Citations

Background and aims To validate the applicability of the new histological criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) proposed by the International AIH Pathology Group (IAIH‐PG) among Chinese patients with AIH and drug‐induced liver injury (DILI). Methods The gold standard for diagnosis relied on clinical response: discontinuing treatment without relapse supported DILI, while relapse or ongoing immunosuppressive treatment confirmed AIH. This two‐centre retrospective cohort study included inpatients with DILI or AIH from January 2002 to March 2023. Cases that underwent liver biopsy were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The diagnostic performance of the criteria was assessed by an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results Out of 69 patients: AIH (41, 59%) and DILI (28, 41%). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the new histological criteria for likely and possible AIH were 70%, 98% and 29%, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.8236 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7533–0.8938]. For likely AIH, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 73%, 61% and 89%, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.9177 [95% CI: 0.8757–0.9596]. Moreover, for possible AIH, significant differences were found in serum alanine aminotransferase levels [178.4 (87.0, 435.0) versus 536.5 (206.9, 930.4) U/L] and antinuclear antibody (ANA) ≥1:160 [10 (67%) versus 1 (6%)], as well as in lobular lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate [15 (100%) versus 12 (71%)] and more than mild inflammation [13 (87%)versus 6 (35%)] between AIH and DILI (all P values were <0.05). Conclusion The new histological criteria exhibit good diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing AIH from DILI in China, with high AUROC. Key discriminators include low aminotransferase, ANA ≥1:160, lobular lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and more than mild inflammation, which may further improve diagnostic accuracy for AIH.

Listing and transplanting patients with acute liver failure (ALF) is challenging, requiring rapid assessment of the likelihood of recovery. The availability of a large number of ALF liver explants, along with their clinical data, afforded an opportunity to retrospectively evaluate liver transplantation (LT) decision-making. We hypothesized that, with the benefit of hindsight, a small number of patients might have recovered without LT. Three hundred liver explants from ALF patients of varying etiologies who had undergone LT over 22 years in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group registry were reviewed for histopathological features and degree of necrosis by a committee of 8 hepatopathologists. A second committee of 8 experienced transplant hepatologists independently reviewed clinical data on these same 300 patients and retrospectively scored the likelihood that each patient required transplantation. Only 3 (1%) of those reviewed by the Clinical Committee were considered to “Definitely” not require liver grafting, while an additional 10 (3.3%) were deemed to “Possibly” not require transplantation (Not Likely Group, N=13). There was no difference in the degree of necrosis in explants in these groups, when compared to the remaining Likely Group, N=287 (95.6%), except in acetaminophen (APAP)-associated ALF, where the degree of necrosis was more uniformly graded as severe, correlating with the need for transplantation. Virtually every patient undergoing LT for ALF retrospectively appeared to need their transplant, based on expert clinical consensus review. Overall, there was poor correlation between clinical severity and apparent degree of necrosis seen in the 300 liver explants, except perhaps for APAP subjects.

Aims. To assess the utility of C4d immunohistochemistry for esophageal pemphigus vulgaris. Methods and results. We searched for patients with a history of esophageal pemphigus vulgaris who had esophageal biopsies for routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. A total of 8 biopsies from 7 patients were available. We also identified 18 non-pemphigus esophageal biopsies for controls. C4d immunohistochemistry was performed on each biopsy. Five of 6 (83%) biopsies with classic pemphigus vulgaris histologic findings were positive for intercellular staining at the basal layer. The negative biopsy was in a patient that had recently received high-dose corticosteroid treatment for a flare. Two biopsies with atypical histologic features for pemphigus vulgaris had negative C4d staining but positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies. Various nonspecific C4d staining patterns were observed in the controls, but none showed the intercellular staining pattern that was observed in pemphigus vulgaris. Conclusions. Suprabasal clefting with acantholysis and “tombstone effect” are described histologic features of pemphigus vulgaris on H&E. However, procedural artifact may mimic these findings. Currently, the gold standard for pemphigus vulgaris is DIF, which is not always available because it cannot routinely be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue. Our study shows that C4d immunohistochemistry may be a useful adjunct in evaluating esophageal pemphigus vulgaris.

Cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. Esophageal cancers are histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma, which differ in their etiology, pathology, tumor location, therapeutics, and prognosis. In contrast to esophageal adenocarcinoma, which usually affects the lower esophagus, esophageal SCC is more likely to localize at or higher than the tracheal bifurcation. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1, has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on the management of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Aims To explore the immunohistochemical utility of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and clusterin in the distinction between malignant and benign liver nodular lesions. Methods Immunohistochemical stains for PCNA, IGF2 and clusterin were performed on 284 liver nodular lesions, including 33 hepatocellular adenomas (HCA), 40 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH), 77 large regenerative nodules (LRN) and 134 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Results Strong and diffuse nuclear PCNA immunoreactivity was observed in 103 (77%) HCCs but in only 2 (6%) HCAs. None of the FNH and LRN cases showed a strong and diffuse staining pattern. All HCAs, 95% of FNHs and 92% of LRNs showed cytoplasmic IGF2 expression, with a strong staining observed in 70% of HCAs, 20% of FNHs and 30% of LRNs. This was in marked contrast to that observed in HCCs, where 66% of HCCs demonstrated a weak and focal/patchy immunostaining pattern and another 25% showed no detectable IGF2 immunoreactivity. In comparison with their adjacent non-lesional hepatocytes, 75% of HCCs showed decreased IGF2 expression. However, decreased IGF2 expression was not evident in HCAs, FNHs and LRNs. Cytoplasmic staining for clusterin was seen in both benign and malignant nodular lesions. However, an enhanced and exaggerated pericanalicular staining pattern was observed in 75% of HCCs, which was not demonstrated in HCAs, FNHs and LRNs. Conclusions PCNA, IGF2 and clusterin show unique immunostaining characteristics in HCCs, which can be useful adjuncts to other currently available markers to aid in the distinction of HCC from benign liver nodular lesions.