Citations

Abstract Background: Hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (HNP) is a highly lethal form of pancreatitis that lacks mechanism-based therapy. Intra-acinar enzyme activation is fundamental to pancreatitis initiation, yet it does not explain why only a subset of episodes progress to catastrophic hemorrhagic necrosis. Objective: To identify determinants of progression to lethal HNP and test a mechanism-based preventive intervention. Design: Using humanized trypsinogen mouse models and secretagogue regimens, we compared high-dose cerulein with low/moderate-dose cerulein and bombesin. We quantified pancreatic protease activity, performed blinded histopathologic scoring, assessed hemorrhage/vascular disruption, and evaluated enzyme localization and ductal injury by PRSS1 immunostaining. De-identified human pancreatic histology from HNP were examined. We tested a repurposed strategy using clinically approved agents for other indications: secretin to stimulate ductal fluid secretion and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) to promote ductal outflow via sphincter of Oddi relaxation. Results: High-dose cerulein induced robust intrapancreatic protease activation but predominantly caused edematous pancreatitis. Paradoxically, bombesin and low/moderate-dose cerulein elicited lower total pancreatic protease activity yet produced severe, frequently lethal HNP with vascular disruption and lobular ischemic necrosis. HNP was associated with intraductal enzyme accumulation and ductal injury. Secretin or ISMN alone showed limited protection, whereas combined secretin+ISMN prevented hemorrhagic necrotizing injury. Conclusion: Pancreatitis severity is determined not only by the magnitude of enzyme activation but also by where enzyme activity is exerted, implicating intraductal enzyme accumulation as a mechanistic determinant and therapeutic target in HNP. Coordinated enhancement of ductal secretion and outflow with clinically approved agents prevents HNP in vivo, supporting a translatable prevention strategy.

ABSTRACTTissue‐specific gene manipulation using Cre/loxP or Flp/frt recombination systems is a cornerstone of genetically engineered mouse models. In this study, we aim to develop a novel hepatocyte‐specific, tamoxifen‐inducible Flp mouse line. BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome)‐Alb(albumin)‐FlpER2(estrogen receptor ligan binding domain) was developed by inserting IRES‐FlpER2 cDNA between the translation stop codon and 3′‐UTR of the mouse albumin gene in a bacterial artificial chromosome. Upon tamoxifen induction in mice crossed with reporter lines, western blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence staining, and X‐gal staining (5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl‐β‐D‐galactopyranoside Staining) were used to verify the recombination efficiency and specificity of this mouse model. Recombination was highly efficient and specific in hepatocytes, with no recombination detected in intrahepatic cholangiocytes or other organs in this mouse model. We generated a new tamoxifen‐induced hepatocyte‐specific mouse model with highly efficient recombination specifically in hepatocytes, and this model can be used to generate tumor model lines.

AbstractA deeper understanding of pathophysiology, from the initiation of tumors of epithelial cells to the outcomes associated with it, is imperative to test potential interventions for these diseases. However, few models can accomplish this because of the complexity of origin cells and their transformation. We established an epithelial cell original tumor mouse model by conditional KrasG12D activation and tumor suppressor gene p53 deletion specifically in epithelial cells of the whole body using Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) promoter via Cre‐ERT mediation. Multiple tumors derived from epithelial cells developed in this novel model. This model can recapitulate the progress of intestinal, pancreatic, liver, lung, and subcutaneous tumors which derive from epithelial cells. This model is suitable for studying the pathophysiology of tumors derived from epithelial cells and may have the potential to test interventions.

Introduction: The prognosis for CLL/SLL has improved with the advent of novel therapeutic classes, including BTKis. While comparative data for several BTKis have been published, there are limited data on patient preferences in BTKi treatment selection. Understanding and integrating patient perspective in the BTKi treatment selection process is crucial to shared decision-making and attaining optimal treatment outcomes. To understand patients' priorities for different treatment attributes that impact their treatment decisions, a comprehensive quantitative analysis of patient preferences on BTKi treatment attributes was conducted. Methods: A patient survey with a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) design was conducted from March to June 2024 among USA adults (≥18 years) with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL, recruited through online patient panels, physician referrals, and support groups. BTKi treatment attributes were selected based on results of a targeted literature review and clinical inputs. Patients responded to DCE questions on attributes related to efficacy, safety (eg, impacts of diarrhea, headache, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension on quality of life [QoL]), formulation type, and dosing frequency. The impact of adverse events (AEs) on QoL was defined as the extent to which AEs caused interruptions in patients' ability to engage in their usual day-to-day activities. A conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate the relative importance of each attribute, as well as patient willingness to trade off specified BTKi treatment attributes. Results: A total of 200 patients with CLL/SLL completed the survey (median age: 61 years; 78% White; 55% female; 60% commercially insured; 82% suburban/urban residence). Less than half (43%) were diagnosed ≥5 years ago, and 61% received ≥3 lines of therapy. Almost all (89%) patients reported having experienced ≥1 AE from treatment previously, with the most common AEs being fatigue (76%), diarrhea (51%), headache (51%), and nausea and/or vomiting (51%). When considering the importance of efficacy measures, most patients prioritized CLL/SLL treatments that extended life expectancy (93%), followed by those that increased the likelihood of remission or cure (84%) and those that paused the progression of disease (67%). Patients preferred treatments with higher efficacy, less impact of AEs on QoL, and lower dosing frequency (P<.001). The top 3 treatment attributes with the highest relative importance to patients were impact of atrial fibrillation on QoL (24%), progression-free survival (PFS; 19%), and impact of headache on QoL (18%), followed by impact of diarrhea (14%) and hypertension (14%) on QoL, dosing frequency (9%), and formulation type (3%). On average, patients were willing to accept a reduction of 2.6, 1.9, 1.4, and 1.4 years of PFS to receive a treatment with less (none or mild vs significant) impact of atrial fibrillation, headache, diarrhea, and hypertension on QoL, respectively. Patients were willing to accept a reduction of 1.0 year of PFS to receive once-daily vs twice-daily treatment. Conclusions: Findings from this patient preference survey suggested that impact of atrial fibrillation on QoL, PFS, and impact of headache on QoL were the most important attributes of BTKi treatment for patients with CLL/SLL in the USA. Shared decision-making in CLL/SLL treatment selection should include an informed discussion about AEs, as besides efficacy comparisons, patients may prefer treatments with less impact of AEs on their QoL. Future prospective studies evaluating the effects of shared treatment decision-making on treatment adherence and outcomes are needed to better understand their impact on CLL/SLL patient care and inform clinical practice.