Citations

Autoimmune diseases arise when B and T lymphocytes lose tolerance to self. Yet in most disorders, the underlying molecular determinants, including autoantibodies, epitopes and lymphocyte clones that drive tissue injury remain undefined. Rapid-onset obesity with hypothalamic dysfunction, hypoventilation and autonomic dysregulation (ROHHAD) is a rare and often fatal pediatric neuroendocrine syndrome with strong evidence of antigen-driven paraneoplastic autoimmunity, including association with the intracellular autoantigen ZSCAN1. However, the effector immune circuit and the epitope-level determinants operating within the hypothalamus and brainstem have remained unknown. To address this challenge in ROHHAD and more broadly in autoimmune disease, we developed the Autoimmune Epitope and immunoGlobulin/Immune-receptor identification System (AEGIS), an integrated framework that links immune repertoires to their cognate self-epitopes. AEGIS combines B cell and T cell receptor profiling from sites of tissue injury with high-resolution epitope mapping, direct sequencing of antigen-specific autoantibodies, in silico antibody-antigen folding, selection, and T cell antigen discovery. Applied to a deeply phenotyped child with ROHHAD, AEGIS revealed a compartmentalized, clonally restricted immune response in which brain-deposited IgG and expanded cerebrospinal fluid B cell and CD4 T cell clonotypes converged on shared ZSCAN1 epitopes, resolved to minimal determinants and peptide-MHC ligands. These findings provide a clone- and epitope-linked mechanistic map of ROHHAD autoimmunity and establish a generalizable framework for identifying candidate pathogenic clones and antigens across diverse autoimmune diseases.

Introduction Patients (pts) with progressive disease after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy are unlikely to derive additional benefit from current salvage immunochemotherapies, and survival declines significantly with each subsequent treatment. Pts with refractory disease following second-line therapy have worse outcomes, with reported overall response rates (ORRs) of 1% to 14% and overall survival (OS) of 5 months (Blood. 2017;130[16]:1800-1808). While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a preferred strategy in the second- and third-line settings, pts with R/R disease following CAR-T experience dismal survival, with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as low as 3 and 5 months, respectively, and no agreed standard of care post CAR-T (Blood. 2022;140[24]:2527-2529). The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) was conducted in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or CAR-T. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory disease, or prior CAR-T. Methods In these subgroup analyses of ECHELON-3, eligible pts had 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, disease refractory to the last prior therapy, or prior exposure to CAR-T. Pts could qualify for ≥1 subgroup and were analyzed separately. Refractory disease was defined as stable or progressive disease as best overall response to last line of treatment or relapse ≤6 months from the end of treatment. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with rituximab (R; 375 mg/m2) q3w and lenalidomide (Len; 20 mg) once daily. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. P values are descriptive. Results In total, 230 pts were enrolled in ECHELON-3 from April 2021 to November 2023, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 0.1-31.5 months). Overall, 94 pts with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=48) or placebo+Len+R (n=46). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-not estimable) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.8 months) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.317-0.977; P=.0388). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.6 months) with BV+Len+R vs 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.0 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.279-0.764; P=.0020). ORR was 68.8% (95% CI, 53.7%-81.3%) with BV+Len+R vs 43.5% with placebo+Len+R (95% CI, 28.9%-58.9%; P=.0216); complete response (CR) rate was 52.1% vs 13.0%, respectively. Additional data for pts by lines of therapy received will be presented. In total, 194 pts with disease refractory to the most recent systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=98) and placebo+Len+R (n=96). Median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.3 months) with BV+Len+R vs 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.5 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.396-0.808; P=.0015). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.4 months) with BV+Len+R vs 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.363-0.712; P<.0001). ORR was 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.0%) with BV+Len+R vs 29.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P<.0001); CR rate was 34.7% vs 11.5%, respectively. Overall, 67 pts who received prior CAR-T were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=32) and placebo+Len+R (n=35). Median OS was 15.6 months with BV+Len+R vs 4.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.75). Median PFS was 3.0 months with BV+Len+R vs 1.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) with BV+Len+R vs 25.7% (95% CI, 12.5%-43.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0014); CR rate was 37.5% vs 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes, including CR and OS, in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, disease refractory to prior treatment, or prior CAR-T. This treatment benefit was generally consistent with that observed in the overall ECHELON-3 study population. Therefore, BV+Len+R has the potential to address an unmet need for effective and tolerable therapy in heavily pretreated pts, as described above.

