Citations

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at 2 tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). A total of 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression, and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2%–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 74.4%, 59.8% and 57.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved a 5-year OS of 82.4%. Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

PURPOSE Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR, MSI-H) in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is observed in 1%-5% of tumors. MSI-H across solid tumors has demonstrated durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) regardless of the anatomic location. Here, we describe clinical outcomes and surgical conversion of MSI-H BTC treated with ICIs. Patients and Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of BTC patients with dMMR/MSI-H between 2017 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan, and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. Outcomes of interest were surgical resection rate, rate of pathologic response, 2-year overall survival (OS; time from initiation of treatment to death/last follow-up), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD; time from initiation of treatment to cessation because of any cause). Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS Thirty patients with MSI-H BTC were identified: 19 with cholangiocarcinoma, three with gallbladder cancer, and 8 with BTC undefined. The median age at diagnosis was 61.5 years (range, 26-86). Twenty-six (86.7%) patients had advanced stage at diagnosis. Twenty-seven patients (90%) received first-line systemic therapy, and 13 (48.1%) continued onto second line. Six patients (23.1%) were restaged to resectable from advanced disease after ICI therapy and underwent resection; all remained recurrence-free at last follow-up. Of these six patients, 3 (50%) achieved a pathologic complete response. Among those receiving first-line therapy, the median TTD was 9.9 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 14.5 months) and the 2-year OS was 73% (95% CI, 56% to 94%). CONCLUSION ICI therapy in patients with MSI-H BTC demonstrated durable response and downstaged some BTC to a resectable stage. dMMR/MSI-H should be performed up-front to guide treatment decisions.

Abstract Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is associated with advanced neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) and may preclude surgical cytoreduction. We assessed perioperative and long‐term outcomes of hepatectomy in patients with CHD. We retrospectively analyzed 311 patients undergoing cytoreductive hepatectomy for intestinal NETLM: non‐functional ( n = 163), carcinoid syndrome (CS) without CHD ( n = 110), and CHD ( n = 38), including patients undergoing pre‐hepatectomy valve replacement. CHD patients more frequently had >10 liver metastases (78%) and larger lesions (median 9.5 cm) and required major hepatectomy more often (58%). Major morbidity was higher in CHD (up to 47%), yet 90‐day mortality remained low (≤4%). Median overall survival after hepatectomy was comparable across groups (12.5 vs. 9.1 vs. 11.4 years; p = .19), including matched analyses. With optimal cardiac management, cytoreductive hepatectomy in CHD is feasible and provides long‐term survival comparable to patients without CHD.

Pharmacological plasminogen reduction enhanced liver regeneration experimentally and clinically. siRNA-induced plasminogen deficiency promoted hepatocyte proliferation after partial hepatectomy in mice, contrasting genetic deficiency models. In the HeLiX trial, tranexamic acid reduced post-hepatectomy liver failure odds, suggesting a novel therapeutic strategy.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Occult intra‐abdominal metastases are identified in approximately 20% of patients with radiographically localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) through staging laparoscopy, as peritoneal cytology is limited in sensitivity. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for PDAC in tumor tissue, blood, and pancreatic secretions. This study assesses the feasibility and diagnostic performance of MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid collected during staging laparoscopy, comparing their performance to mutant KRAS (m KRAS ) detection. Methods DNA from peritoneal lavage fluid of PDAC patients was analyzed for m KRAS mutations (codons 12, 13, and 61) using droplet‐digital PCR and for 13 MDMs and a reference gene (B3GALT6) using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. An MDM score was generated from the average signal of the 13 MDMs and evaluated for its ability to detect intra‐abdominal metastases via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Among 48 patients, 15 (31%) had intra‐abdominal metastases. The MDM score showed 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.98), outperforming m KRAS , which showed 40% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Conclusions MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid may enable highly accurate molecular staging of PDAC and warrant validation in larger studies.

