Citations

BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic utility of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is well established, emerging data suggest that reduced subendocardial flows also predict adverse outcomes. However, the incremental value of subendocardial MFR (MFR SE ) beyond transmural MFR (MFR TM ) remains unclear. METHODS: We studied patients in a multicenter PET registry with normal perfusion on stress/rest Rb-82 PET, excluding those with a previous history of coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplantation, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. The optimal MFR SE cutoff for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction [MI], revascularization, or heart failure [HF] hospitalization) was determined using Youden’s index. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: concordant-normal (MFR TM ≥2.0; MFR SE ≥2.1), discordant (low-MFR SE , normal MFR TM ), and abnormal MFR TM . Clinical outcomes were compared by MFR groups. RESULTS: Among 6603 patients (normal N=4103; discordant N=885; abnormal N=1615) the mean age was 66.3±12.4 years, and 54% were women. Compared with the concordant-normal group, patients with discordant low-MFR SE were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention. The median MFR TM for normal, discordant, and abnormal groups were 2.86, 2.15, and 1.72, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 1661 MACE events occurred. Discordant low-MFR SE patients had a higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14–1.61) compared with concordant-normal patients. The discordant group had an intermediate absolute risk of MACE, with an adjusted annualized event rate of 5.79% (95% CI, 5.10–6.49) compared with 3.99% (95% CI, 3.67–4.30; P <0.001) in the concordant-normal group and 8.35% (95% CI, 7.71–9.00; P <0.001) in the abnormal MFR TM group. CONCLUSIONS: Subendocardial MFR reveals clinically meaningful risk heterogeneity among patients with preserved transmural flow reserve, helping refine risk stratification beyond traditional PET metrics.

Abstract Aims Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with mechanical dyssynchrony, heterogeneous perfusion, and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling. However, not all patients with LBBB develop cardiomyopathy, and dyssynchrony can occur without conduction defects. The role of microvascular dysfunction remains uncertain. We aimed to assess how mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity relate to LV remodelling and function in patients with and without LBBB. Methods and results We analysed 233 patients with LBBB and 932 matched controls who underwent PET myocardial perfusion imaging, assessing mechanical dyssynchrony (phase entropy), LV volumes, and ejection fraction (EF); coronary vascular resistance (CVR), myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) as markers of microvascular function; and septal-to-lateral MBF ratio (SLR) as a measure of regional perfusion heterogeneity. Compared with controls, LBBB patients had greater dyssynchrony (56% vs. 40%), larger LV volumes, and lower EF (54% vs. 67%) (all P &lt; 0.001), as well as higher stress CVR (37 vs. 34 mmHg/mL·min−1·g−1), and lower MBF (2.4 vs. 2.6 mL/min/g), MFR (2.4 vs. 2.6), and SLR (0.95 vs. 1.00) (all P &lt; 0.05). Among patients with dyssynchrony, SLR &lt;1.0 identified greater remodelling. In multivariable regression, phase entropy and SLR independently predicted LV volumes and EF, with adverse effects of SLR reduction amplified in LBBB (interaction P &lt; 0.01). In Cox analysis, phase entropy (HR:1.02, P = 0.01), MFR (HR:0.62, P &lt; 0.001), and LVEF (HR:0.97, P &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with death or heart failure hospitalization, whereas LBBB was not. Conclusion Mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity independently predict adverse LV remodelling, irrespective of LBBB. Integrated imaging improves cardiomyopathy stratification.

Abstract Background Nearly 40,000 people in the U.S. experience recurrent pericarditis with up to 90% of cases having no identifiable cause, often making the journey to diagnosis arduous. Understanding the challenges that patients and health care professionals (HCP) face will help address gaps and barriers in patient diagnosis and care. In addition, the lack of U.S. based guidelines for recurrent pericarditis clinical care, coupled with the time lapse from the last published European guideline, has created an opportunity to discover workflow solutions for U.S. based healthcare professionals. Purpose The American Heart Association’s (AHA) Addressing Recurrent Pericarditis Initiative is a three-year effort utilizing a quality improvement approach to address gaps/barriers in patient care, educate HCPs, and develop patient education resources to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life. To accomplish this, the lived experiences and challenges patients face on their journey to diagnosis was integrated into the qualitative research process. Methods To assess quality improvement opportunities, the AHA engaged HCPs with recurrent pericarditis experience from 15 diverse health systems to participate in a learning collaborative strategy for quality improvement and implementation to share successful strategies, provide input on professional education topics, and participate in process mapping. Data collection strategies include 1:1 consultations, quarterly learning collaborative calls, surveys and questionnaire completion. To assess patient education needs, the AHA Market Research Team held 1-hour video interviews with ten diverse patients. Results AHA-led HCP interviews produced process maps of clinical workflows and identified opportunities for standardization to improve clinical workflow and patient outcomes (Figure 1). From these data collection methods, preliminary results include care coordination across clinical settings, exploring treatment options, standardization of follow-up cadence, and provider awareness of misdiagnoses/underdiagnosis rates. The patient interviews revealed that there is a lack of symptom recognition, persistent rate of misdiagnosis, delay in accurate diagnosis and treatment, and discrepancies in diagnosis and treatment for various demographics including female and younger adult patients (Figure 2). Conclusion(s) In Year 2 of this three-year initiative, we will continue to refine identified areas of opportunities to improve patient outcomes by creating and disseminating educational materials and launch awareness campaigns, while also producing a national education series for HCPs that provide guidance for system-level quality improvement to emphasize consistency in care and reductions in health inequities. Key findings from this study highlight the care coordination involved in the treatment of patients with recurrent pericarditis and the need to provide multidiscipline educational approaches to achieve this goal.Figure. 1 Summary of care pathway Figure. 2 Summary of patient interviews