Background: About 25% of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) have chronic total occlusion (CTO) at non-culprit artery. However, the prognostic impact of CTO in these patients is still unclear. Aims: We aimed to investigate the impact of CTO at non-culprit artery on 1-year mortality in patients with AMI-CS using the multicenter registry of cardiogenic shock. Methods: A total of 1,247 patients presented with cardiogenic shock (CS) were enrolled in the SMART-RESCUE registry between January 2014 and December 2018. After exclusion of non-ischemic cause shock, ischemic cardiomyopathy, failed or no revascularization, vasospasm, and patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, 695 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among these, we analyzed 536 patients with multivessel disease (MVD) according to the presence of CTO at non-culprit artery. The study endpoint was a 1-year all-cause mortality. We also examined the incidence of 1-year cardiac death, and in-hospital death or renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results: A 141 patients (26.3%) of study population had CTO lesion at non-culprit artery. The CTO group had more patients with diabetes mellitus, and lesser patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Although initial left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in CTO group (28.5 vs. 34.1%, P=0.005), initial systolic blood pressure (73.8 vs. 73.2 mmHg, P=0.822) and the level of lactate (6.6 vs. 6.4 mmol/L, P=0.804) were similar in both groups. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was applied in 206 patients (38.4%), and its use rate was comparable in 2 groups (40.4 vs. 37.7%, P=0.571). Pre- (32.9 vs. 22.9, P <0.001) and post-PCI SYNTAX score (16.7 vs. 5.3, P <0.001) was significantly higher in CTO group. In CTO group, 53 patients (37.6%) had CTO at left main or left anterior descending artery, and only 19 patients (13.5%) in CTO group received PCI for CTO. In multivariate analysis, all-cause mortality at 1-year was significantly higher in CTO group (51.8 vs. 40.5%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.90, P=0.011). The incidences of 1-year cardiac death (45.4 vs. 32.4%, HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.15-2.10, P=0.004) and in-hospital death or RRT (46.8 vs. 36.5%, P=0.031) were also higher in CTO group. Conclusions: Non-culprit CTO lesion was associated with higher 1-year mortality in patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease.

PURPOSE Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1- mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) ABC experience is reported here. METHODS An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label. RESULTS Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2– ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status. CONCLUSION Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2– ABC.

Heart disease has a higher fatality rate than any other disease. Increased Atrial fat on the left atrium has been discovered to cause Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in most patients. AF can put one’s life at risk and eventually lead to death. AF might worsen over time; therefore, it is crucial to have an early diagnosis and treatment. To evaluate the left atrium fat tissue pattern using Radon descriptor-based machine learning. This study developed a bridge between the Radon transform framework and machine learning to distinguish two distinct patterns. Motivated by a Radon descriptor-based machine learning approach, the patches of eight patients from CT images of the heart were used and categorized into “epicardial fat tissue” and “nonfat tissue” groups. The 10 feature vectors are extracted from each big patch using Radon descriptors and then fed into a traditional machine learning model. The results show that the proposed methodology discriminates between fat tissues and nonfat tissues clearly. KNN has shown the best performance with 96.77% specificity, 98.28% sensitivity, and 97.50% accuracy. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to provide a Radon transform-based machine learning method to distinguish between fat tissue and nonfat tissue on the left atrium. Our proposed research method could be potentially used in advanced interventions.