328 days, and 117 days for well-nourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished patients, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, severe malnourishment (HR 2.5 95% CI 1.4-4.3, P < .01) and an ECOG performance status of 3 or 4 (HR 2.7 95% CI 1.2-6.0) remained associated with significantly worse survival. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition as measured by the PG-SGA demonstrated to be significantly and independently associated with postoperative survival. The PG-SGA is a simple and useful tool to identify spinal metastases patients at risk of early postoperative mortality, and inclusion in the preoperative evaluation of these patients should be considered.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2 years) with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report updated results from the LTFU phase of the pivotal, phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543) evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirdametinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) are administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle (~2 years) treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU phase. These analyses are inclusive of the treatment and LTFU phases (data cutoff: June 12, 2024; an additional 9 months of cumulative data following the primary analysis). Exploratory analyses reported here included confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive MRI scans within 2 to 6 months, assessed by blinded independent central review), duration of response (DoR), change from baseline in target PN volume, and safety. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children were dosed with mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of mirdametinib treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered the LTFU. Confirmed ORR was 47% (27/58; 95% CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95% CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Of patients with a confirmed objective response, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of &gt;50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was -41% (-90%, 13%) in adults and -43% (-98%, 48%) in children. Median DoR was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting in adults, and diarrhoea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and in 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS An increase in confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib treatment, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children with NF1-PN. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals identified in the LTFU phase. SUPPORTED BY SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Hypertension is the single most important modifiable risk factor for preventable disability and death worldwide and disproportionately affects socially disadvantaged populations. We face a paradox—blood pressure control is low and recent trends suggest it is even declining, despite the availability of inexpensive and effective therapies. A variety of barriers on the system, patient, and healthcare provider side hinder effective drug-based risk factor management. Clinical inertia represents a major barrier on the clinician side, as well as workload and limited education. Common barriers on the patient side include limited English proficiency, low health literacy, and nonadherence with misaligned incentives, limited resources, lack of structured clinical pathways, and reimbursement issues. New innovations in the field of RNA-targeted therapies and device-based interventions could prevent and potentially even cure diseases previously designated as chronic health conditions, such as hypertension. Such novel therapies could potentially overcome several major barriers to effective treatment, including nonadherence. Drug development of novel, long-acting treatments requires consideration of specific clinical trial design aspects, including safety collection, benefit: risk assessment, the development and assessment of novel, qualitative surrogate end points, such as time-in-therapeutic range, the use of representative trial settings as well as the definition of standard of care in placebo-controlled trials, which should be of reasonably high-quality allowing for credible evaluation of effectiveness. Here, we provide an overview on barriers to effective treatment and a framework for trials assessing novel treatments for cardiovascular disease risk factors, including early and broad implementation programs.