Citations

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Wang, Hang".

Deliberations of the Safety Task Force: Risk factors and treatment of adverse events associated with aesthetic injectables
Nikolis, Andreas , Cohen, Joel L. , Enright, Kaitlyn M. , Avelar, Luiz Eduardo Toledo , Beleznay, Katie, Biesman, Brian S. , Cartier, Hugues , Cotofana, Sebastian , Fabi, Sabrina G. , Parada, Meire Brasil, Rzany, Berthold, Wang, Hang, Bromée, Torun, Weiner, Steven C., Avelar, Luiz , Goodman, Greg , Schelke, Leonie , Cotofana, Sebastian , Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Lee, Won , Weiner, Steven

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology | August 20, 2024 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3551-3564

10.1111/jocd.16476 | PMID 39161297 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe growing popularity of aesthetic procedures involving fillers, biostimulators, and neurotoxins has prompted concerns about patient safety. To address these concerns, a global Safety Task Force (STF) was formed.AimsThe inaugural STF meeting prioritized vascular compromise prevention and management, guiding clinical trial design and materials for future meetings, and collecting data from experts on current safety methods.MethodsThe STF was formed and consisted of 16 experts from nine different countries, with each possessing distinct expertise in various fields related to aesthetic injectables. Current safety data, protocols, knowledge gaps and future research priorities were discussed and voted upon.ResultsThe establishment of a global database for tracking filler‐related AEs was favored by 93% of participants. Discussions revolved around the database's scope, data standardization, and whether non‐medical contributors should be included. Aspiration as a safety technique garnered support from 73% of participants. Approximately 43% of participants incorporate ultrasound in their injections, with divergent opinions on its impact and potential when used as a standard of practice versus in AE management. Most physicians on the task force incorporated cannula use for some of their injections (93%). There were varying perspectives on treatments for vascular adverse events (VAE), the primary causes, and the adoption of new protocols in the field.ConclusionsThe STF meeting underscored the need for a coordinated effort to address complications related to HA fillers, including VAE management and hyaluronidase protocols. Reliable treatment endpoints were evaluated, but improved measurement methods are needed. Future meetings will focus on addressing delayed complications, furthering safety in this field.
Slow‐channel myasthenia due to novel mutation in M2 domain of AChR delta subunit
Shen, Xin‐Ming , Milone, Margherita , Wang, Hang Long, Banwell, Brenda, Selcen, Duygu , Sine, Steven M. , Engel, Andrew G. , Shen, Xin-Ming

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology | September 27, 2019 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2066-2078

10.1002/acn3.50902 | PMID 31560172 Get It

AbstractObjectiveTo characterize the molecular and phenotypic basis of a severe slow‐channel congenital myasthenic syndrome (SCCMS).MethodsIntracellular and single‐channel recordings from patient endplates; alpha‐bungarotoxin binding studies; direct sequencing of AChR genes; microsatellite analysis; kinetic analysis of AChR activation; homology modeling of adult human AChR structure.ResultsAmong 24 variants reported to cause SCCMS only two appear in the AChR δ‐subunit. We here report a 16‐year‐old patient harboring a novel δL273F mutation (δL294F in HGVS nomenclature) in the second transmembrane domain (M2) of the AChR δ subunit. Kinetic analyses with ACh and the weak agonist choline indicate that δL273F prolongs the channel opening bursts 9.4‐fold due to a 75‐fold increase in channel gating efficiency, whereas a previously identified εL269F mutation (εL289F in HGVS nomenclature) at an equivalent location in the AChR ε‐subunit prolongs channel opening bursts 4.4‐fold due to a 30‐fold increase in gating efficiency. Structural modeling of AChR predicts that inter‐helical hydrophobic interactions between the mutant residue in the δ and ε subunit and nearby M2 domain residues in neighboring α subunits contribute to structural stability of the open relative to the closed channel states.InterpretationThe greater increase in gating efficiency by δL273F than by εL269F explains why δL273F has more severe clinical effects. Both δL273F and εL269F impair channel gating by disrupting hydrophobic interactions with neighboring α‐subunits. Differences in the extent of impairment of channel gating in δ and ε mutant receptors suggest unequal contributions of ε/α and δ/α subunit pairs to gating efficiency.