Abstract Radiation therapy (RT) has long been included in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). However, radioresistance in cancer cells as well as toxicity in normal tissues are major obstacles to clinical efficacy. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of tumor microenvironment-induced radioresistance during and after radiation therapy can provide fundamental insights to improve clinical outcomes in GBM. Here, using three-dimensional engineered hydrogel models in vitro, we report the influence of extracellular matrix, hypoxia, and adjacent neuronal cells in radiotherapeutic sensitivity. We find that mechanical cues and oxygen availability regulate cellular response to radiation, with softer matrices allowing for more DNA damage. Hyaluronan fragments from the extracellular matrix also modulate rapid metabolic response to radiation, especially in hypoxic environments. We show that neuronal networks influence tumor metabolic activity and the inflammatory response. Overall, we demonstrate here that alternative radiation strategies, such as low dose rate radiation therapy and microenvironmental regulation, have the potential to be more effective in a specific subset of radiosensitive GBM tumors.
MedError: A Machine-Assisted Framework for Systematic Error Analysis in Clinical Concept Extraction
Abstract Error analysis is a critical step in evaluating and improving clinical concept extraction models, the most common clinical natural language processing (NLP) task. Unlike corpus annotation, which follows standardized protocols for creating gold-standard datasets, error analysis requires nuanced judgment grounded in both clinical expertise and NLP knowledge. This is especially important given the heterogeneity of clinical text, where variations in documentation style, note structure, and terminology can substantially influence model behavior. Despite its importance, there is currently no standardized, user-level framework to support systematic error analysis in clinical concept extraction task. In this study, we developed and validated MedError, a machine-assisted, human-in-the-loop framework designed to standardize and enhance error analysis for clinical concept extraction tasks. We collected and manually curated a corpus of 1,187 unique errors from a total of 4,237 notes across three different distinct hospitals. The error categories were defined using our previously validated error taxonomy and included 480 false negatives and 707 false positives across 25 error types and 48 clinical concept categories. We evaluated the performance of three proprietary and three open-source large language models (LLMs) in automatically classifying these errors into 26 and 15 predefined categories. We further developed a machine-assisted framework, MedError, which integrates best practices in error analysis, LLM-assisted classification and reasoning, and a user-friendly interface to enable more efficient, reproducible, and context-aware error analysis. The framework supports both single-site and federated multisite error analysis, facilitating the effective translation of clinical NLP systems into real-world settings.