Citations

Abstract Introduction Ultrasonic vaping devices like SURGE are marketed as safer alternatives to conventional coil-based electronic cigarettes like JUUL due to their lower operating temperatures. However, their impact on cardiovascular health has not been fully characterized. Methods Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed daily for 9 weeks to aerosol generated from SURGE, JUUL, or clean air. Heart rate variability was continuously monitored via implanted telemetry. Cardiac fibrosis was quantified using histological analysis. Temperature profiles of SURGE, JUUL, and Nautilus (a coil-based tank device) were recorded. Aerosol samples were analyzed for carbonyl compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results Both SURGE and JUUL exposures significantly reduced heart rate variability (high frequency and total power) compared with air. JUUL exposure significantly increased cardiac fibrosis; SURGE showed a similar mean fibrosis level but greater variability, resulting in a non-significant difference. SURGE devices operated at lower peak temperatures (~131°C) than JUUL (~239°C) and Nautilus (~160–170°C). Despite having the lowest temperature, SURGE emitted higher levels of carbonyl compounds than JUUL, although still substantially lower than Nautilus. Conclusions Although SURGE operates without coils and at lower temperatures than coiled vaping devices, it generates higher levels of carbonyls than some coiled devices and impairs cardiac autonomic regulation, and it can cause cardiac fibrosis comparable with JUUL although with high variability; that is, SURGE does not reliably avoid the increase in fibrosis caused by conventional electronic cigarettes. These findings suggest that non-thermal mechanisms predominate in mediating cardiovascular toxicity associated with ultrasonic vaping, challenging the assumption that coil-free designs are inherently safer. Implications Despite its lower operating temperature and coil-free design, the SURGE ultrasonic vaping device impaired cardiac autonomic function and promoted fibrosis at a mean level comparable to that of JUUL. These findings challenge claims of reduced harm from coil-less vaping technologies and suggest that non-thermal mechanisms may drive toxicity. Regulatory evaluations should consider device emissions and physiological outcomes—not just hardware features. Physicians and policymakers should be aware that coil-less systems may still pose cardiovascular risks, and marketing these devices as inherently safer may mislead users and undermine tobacco harm reduction efforts.

SummaryBackgroundRacial and ethnic disparities exist for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival.AimTo evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on such disparities.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we analysed 6069 patients with HCV‐related HCC (54.2% Asian, 30.1% White, 8.5% Black, and 7.3% Hispanic) from centres in the United States and Asia.ResultsThe mean age was 61, 60, 59 and 68, respectively, for White, Black, Hispanic and Asian patients. Black patients were most likely to have Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage D, vascular invasion and distant metastasis (23% vs. 5%–15%, 20% vs. 10%–17% and 10% vs. 5%–7%, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Treatment rate with direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) was 35.9% for Asian, 34.9% for White, 30.3% for Hispanic (30.3%), and 18.7% for Black patients (p < 0.0001). Among those untreated or without sustained virologic response (SVR), 10‐year survival rates were 35.4, 27.5, 19.3 and 14.0, respectively, for Asian, Hispanic, White and Black patients (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences among those with SVR (p = 0.44). On multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant confounders, there was no statistically significant association between survival and being Hispanic (aHR: 0.68, p = 0.26) or Black (aHR: 1.18, p = 0.60) versus White. There was a significant association between being Asian American and survival (aHR: 0.24, p = 0.001; non‐U.S. Asian: aHR: 0.66, p = 0.05), and for SVR (aHR: 0.30, p < 0.0001).ConclusionDAA treatment rates were suboptimal. Racial and ethnic disparities resolved with HCV cure. Early diagnosis and improved access to HCV treatment is needed for all patients with HCV infection.