Background: Upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is defined by the NCCN as disease with ≤180° portomesenteric vein (PMV) abutment. However, the clinical significance of PMV abutment in this cohort remains unexplored, and we sought to investigate its impact. Methods: This multi-institutional study included patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for upfront resectable PDAC from 2002 to 2023. Patients with PDAC with ≤180° PMV abutment were compared with those without. Overall survival (OS) was compared and stratified based on whether patients underwent upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Results: Among 1,446 patients included, 521 (36.0%) had PMV abutment. Median OS for patients with PMV abutment was 28.8 months compared with 31.2 months for those without ( P =.17). In a stratified analysis of patients who underwent upfront surgery, patients with PMV abutment had worse OS (19.2 vs 27.6 months; P <.05) and lower R0 resection rates (63.1% vs 87.2%; P <.05) compared with those without. However, in patients who underwent NAT, this difference in R0 resection rate was not observed (91.4% vs 94.0%, respectively; P =.27). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in median OS with NAT (42.5 vs 51.6 months, respectively; P =.48). Conclusions: In this largest cohort to date of patients with upfront resectable PDAC, PMV abutment was associated with worse OS compared with no PMV abutment when an upfront resection strategy was used. The use of NAT in patients with PMV abutment mitigated this survival difference with increased R0 resection rates. These findings suggest that patients with upfront resectable PDAC with PMV abutment benefit from a NAT approach for optimal survival outcomes, and that the current criteria guidelines need to be redefined.

BACKGROUND: The first total pancreatectomy (TP) resulting in survival past the immediate postoperative period was performed at Mayo Clinic in 1944. Although still uncommonly performed, indications have recently fluctuated. We aimed to evaluate trends in TP use and outcomes over four decades. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent single-stage TP at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1988 to 2024 were analyzed in two cohorts: early era (EE, 1988 to 2009) and modern era (ME, 2010 to 2024). RESULTS: In total, 437 patients were identified: 118 during EE (mean 8 per year) and 319 during ME (mean 21 per year). Primary indications were adenocarcinoma (42% EE vs 60% ME), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (31% EE vs 17% ME), and chronic pancreatitis (11% EE vs 13% ME; p < 0.001). Concurrent vascular resection was performed in 9.3% (EE; all venous only) vs 53% (ME; venous alone in 20% and arterial with or without venous in 33%; p < 0.001). Multivisceral resection was performed in <1% (EE) vs 24% (ME; p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 13% (EE) vs 27% (ME; p = 0.018), and 90-day mortality was 3.4% (EE) vs 6.3% (ME; p = 0.35). For adenocarcinoma, 5-year median overall survival from both surgery and diagnosis was significantly improved in ME (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). Median last HbA1c was 7.7 (EE) vs 7.3 (ME; p < 0.001). Among patients surviving more than 1 year, insulin pumps were used in 12% (EE) vs 49% (ME; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of TP has dramatically increased in recent years, primarily for adenocarcinoma alongside increased use of neoadjuvant therapy and ever-expanding criteria for anatomic resectability. Operative complexity has significantly increased with resultant increased perioperative morbidity. TP remains a higher-risk procedure, specifically with en bloc vascular resections, emphasizing the importance of appropriate patient selection, preoperative patient education, and thoughtful postoperative and long-term management.

Abstract Importance and Objective Pancreatic cancer can lead to severe stenosis of the portomesenteric venous (PV/SMV) confluence due to extrinsic compression or direct invasion. This can result in venous hypertension associated with post-prandial abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. In patients with unresectable tumors, transhepatic PV/SMV stenting has been reported; however, its safety and efficacy are poorly understood. Design, Setting and Participants All unresectable pancreatic cancer patients referred to Interventional Radiology to undergo palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting (2011–2024) were collected. Patient demographics, CT scans, transhepatic venograms, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Intervention, Main Outcomes and Results In total, 129 patients were included; 92% had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumors were unresectable due to unreconstructable vascular involvement, metastatic disease, or poor performance status. Nearly 81% were symptomatic, while the remaining 24 asymptomatic patients presented with significant venous hypertensive varices and collaterals on imaging. Complete venous occlusion was seen in 39% of patients at the PV, the SMV, or the PV/SMV confluence; 97% of procedures were successful, with 4 technical failures at obtaining distal venous wire access. Adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Radiological follow-up was available in 94% of patients. Post-procedural primary stent patency was 80% at a median follow-up time of 20 months. Follow-up was available in 102 of the 105 symptomatic patients, with 85% reporting an improvement in symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance Palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting is a technically feasible and safe procedure in well-selected patients. Symptoms improvement can be seen in most patients. High-volume centers should consider this technique for patients with unresectable tumors who present with symptomatic stenosis or short segment occlusion.