Citations

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Cancer (CoC) implemented 6 operative standards to reduce technical variation in cancer surgery. Although designed to guide surgeons in performing key oncologic techniques, these standards also provide a framework for teaching high-quality cancer surgery to trainees. We assessed surgical trainees’ familiarity with the CoC Operative Standards and the underlying principles of cancer surgery to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities for improved education. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons Cancer Surgery Standards Program distributed an anonymous survey to general surgery residents and surgical fellows across the US. Questions addressed the CoC Operative Standards and cancer surgery principles, with scores calculated on the basis of correctness. Univariate logistic regression evaluated associations between trainee or program characteristics and knowledge. Trainees were also asked about their role in procedural documentation, given the synoptic operative report requirements of the standards. RESULTS: A total of 244 surveys were completed by 205 residents and 39 fellows. Fellows reported greater familiarity with the CoC Operative Standards (68% vs 24%, p < 0.001). Only 30% of trainees reported receiving a formal curriculum on the standards. Correct response rates were 30% for CoC Operative Standards questions vs 50% for cancer surgery principles, with minimal association between knowledge and trainee or program characteristics. Most residents (71%) reported contributing to operative documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees demonstrated limited knowledge of the CoC Operative Standards, highlighting the need for multifaceted educational strategies at the national and institutional levels. Incorporating education about the CoC Operative Standards into surgical training can help emphasize the importance of performing and documenting critical elements of cancer operations.

Abstract Disclosure: B. Salama: None. O. Hamidi: None. T.S. Wang: None. A. Sada: None. M.A. Habra: None. P. Dogra: None. A.P. Dackiw: None. S.C. Oltmann: None. S. Mirfakhraee: None. I. Lingvay: None. T. Mckenzie: None. T. Foster: None. M. Lyden: None. B. Dy: None. V. Balderrama Brondani: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) are at risk for adrenal insufficiency (AI) after unilateral adrenalectomy. Guidelines recommend initiating glucocorticoid replacement post-adrenalectomy. However, identifying patients at risk and accurately diagnosing AI can enable individualized management. Objectives: Determine the prevalence, duration and predictors of postoperative AI after unilateral adrenalectomy for MACS and compare baseline and peak cortisol post cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) In diagnosing AI. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with MACS who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy and post-operative CST evaluation between January 1, 2013, and August 31, 2024. MACS was defined as cortisol &gt;1.8 mcg/dL following overnight administration of 1 mg dexamethasone (DST-cortisol). AI was diagnosed when post-operative day 1 early morning baseline cortisol was &lt;10 μg/dL and/or CST peak cortisol was &lt;18 μg/dL. Baseline and peak cortisol levels were considered concordant when both met cut-offs. Biochemical (BSS) and clinical (CSS) severity scores were calculated. Results: Among 281 adults with MACS (80% women, median age 57 years, interquartile range [IQR] (47-64), the median adenoma size was 3.0 cm (IQR, 2.3-3.9), and 62 (22%) had bilateral disease. The median BSS was 4 (IQR, 3-5), and the median CSS was 6 (IQR, 2-11). Postoperative AI was diagnosed in 153 (54.5%) patients. A multivariable analysis showed that a higher BSS (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) and younger age at diagnosis (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.81), but not sex, BMI, or laterality, were associated with AI. Diagnosis of AI was concordant based on the baseline and peak CST cortisol cutoffs in 78% of patients. Diagnosis of AI was discordant in 22%: in 35 patients (12%), baseline cortisol was &lt;10 μg/dL, but CST peak cortisol was ≥18 μg/dL, and in 28 cases (10%), baseline cortisol was ≥10 μg/dL, but CST peak cortisol was &lt;18 μg/dL. Patients with bilateral MACS were more likely to have discordant results (32% vs. 19%, P &lt; 0.001). During a median postoperative follow-up period of 15.4 months, 108 patients (70.6%) recovered from AI. The median time to recovery was 3.9 months (IQR, 3-5.9), with 41% recovering by 3 months, 60% by 6 months, and 73% by 12 months. The median time to recovery was associated with baseline BSS: mild: 3 months, moderate: 4.7 months, and severe: 14.5 months. Conclusion: We found that more than half of patients with MACS develop postoperative AI, with 50% recovering by 4 months post-surgery. BSS was associated with both the development and duration of AI. Baseline and CST peak cortisol results were concordant only in 78% of patients, thus performing both should be considered for an accurate diagnosis of AI. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Context Patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) can develop adrenal insufficiency after unilateral adrenalectomy. Objective This work aimed to determine the prevalence, duration, and predictors of adrenal insufficiency, and compare postoperative basal cortisol and cosyntropin stimulation test (CST). Methods In this multicenter retrospective study of patients with MACS, adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed when postoperative basal cortisol was less than 10 µg/dL and/or CST &lt; 18 µg/dL. The results were concordant when both tests met cutoffs. Biochemical (BSS) and clinical severity scores (CSS) were calculated. Results Among 281 patients with MACS (80% women), postoperative adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed in 153 (54.5%) patients. Adrenal insufficiency inversely correlated with age (odds ratio [OR] 0.67 per 10 years; 95% CI, 0.53-0.84). Low basal cortisol and CST were associated with younger age (OR 0.64 per 10 years for both) and higher BSS (OR 1.17 and 1.22, respectively). Basal cortisol and CST were discordant in 22% of patients, and the discordance rate was more common in patients with bilateral nodules (32% vs 19%; P &lt; .001). The median time to adrenal insufficiency recovery was 3.9 months (IQR, 3-5.9 months), with longer duration associated with higher BSS and CSS: 3 months for mild, 4 to 5 months for moderate, and 12 to 14 months for severe BSS and CSS. Conclusion Approximately half of patients with MACS developed postoperative adrenal insufficiency, with 50% recovering by 3.9 months after surgery. BSS correlated with basal cortisol, CST, and duration of adrenal insufficiency. As discordant results were noted in 22%, performing both basal cortisol and CST postoperatively should be considered.