Abstract Aims Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with mechanical dyssynchrony, heterogeneous perfusion, and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, not all patients with LBBB develop cardiomyopathy, and dyssynchrony can occur without conduction defects. The role of microvascular dysfunction remains uncertain. We aimed to assess how mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity relate to LV remodeling and function in patients with and without LBBB. Methods and results We retrospectively analyzed 233 patients with isolated LBBB and 932 matched controls who underwent PET myocardial perfusion imaging, assessing mechanical dyssynchrony (phase entropy), myocardial blood flow (MBF), coronary vascular resistance (CVR), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), septal-to-lateral MBF ratio (SLR) for perfusion heterogeneity, LV volumes, and ejection fraction (EF). Compared to controls, patients with LBBB had greater dyssynchrony (56% vs. 40%), larger LV volumes, and lower EF (54% vs. 67%) (all p <0.001), and had higher stress CVR (37 vs. 34 mmHg/mL·min⁻¹·g⁻¹), lower stress MBF (2.4 vs. 2.6 mL/min/g), reduced MFR (2.4 vs. 2.6), and lower SLR (0.95 vs. 1.00) (all p <0.05). Among patients with dyssynchrony, SLR<1.0 identified those with more adverse remodeling. In multivariable regression, phase entropy and SLR independently predicted LV volumes and EF, with adverse effects of SLR reduction amplified in LBBB (interaction p <0.01). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, phase entropy (HR:1.02, p =0.01), MFR (HR:0.62, p <0.001), and LVEF (HR:0.97, p <0.001) were independently associated with mortality and heart failure hospitalization, whereas LBBB was not. Conclusions Mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity independently predict adverse LV remodeling, irrespective of LBBB. Integrated imaging enhances cardiomyopathy stratification.

ABSTRACT Introduction Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a robust indicator of coronary vascular health and a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Clinical guidelines typically use fixed MFR thresholds (e.g., <2.0) to stratify risk, yet this approach overlooks individual variation, particularly by age and sex. We aimed to establish age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles and to evaluate their prognostic and predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment, in comparison with conventional fixed-threshold MFR approach. Methods Using data from the REFINE PET registry (24,820 patients from 12 sites), we measured PET MFR and derived age- and sex-adjusted MFR reference percentiles using quantile regression in patients without known coronary artery disease. All patients were categorized into percentile-based quartile groups. The primary outcome for prognostic and prediction analyses was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or heart-failure hospitalization. Time-to-event associations were evaluated using covariate-adjusted survival models, with cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HR) estimated at 1 and 5 years in the derivation dataset, an independent but similar validation dataset A, and a high-risk validation dataset B. Predictive performance for MACE was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and reclassification metrics, comparing percentile-based models with models using a fixed MFR threshold (<2.0). Results Among participants (mean age 66.5 years; median follow-up 3.6 years), age- and sex-adjusted MFR quartile groups were strong independent predictors of MACE, with adjusted HR increasing stepwise across quartile groups at both early and later follow-up. At 1 year, HR (95% CI) comparing the lowest to the highest quartile group were 4.06 (3.41–4.82) in the derivation cohort, 3.31 (2.32–4.71) in validation cohort A, and 2.35 (2.05–2.70) in validation cohort B. At 5 years, the corresponding HR were 2.18 (1.86–2.56), 1.77 (1.31–2.40), and 1.59 (1.36–1.86). Percentile-based models demonstrated consistently higher discrimination, better calibration, and greater net reclassification for MACE at both time points compared with fixed-threshold MFR models. Although 67.2% of patients had preserved MFR (>2.0), cardiovascular risk increased steadily across MFR percentiles even within this range. Conclusion Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What is new? In a large, multinational real-world registry of more than 24,000 patients undergoing PET MPI, we derived age- and sex-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (MFR) percentiles, establishing a lifespan-based reference framework with age-specific reference values. Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles showed a strong, graded association with 1- and 5-year cardiovascular risk and demonstrated improved prognostic and predictive performance compared with fixed MFR thresholds and models without MFR across independent derivation and validation datasets, including a higher-risk cohort. Lower adjusted MFR percentiles were consistently associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart-failure hospitalization. What are the clinical implications? Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a personalized, dynamic measure of coronary vascular health that improves cardiovascular risk stratification by accounting for age- and sex-related heterogeneity. A percentile-based approach may help clinicians better identify patients at elevated cardiovascular risk who may warrant closer monitoring or intensified preventive strategies, while avoiding unnecessary intervention in lower-risk individuals. By integrating macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles offer a clinically interpretable marker of vascular aging that may inform future research on aging biomarkers, novel therapeutics and cardiovascular risk assessment across the spectrum of atherosclerotic and microvascular disease.

Patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are at significantly increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease, attributed to chronic systemic inflammation and a high burden of cardiometabolic comorbidities. Despite this, CV risk factors in this population are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This consensus document, developed by the Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Clinics Multicenter Advancement Network (PPACMAN), provides practical recommendations for dermatologists, rheumatologists, and primary care physicians to improve CV risk assessment and management in PsO and PsA. Key recommendations include conducting baseline CV risk assessments at diagnosis—particularly for patients with moderate-to-severe PsO, PsA, or those requiring biologic therapy—and routine screening for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. The use of biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipoprotein(a) may help refine risk stratification. Patients at elevated risk should be referred to their primary care provider or a cardiologist for further evaluation and may require additional imaging, including coronary artery calcium scoring. Lifestyle counseling on diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation is essential. Pharmacologic strategies, such as earlier initiation of statins and consideration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are encouraged when clinically appropriate. Systemic inflammation should be reduced using anti-inflammatory therapies, although outcome data remain mixed. Clinicians must carefully assess the risks and benefits of NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. This document aims to bridge existing gaps in interdisciplinary care and facilitate earlier, more aggressive CV risk management in psoriatic disease, aligning with current cardiology and dermatology guidelines to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease mediated by IL-1 that requires long-term treatment. While the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines position IL-1 pathway inhibition only after corticosteroids, complications associated with long-term steroid use underscore the importance of steroid-sparing strategies. Rilonacept, an IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap, is the only FDA-approved treatment for RP (available since April 2021). RESONANCE, an ongoing 5-year non-interventional US registry of patients (pts) with RP, has collected real-world data from pts cared for by cardiologists with a focus on pericardial disease, with a goal of informing contemporary RP clinical management. Purpose Analysis of temporal trends in RP management from RESONANCE. Methods From a database cut-off (DCO) on 21 December 2023, patient demographics and disease characteristics are reported for 242 active RP pts (excluding RHAPSODY prior participants) at 20 US sites (median [Q1:Q3] 2.1 [1.5:2.6] years and 556 patient-years [PY] of observation). Complete medication class use data were available for 239 pts (total 546 PY). Proportional medication class use prior to initiating rilonacept was analyzed annually across the observation period. Results Mean (standard deviation) age at DCO was 50.2 (16.6) years; 58.1% were female. Median [Q1:Q3] disease duration at DCO from index pericarditis episode was 3.1 [2.2:5] years. Median [Q1:Q3] number of prior recurrences at enrollment was 3 [2:5]. Prior to rilonacept availability, NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin represented the highest proportion of treatment (73% of PY); steroid use was 9% of PY, IL-1 pathway inhibition (anakinra) was 13% of PY, and conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were 0.46% PY (no RP-specific treatment was 5% of PY) (Fig 1). In the years since rilonacept availability, proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use has increased, from 13% of PY in 2020-21 to 26% of PY in 2023, driven by an increase in rilonacept use (6%, 13%, 16% of PY in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively). Over that same period, proportional NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin use (57%-63% of PY) has been consistently 6-times more than proportional steroid use (10%-11% of PY). Among pts who initiated rilonacept (n=81), similar proportions transitioned from NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin as from corticosteroids (Fig 2), a robust trend observed each year. Of those pts transitioning from corticosteroids, 1/3 had used corticosteroids for &lt;30 days and 1/3 for &gt;6 months. Conclusions Real-world data from the RESONANCE registry reveal a temporal shift in RP management in US centers with RP-focused cardiologists, with increased proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use since rilonacept availability in 2021. Advancing beyond 2015 guideline recommendations, IL-1 pathway inhibition is often being used as steroid-sparing treatment, i.e., after colchicine instead of chronic corticosteroids.