Citations

9029 Background: Molecular biomarkers such as EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 (V3) and TP53 mutation are associated with poor prognosis in patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion positive ( ALK+) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the effect of EML4-ALK fusion variants and TP53 mutation status on time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) of first-line (1L) treatment with a next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in pts with ALK+ NSCLC in the real-world setting. Methods: Pts with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who were ALK+ in circulating tumor DNA by Guardant360 (G360) liquid biopsy test from Jan 1, 2018, to Dec 31, 2021, and received 1L monotherapy with a next-generation ALK TKI (alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, lorlatinib) were identified in the Guardant INFORM clinical-genomics database. Median TTD of 1L ALK TKI treatment was determined by Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. The impact of EML4-ALK fusion variant and TP53 mutation status on TTD was evaluated. Results: Database search identified 495 pts with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who had ALK fusion by G360; of these, 214 pts received 1L treatment with a next-generation ALK TKI; 164 had G360 testing before treatment (alectinib, n=147; brigatinib, n=7; ceritinib, n=2; lorlatinib, n=8). Among these 164 pts, median age was 58.6 y, 53% were female, and 29% had baseline brain metastases. Median follow-up from start of 1L treatment was 14.8 mo. Median TTD was 19.6 mo (95% CI: 13.6–not reached [NR]). TP53 mutations were detected in 66 pts (40%). Median (95% CI) TTD in pts with TP53 mutation vs WT was 17.1 (9.5–28.5) vs 21.9 mo (14.3–NR; log-rank P=0.1712). Of 130 pts with EML4-ALK fusion variant type detected, 63 (48%) had V1, 54 (42%) V3, 8 (6%) V2, 4 (3%) V5, and 1 (1%) V8. In pts with EML4-ALK fusion V1 vs V3, median (95% CI) TTD was 19.0 (13.6–NR) vs 21.8 mo (8.7–NR; HR: 0.73; log-rank P=0.3039), with the KM plot showing numerically longer TTD in pts with V1 vs V3 during the first 18 mo and lines crossing at the tail end. Of 117 pts with both an EML4-ALK fusion variant (V1/V3) and TP53 data, 21 (18%) had both V3 and a TP53 mutation. Pts with co-occurring EML4-ALK V3 and TP53 mutation had the shortest TTD (median TTD 8.7 [3.9–NR; HR: 2.59; P=0.0219]; Table). Conclusions: Among pts with NSCLC and ALK fusion, co-occurrence of EML4-ALK V3 and TP53 mutation is common and associated with poor prognosis and high risk of early discontinuation of 1L treatment with a next-generation ALK TKI, most likely due to disease progression. Additional novel or combination therapies are warranted for this subpopulation. [Table: see text]

e14144 Background: There is little real-world evidence evaluating treatment patterns and outcomes with IO therapies for pts with advanced melanoma (aMEL). We present results from the OPTIMIzE (NCT02780089) study in pts with aMEL receiving IO therapies. Methods: OPTIMIzE is a US-based multisite (150 sites), community-based study of adult pts with aMEL. Pts receiving first-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO)+ipilimumab (IPI), anti-PD-1 (NIVO/pembrolizumab), or IPI between 2011-2018 with a minimum 1 y of follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. QoL assessments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Melanoma (FACT-M), EQ-5D index, and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Cohort size: 81 NIVO+IPI, 147 anti-PD-1, and 16 IPI (IPI arm not included in the analysis). Overall, mean age was 64.5 y; 42% had BRAF mutation. Mean follow-up was 14.1 mo. Pts in the NIVO+IPI group were younger, had better ECOG performance status, and a higher likelihood of M1c disease and elevated LDH vs the anti-PD-1 group. ORR was higher for pts treated with NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 (48% vs 33%, P= 0.08). Unadjusted 1-y OS was 78.4% for NIVO+IPI and 73.1% for anti-PD-1. In multivariate Cox model analysis, the hazard ratio for OS for NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.46–1.33; P= 0.36). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 53% and 22% of pts in the NIVO+IPI and anti-PD-1 groups, respectively ( P˂0.001). QoL changes from baseline were clinically meaningful for EQ-5D VAS and FACT-M in the NIVO+IPI group at 12 mo (Table). After adjusting for baseline covariates, the difference at 12 mo between NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 6.7 ( P= 0.04) for EQ-5D VAS and 8.8 ( P= 0.02) for FACT-M. Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes from this prospective real-world study are consistent with those reported in prior clinical trials in treatment-naive aMEL pts. No clinically meaningful deterioration in QoL measures was observed in either group. Clinical trial information: NCT02780089. [Table: see text]