Abstract Disclosure: S.H. Johnson: None. C. Zhang: None. P.T. Hangge: None. T.W. Yen: None. T. Shaik: None. K. Doffek: None. J.W. Findling: None. T.B. Carroll: None. D.B. Evans: None. S. Dream: None. T.S. Wang: None. Background: Secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) may occur in patients after unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal-dependent hypercortisolism (HC) and/or primary aldosteronism (PA). Perioperative protocols include routine glucocorticoid replacement (GR) or selective GR based on postoperative day 1 (POD1) basal cortisol levels or cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST). This study aimed to assess if a POD1 basal cortisol level alone was predictive of an abnormal CST and the need for GR in patients following unilateral adrenalectomy for HC and/or PA. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective review of consecutive unilateral adrenalectomies performed for HC and/or PA from 9/2014-10/2022. Patients were grouped as overt hypercortisolism (OH;n=42), mild autonomous cortisol excretion (MACE;n=70), mixed PA/HC (n=22) or PA (n=73); 22 patients with PA did not have preoperative evaluation for HC. Preoperative morning cortisol after low-dose dexamethasone suppression testing (DST), was used to define MACE (1.8-4.9 µg/dL) and OH (≥5.0). POD1 CST was performed for all patients with HC and prior to 2021, all patients with PA. SAI was defined as basal cortisol ≤5 or stimulated ≤14 (≤18 before 4/2017). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of cutoffs within the range of observed basal cortisol levels in predicting an abnormal CST and need for GR. Results: Of 207 patients, 152 had POD1 CST (93% OH, 96% MACE, 73% PA/HC, 41% PA). Of these, 80 (53%) had SAI (67% OH, 55% MACE, 44% PA/HC, and 33% PA). Of the 10 patients with PA and SAI, 5 did not have preoperative testing for HC. Overall, 81 patients were discharged on GR. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of GR was 246 (127,557), 55 (38,207), 74 (16,185), and 26 (15,36) days in patients with OH, MACE, PA/HC, and PA, respectively. At a median follow-up of 142 days (IQR 42,617), 12 patients (5 OH, 6 MACE, 1 PA/HC) remained on GR. The SN/SP of a basal cortisol ≤10 in predicting GR was 92%/77% in patients with OH and 94%/73% of patients with MACE. Compared to initiation of GR based on basal cortisol ≤10, CST identified 4 patients with SAI in the combined OH and MACE cohorts who would not have received GR, and 11 in the combined cohort who did not require GR. For patients with PA and PA/HC, a basal cortisol ≤10 had SN of 100% and SP of 85% and 67%, respectively. The optimal basal cortisol for predicting SAI in patients with PA/HC was ≤5 (SN,SP 100%). Area under the curve for all ROC curves was &gt;0.9. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that in patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for HC, PA, or mixed PA/HC, POD1 CST improved identification of patients at risk for SAI compared to basal cortisol levels alone. While basal cortisol levels alone may be considered in patients with PA or mixed HC/PA, all other patients with HC should have POD1 CST to determine need for postoperative GR. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Introduction: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays were first approved for use in the U.S. in 2017. They are the guideline preferred biomarker to evaluate patients with acute chest pain. Few data exist regarding implementation of hs-cTn assays in the U.S. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that use of hs-cTn assays has increased over time and that patients assessed with hs-cTn have a shorter length of stay (LOS) and similar use of cardiac testing. Methods: We examined trends in implementation of hs-cTn assays among participating hospitals in the NCDR Chest Pain MI Registry from 1/1/2019 through 9/30/2021. Excluding STEMI patients, associations between hs-cTn use, in-hospital diagnostic imaging, and patient outcomes were assessed using logistic or negative binomial regression models. Results: Among 550 participating hospitals with 251,000 patients in the registry, implementation of hs-cTn assays increased from 3.3% in Q1, 2019 to 32.6% in Q3, 2021 (P trend <0.0001; Figure ). Implementation was similar by hospital size, type, and geographic location. hs-cTn use was associated with more echocardiography among patients with NSTE-ACS (82% vs. 75%; aOR: 1.43, 95% CI, 1.19-1.73) but not in low-risk chest pain. hs-cTn use was associated with decreased odds of invasive coronary angiography in low-risk patients (3.7% vs. 4.5%; aOR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.92) but similar use in NSTE-ACS. There was no association between hs-cTn use and non-invasive stress/CTCA testing. Among NSTE-ACS patients, hs-cTn use was not associated with PCI, CABG, or in-hospital mortality. Use of hs-cTn was associated with shorter LOS (47.6 hours vs. 48 hours; IRR: 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Conclusions: Although implementation of hs-cTn among U.S. hospitals is increasing, most U.S hospitals continue to use less-sensitive troponin assays. hs-cTn use was associated with shorter LOS overall, greater use of echocardiography in NSTE-ACS, and lower use of invasive angiograms in low-risk patients.

Background: While lack of insurance is known to be associated with worse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI), it is unknown whether health insurance status is associated with rates of non-elective hospitalizations after MI. Methods: Using data on 3571 U.S. MI patients enrolled between April 2005 to December 2008 in the 24-center, prospective TRIUMPH registry, we examined the association between being insured (reference), underinsured, and uninsured on rates of non-elective readmissions (all-cause) in the 1 st year following MI. Insurance status was obtained from medical records, and underinsurance was defined as those patients with insurance but with financial concerns about accessing care from patient interviews. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to adjust for site, demographics, MI severity, risk factors, socio-economic, and psychological factors. Results: A total of 2269 (63.5%) patients were insured; 650 (18.2%) were underinsured; and 652 (18.3%) were uninsured. Emergency readmissions were highest for uninsured patients (25.0%), followed by the underinsured (21.8%), and lowest in insured patients (19.5%) (P<.001). After multivariable adjustment, uninsured patients had significantly higher rates of emergency readmission (adjusted RR, 1.52 [95% CI: 1.22-1.90] while underinsured patients did not (adjusted RR, 0.99 [95% CI: 0.81-1.21]) (Figure). Conclusions: Uninsured patients had a significantly higher adjusted risk of non-elective readmissions after MI, while underinsured patients did not. Future studies are needed to determine if providing even modest insurance coverage to the uninsured can minimize readmission rates.

Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines departed from prior ATPIII guidelines, recommending statin treatment based on patients’ predicted 10-year ASCVD risk and de-emphasizing LDL-C targets. However, the degree to which these new guidelines have been adopted by clinicians in community practice is unknown. Methods: We surveyed 522 clinicians in 133 cardiology, primary care, and endocrinology practices participating in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry. Clinicians were asked about their likelihood of prescribing statins in 4 hypothetical patient scenarios. Results: Among responders, 79% were physicians (60% cardiologists, 38% primary care or general practice, 2% endocrinology), 18% were advanced practice providers, and 3% trainees. When queried, 73% of providers reported primarily using the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines to guide lipid management. However, only half reported “often” or “always” calculating 10-year ASCVD risk to aid lipid management decisions for primary prevention. When presented with a high 10-year ASCVD risk patient (>15%) with a high LDL-C (150 mg/dL), 92% of providers recommended statins. Similarly, 83% of providers would use statins in a diabetic patient with a LDL-C of 140 mg/dL. Yet, only 37% reported they would prescribe a statin to an older adult (age 70) for whom guidelines recommend statin based on high 10-year ASCVD risk alone (10.1%). And up to 40% would prescribe a statin to a younger (age 40) with a low 10-year risk, but a high LDL (165 mg/dL) who would not otherwise meet criteria for statin therapy under the new guidelines. Cardiologists and non-cardiologists were similarly likely prescribe statins in most scenarios with the exception of to the younger patient with elevated LDL-C were cardiologists used statins more commonly (32% vs. 42%. OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p=0.02). Conclusion: Initial survey results show that while most clinicians claim adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines, reported practices are not always adherent to these guidelines. Providers do not always calculate 10-year ASCVD risk to guide lipid management and many do not prescribe statins to patients eligible based on 10-year ASCVD risk.

Background: Prior ATPIII lipid guidelines recommended statin therapy for patients with clinical ASCVD to achieve low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, while the 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for all ASCVD patients. How closely these recommendations are followed in routine clinical practice is unknown. Methods: We evaluated statin use, intensity, and LDL-C values in 1,483 patients with ASCVD (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease) enrolled and seen serially at 62 geographically dispersed US cardiology and primary care clinics in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry between May - September 2015. Factors associated with high intensity statin use (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg daily) and LDL-C <70 mg/dL were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 1,483 ASCVD patients, 86.2% were on a statin, but only 31.4% were on a high-intensity statin. Overall, 64.0% had an LDL-C <100 mg/dL, but only 29.0% had an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Factors associated with high-intensity statin use in multivariable regression were younger age (OR 0.74 per 10 year increase, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.66-0.83), male sex (OR 1.69, p<0.001, 95% CI, 1.32-2.16), cerebrovascular disease (OR 1.55, p=0.008, 95% CI 1.12-2.13), coronary heart disease (OR 2.42, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.67-3.50), and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.35, p =0.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.81). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of LDL-C<70 were male sex (OR 1.55, p=0.001, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), white (OR 1.62, p=0.03, 95% CI 1.04-2.5-, diabetes (OR 1.64, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.29-2.09) and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.94, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.41-2.67). Discussion: Substantial gaps in care remain for secondary prevention of ASCVD despite simplified recommendations. While the majority of patients with ASCVD in community practice are on a statin, only one-third are on high intensity statins and over two-thirds have LDL ≥70 mg/dL.

AbstractBackgroundNon‐statin lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) provide additional treatment options for patients. Use patterns and patient perceptions of non‐statin LLT remain incompletely described.HypothesisThe guideline‐recommended statin intensity remains underutilized in patients treated with and without non‐statin LLT.MethodsThe PALM Registry collected LLT information on patients with or at risk of ASCVD treated at 125 US clinics in 2015. We compared patient perceptions, lipid levels and statin use among patients treated with and without non‐statin LLT.ResultsAmong 7720 patients, 1930 (25.0%) were treated with a non‐statin LLT (1249 fish oil, 417 fibrates, 329 ezetimibe, 196 niacin). Concurrent statin treatment occurred in 73.7%, of which 45.4% were dosed under the guideline‐recommended intensity. Compared with patients on statin alone, patients receiving both a statin and non‐statin LLT (n = 1423) were more likely to be male, white race and to perceive themselves as higher risk of ASCVD compared with their peers (38.5% vs. 34.9%, p = .047). Only 27.4% of patients treated with non‐statin LLT alone perceived themselves at higher risk. Most (75.7%) patients treated with a non‐statin LLT alone reported never being treated with a statin, despite ASCVD in 30.8% of these patients. Among those previously treated with a statin, 59.3% reported being willing to try a statin again.ConclusionsNon‐statin LLT is used in one in four patients with or at risk for ASCVD; its use is frequently in place of statin therapy or in the absence of guideline‐recommended statin intensity. More work is needed to establish statins as first line therapy.